In October 2003, the Premier-designate asked former Provincial Auditor, Mr. Erik Peters, to conduct an independent review of the Province's finances. The Report on the Review of the 2003-04 Fiscal Outlook, released that same month, confirmed that Ontario faced a potential deficit of $5.6 billion for 2003-04. This report also identified risks to the fiscal outlook of up to $1 billion that could cause the potential deficit to worsen by year-end.
While the Province's finances are complex, the source of the deficit is clear. Provincial spending has been growing much more quickly in recent years than revenue. In the last three years, program spending has increased by over $10 billion, while tax revenues have increased by half a billion dollars. As a result, Ontario now faces a structural deficit that threatens the ability of the Province to balance the budget and to provide acceptable levels of services to the public into the future.
The current government has repeatedly stated its intention to pursue an agenda of improving public services, measuring the results of improved services, and placing such key sectors as health care and education on a sound financial footing, in a fiscally responsible manner. In light of the severity of the current fiscal situation it inherited, the government will need to make difficult fiscal choices and trade-offs.
This annex:
Ontario's total revenue in 2003-04 is forecast to be $69.5 billion. Major categories of Provincial revenues include Taxation, Income from Government Enterprises, payments from the Government of Canada and Other Non-Tax Revenues.
Taxation revenues comprise the largest category of revenue for the provincial government. Of the $69.5 billion in Provincial revenue expected in 2003-04, $49.9 billion or about 72 per cent is expected to be derived from taxation revenue. Three revenue sources within this category- Personal Income Tax, Retail Sales Tax and Corporations Tax-account for 58 per cent of total revenue. The Province also collects a number of other taxes such as Gasoline and Fuel Taxes, Tobacco Tax, Employer Health Tax and Land Transfer Tax.
In 2003-04, the Province is forecasting payments from the Government of Canada totalling $10.3 billion. The federal government makes most of these payments through the Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST), which supports a number of areas of Provincial spending, notably health care, post-secondary education and social services. Federal transfers represent 15 per cent of Ontario's revenue forecast for 2003-04.
Income from Government Enterprises, including the Liquor Control Board of Ontario and the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, is forecast to be $3.4 billion this year. These revenue sources represent 5 per cent of total Provincial revenue.
In 2003-04, the Province expects to collect $5.9 billion in Other Non-Tax Revenue. These revenues cover a wide range of government activities and are largely from fees, permits, sales and rentals, and reimbursements for services the Province provides. Other Non-Tax Revenues represent 8 per cent of total Provincial revenue in 2003-04.
The revenue performance chart highlights growth in total revenue from 1994-95 to 2003-04. After increasing dramatically in the second half of the 1990s, due in part to strong economic growth, revenue growth has weakened in recent years. This reflects slower economic growth since 2000 and the impact of tax cuts.
In 2003-04, it is estimated that total Provincial expense will amount to $75.2 billion. About 70 per cent of all Provincial spending is on social programs including health, education and social services, with the balance allocated for economic development, justice, interest costs on the debt, and other government activities.
While the Province supports a wide range of services to the public, funding for health care and education accounts for the largest share of spending. In 2003-04, health care spending at $29.0 billion is expected to account for 39 per cent of total Provincial spending. Education and Training, which includes Provincial spending in support of school boards and provincial grants for colleges, universities and training, totals $14.2 billion or 19 per cent. Funding for social services including children's services, Ontario Works, and the Ontario Disability Support Program, represents $8.2 billion or 11 per cent.
In 2003-04, Provincial spending on the environment, resources and economic development will comprise $5.9 billion or 8 per cent of total spending. This total also includes spending on government priorities such as transportation, agriculture and energy. The Justice sector, including the Ministry of the Attorney General and the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, represents $2.9 billion or 4 per cent of Provincial spending.
General Government and Other comprises ministries such as Management Board Secretariat and the Ministry of Finance that take a central or corporate role in providing government services and policy advice. In 2003-04, General Government spending at $4.9 billion is expected to account for 6 per cent of total Provincial expense.
In 2003-04, interest costs on Ontario's net debt, estimated at $139 billion, will amount to $10 billion, or 13 per cent of total spending.
The expense performance chart highlights growth in total spending from 1994-95. Total spending has increased dramatically in recent years.
More than 80 per cent of total Provincial spending, excluding interest on debt, is in the form of transfer payments to organizations and individuals. Provincial transfer payments support key organizations and agencies within the broader public sector, such as hospitals, school boards, colleges and universities, as well as individuals who receive payments such as social assistance or the Guaranteed Annual Income System (GAINS).
Non-transfer payment spending, including Provincial spending for programs and services delivered directly by the Ontario government itself, such as courts, correctional services and policing services provided by the Ontario Provincial Police, represents the remaining 19 per cent of Ontario's spending on programs and capital.
In 2003-04, the five largest transfer payment programs alone will account for about $33 billion or more than half of Ontario's program spending.
| Ontario's Five Largest Transfer Payment Programs | 2003-04 ($ Billions) |
Per cent of Program Spending |
|---|---|---|
| Operation of Hospitals | 10.5 | 16.8 |
| School Board Operating Grants | 9.4 | 15.0 |
| OHIP Payments to Physicians and Practitioners | 6.8 | 10.8 |
| Ontario Disability Support Program and Ontario Works | 3.8 | 6.1 |
| Drug Programs* | 2.8 | 4.5 |
| Total | 33.3 | 53.3 |
* Drug Programs includes $2.3 billion in Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and $0.5 billion in Ministry of Community and Social Services.
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
While increasing demands exist in many program areas, the single most significant source of upward pressure on Provincial spending is health care. Increasing demands for health care services and rapidly rising costs are affecting all provinces in Canada. Over the past five years, Ontario's health care operating spending has increased at an average annual rate of about 8 per cent. This is twice the rate of growth in total Provincial spending, excluding health care, of about 4 per cent during the same period.
As a result of this rapid growth, health care has been consuming an increasing share of Provincial spending. In 1994-95, total health care spending accounted for 32 per cent of Provincial spending and this year, health care will account for 39 per cent.
Health care now accounts for 46 per cent of Provincial program spending, excluding capital and interest on debt, clearly illustrating the extent to which increased health care costs are limiting options in other program areas. The composition of Provincial program expense by sector can be found in the tables and graphs section to this annex.
The cost of providing health care services is driven by many factors including the demographic pressures of an aging population, labour costs and rapid technological change. Ontario's seniors currently make up close to 13 per cent of the population, but account for about 50 per cent of Provincial health spending.
Demographic trends indicate that the proportion of the population aged 65 and over will increase significantly in the future. Over the next 25 years, the seniors' population in Ontario is expected to rise from 1.5 million in 2003-04 to almost 3.2 million in 2028. A shortage of health professionals in Ontario and other jurisdictions, combined with the highly labour-intensive nature of health care delivery, has resulted in upward wage pressures in recent years. These shortages are most acute in nursing and certain medical specialties. In addition, new technologies and better diagnostic procedures, which improve the quality and length of life, are placing additional costs on the health care system.
The programs and services delivered by the provincial government and Ontario's broader public sector (BPS) are provided by a variety of people, including doctors, nurses, teachers and civil servants. More than 80 per cent of Provincial spending, excluding interest on debt, is in the form of transfer payments to individuals and BPS partners, such as hospitals, schools, colleges and universities. Furthermore, within major areas of the broader public sector itself, typically about 75 per cent of operating costs are related to salaries and benefits
As a result, compensation costs and wage settlements are key cost drivers and have a substantial impact on both the finances of BPS partners and the Province.
| Sector | Cost of 1% salary increase |
Size of Sector |
|---|---|---|
| OHIP Payments to Physicians | $58 million | Over 21,000 physicians in Ontario, comprising 10,000 family doctors and 11,000 specialists. |
| Hospital Nurses | $34 million | Over 40,000 nurses in hospitals. |
| Elementary and Secondary School Staff | $115 million* | Over 180,000 staff including teachers, principals, administrators, support and maintenance staff. |
| Ontario Public Service | $45 million | Over 60,000 public servants. |
* One per cent increase to salary benchmarks in Student-Focused Funding formula.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Depending on the magnitude of upcoming wage settlements, higher compensation costs could produce upward pressures on Provincial finances directly and on the broader public sector, which may rely on Provincial financial support.
While governments and households are dissimilar in many ways, both must live within their means. A household that spends more each month than it takes home in pay can get by for a while by running down savings or borrowing from a line of credit. Governments can do the same. But for both, what works in the short run may lead to problems in the long run. Savings accounts run out, eventually limits on lines of credit are exhausted, and carrying costs increasingly eat into budgets.
The only sustainable approach in the long run both for households and for governments is to keep spending in line with income. Aligning spending and revenue as closely as possible, and including prudent measures such as a budgetary reserve to help ensure that a fiscal plan can accommodate unexpected shocks, creates a sustainable fiscal policy. This is the way that governments live within their means.
This approach is good for governments, its transfer partners and for citizens. Hospitals, school boards and other organizations that rely on Provincial transfers can plan better, because their funding is more likely to be predictable and stable. Ontarians can feel more confident because the prudence built into the plan will help their government avoid pressures for tax increases, additional borrowing or service cuts if conditions change suddenly and adversely.
By recognizing the need to keep spending in line with revenue, a sustainable fiscal policy is based on the premise of a balanced budget. Deficits are funded through borrowing, and rising government debt eventually affects everyone. While governments can generally borrow at relatively low interest rates, interest costs reduce amounts available to governments for other spending. Chronic deficits seriously weaken a government's ability to provide programs and services.
The challenge for governments everywhere in the developed world is to meet the needs of citizens as pressures grow for more health care and better education. At the same time, there is an expectation that taxes will not increase and governments will avoid deficits.
This has led to a shift in the way that governments operate: increasingly, the focus is on the results of spending. This shift recognizes that it is not just how much that is spent that matters. It is equally important to measure what the spending has achieved for society as a whole, in terms of key outcomes such as literacy and numeracy rates.
As noted, the Peters Report identified a potential deficit of $5.6 billion for 2003-04. Many of the factors that produced this $5.6 billion deficit are structural, or permanent in nature, and unless action is taken will affect the Province for years to come.
The rapid growth in spending in recent years, combined with the impact of tax cuts on base revenue growth, has produced a fiscal situation that is not sustainable. This year the results of these past policies are clear: the Province is spending considerably more than it collects in revenue. To put it simply, the Province is not living within its means.
The Province earns revenue in different ways: taxation revenue, fees and licences, earnings from Provincially owned enterprises, and transfers from the federal government. Of these sources, taxation revenues, such as Personal Income Tax and Retail Sales Tax revenues, are the largest and best support for ongoing Provincial spending on necessary programs and services.
In 2000-01, when Ontario's budget was balanced, taxation revenues at $49.5 billion, were almost equal to Ontario's program spending of $51.1 billion. Since 2000-01, however, tax revenues have increased marginally by half a billion dollars as the impact of a slowing economy on Provincial revenue was further aggravated by Provincial tax cuts. Over the same period, spending on Provincial programs increased by over $10 billion.
While these past spending increases were often for priorities-higher spending on health care, for example-the Province's revenue base could not support these higher levels of spending and tax cuts at the same time. By 2003-04, Provincial spending and the Province's tax base were fundamentally and structurally misaligned.
Ontario is currently projecting a deficit of $5,621 million for 2003-04. The current fiscal outlook for 2003-04 reflects changes in the accounting treatment of the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) consistent with the recently released 2002-03 Public Accounts and the recommendation of the Peters Report, as well as the impact of recent revenue and expense measures announced by the government that are highlighted in the appendix to this annex.
| 2003-04 Fiscal Outlook ($ Millions) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
Change | ||
| $ Millions | Per cent | |||
| Revenue | 68,609 | 69,532 | 923 | 1.3 |
| Expense | ||||
| Programs | 56,922 | 62,554 | 5,632 | 9.9 |
| Capital | 1,876 | 2,574 | 698 | 37.2 |
| Interest on Debt | 9,694 | 10,025 | 331 | 3.4 |
| Total Expense | 68,492 | 75,153 | 6,661 | 9.7 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | 117 | (5,621) | (5,738) | -- |
Note: Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Revenue is projected to be $69,532 million in 2003-04, an increase of $923 million from last year's level of $68,609 million. The increased revenues this year are primarily due to higher transfers from the federal government and a small increase in taxation revenues.
| Revenue by Source
($ Millions) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
Change | ||
| $ Millions | Per cent | |||
| Taxation Revenue | ||||
| Personal Income Tax | 18,195 | 18,600 | 405 | 2.2 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 14,183 | 14,550 | 367 | 2.6 |
| Corporations Tax | 7,459 | 7,215 | (244) | (3.3) |
| All Other Taxes | 9,714 | 9,582 | (132) | (1.4) |
| Total Taxation Revenue | 49,551 | 49,947 | 396 | 0.8 |
| Government of Canada | 8,894 | 10,264 | 1,370 | 15.4 |
| Income from Government Enterprises | 3,942 | 3,434 | (508) | (12.9) |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | 6,222 | 5,887 | (335) | (5.4) |
| Total Revenue | 68,609 | 69,532 | 923 | 1.3 |
Note: Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
The expense outlook at $75,153 million in 2003-04 is up $6,661 million from the level recorded in 2002-03. Increased spending was concentrated in health care, education, the post-secondary sector and infrastructure.
| Expense by Sector
($ Millions) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
Change | ||
| $ Millions | Per cent | |||
| Programs | ||||
| Health Care | 25,758 | 28,507 | 2,749 | 10.7 |
| Education | 9,236 | 10,127 | 891 | 9.6 |
| Post-Secondary Education | 3,471 | 3,996 | 525 | 15.1 |
| Social Services | 7,821 | 8,154 | 333 | 4.3 |
| Justice | 2,955 | 2,814 | (141) | (4.8) |
| Other Programs | 7,681 | 8,956 | 1,275 | 16.6 |
| Total Programs | 56,922 | 62,554 | 5,632 | 9.9 |
| Capital | 1,876 | 2,574 | 698 | 37.2 |
| Interest on Debt | 9,694 | 10,025 | 331 | 3.4 |
| Total Expense | 68,492 | 75,153 | 6,661 | 9.7 |
Note: Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Since the release of the Peters Report, a number of other potential liabilities have come to the attention of the government. These liabilities may have an impact on the 2003-04 deficit but were outside the scope of Erik Peters' mandate and as such, any fiscal impact of these potential liabilities is not reflected in the $5.6 billion deficit outlook he confirmed.
The government is currently reviewing these potential liabilities to determine how best to deal with these issues in a fiscally responsible manner. The table below provides a few examples of potential liabilities that have been identified to date.
| Potential Liability | Fiscal Impact |
|---|---|
| Hospitals Accumulated Working Capital Shortfalls | up to $1.2 billion |
| Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund (PBGF) | up to $500 million |
| Potential Writedown of Pickering "A" Assets | up to $500 million |
| 2002-03 Children's Aid Societies' Deficits | up to $25 million |
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
This section outlines a fiscal projection for the Province over the medium term to 2006-07. The fiscal projection indicates that difficult choices will need to be made in order to balance the budget and put into place a sustainable fiscal policy and framework for the long term.
The medium-term fiscal projection for Ontario is based on a "no policy change" outlook that assumes no further changes to the current tax structure beyond those already announced or to existing programs and services.
Other key assumptions incorporated into this projection:
| Potential Medium-Term Fiscal Projection - "No Policy Change"
($ Billions) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outlook 2003-04 |
Projection | |||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | ||
| Revenue | 69.5 | 73.5 | 77.9 | 81.7 |
| Total Expense | 75.2 | 77.2 | 81.4 | 85.2 |
| Less: Reserve | -- | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | (5.6) | (4.7) | (4.5) | (4.5) |
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
This "no policy change" projection for Ontario indicates large deficits over the medium term, unless action is taken to restore the Province's finances. Assuming current interest rate projections, each $1 billion in deficit adds about $50 million in annual interest charges, diverting scarce resources from other areas of spending such as health care and education.
The government has clearly indicated that this deficit track is not sustainable or acceptable.
Assuming no further federal or provincial taxation policy changes beyond those already announced, Ontario revenues are projected to continue to grow over the next three years by an average growth rate of 5.5 per cent. The table below outlines the medium-term revenue projection consistent with the current consensus economic forecast.
| Revenue by Source
($ Billions) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outlook 2003-04 |
Projection | |||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | ||
| Taxation Revenue | ||||
| Personal Income Tax | 18.6 | 20.0 | 21.6 | 23.1 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 14.6 | 15.5 | 16.6 | 17.6 |
| Corporations Tax | 7.2 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| All Other Taxes | 9.6 | 10.1 | 10.6 | 10.9 |
| Total Taxation Revenue | 49.9 | 53.8 | 57.3 | 60.7 |
| Government of Canada | 10.3 | 10.1 | 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Income from Government Enterprises | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Total Revenue | 69.5 | 73.5 | 77.9 | 81.7 |
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Revenue growth from a growing economy alone will not be sufficient to balance the budget if spending growth continues at current rates. As outlined earlier, the potential "no policy change" deficit would remain at about $4.5 billion for the next three years unless spending growth can be reduced.
The chart below shows that given the current revenue outlook over the medium term, spending would have to be cut in order to balance the budget by 2004-05. Balancing by 2005-06 or 2006-07 would require much slower spending growth than in recent years.
The government has indicated that it will consult widely with the public and stakeholders on how to best deal with the fiscal challenges ahead. As well, the government will review all non-tax revenue mechanisms to ensure a stronger revenue base that will fund the transformation of key government services.
While these fiscal scenarios serve to illustrate the many difficult choices facing the government as it plans for a balanced budget, it should be noted that these scenarios use planning assumptions only. These underlying assumptions could be materially altered by government decisions and advice, including advice received through the forthcoming public consultation process. It is expected that as a result of public consultations, the eventual outcome could differ substantially from the scenarios presented in this section.
Ontario currently faces a deficit of at least $5.6 billion in 2003-04. Based on reasonable revenue projections and the recent experience in Provincial spending growth, Ontario faces an ongoing structural deficit into the medium term, unless firm action is taken.
The government is determined to restore the Province's finances to a sustainable fiscal path, one that provides for health care, education and other services that the people of Ontario expect while ensuring that the government lives within its means. Only by eliminating the deficit can Ontario's programs and services be sustained and funded adequately in the long term.
| Statement of Financial Transactions ($ Millions) |
Table 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999-00 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
|
| Revenue | 64,804 | 66,044 | 66,249 | 68,609 | 69,532 |
| Expense | |||||
| Programs | 48,222 | 51,146 | 53,647 | 56,922 | 62,554 |
| Capital | 4,887 | 2,123 | 1,890 | 1,876 | 2,574 |
| Interest on Debt | 11,027 | 10,873 | 10,337 | 9,694 | 10,025 |
| Total Expense | 64,136 | 64,142 | 65,874 | 68,492 | 75,153 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | 668 | 1,902 | 375 | 117 | (5,621) |
| Net Debt | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 132,647 | 138,970 |
| Accumulated Deficit | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 118,705 | 124,326 |
Note: Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis starting in 1999-00. Expense and revenue totals for prior years have been restated to reflect the new accounting treatment. Net debt represents the difference between liabilities and financial assets. Accumulated deficit represents net debt adjusted for tangible capital assets.
| Revenue ($ Millions) |
Table 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
||||
| Taxation Revenue | |||||
| Personal Income Tax | 18,195 | 18,600 | |||
| Retail Sales Tax | 14,183 | 14,550 | |||
| Corporations Tax | 7,459 | 7,215 | |||
| Employer Health Tax | 3,589 | 3,705 | |||
| Gasoline Tax | 2,306 | 2,310 | |||
| Fuel Tax | 682 | 695 | |||
| Tobacco Tax | 1,183 | 1,310 | |||
| Land Transfer Tax | 814 | 835 | |||
| Electricity Payments-In-Lieu of Taxes | 711 | 532 | |||
| Other Taxes | 429 | 195 | |||
| 49,551 | 49,947 | ||||
| Government of Canada | |||||
| Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST) | 7,346 | 7,093 | |||
| CHST Supplements | 191 | 577 | |||
| Health Reform Fund | - | 387 | |||
| Diagnostic/Medical Equipment | - | 193 | |||
| Social Housing | 525 | 643 | |||
| Infrastructure | 62 | 285 | |||
| Other Government of Canada | 770 | 1,086 | |||
| 8,894 | 10,264 | ||||
| Income from Investment in Government Business Enterprises | |||||
| Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation | 2,288 | 2,065 | |||
| Liquor Control Board of Ontario | 939 | 1,048 | |||
| Ontario Power Generation Inc. and Hydro One Inc. | 717 | 318 | |||
| Other Government Enterprises | (2) | 3 | |||
| 3,942 | 3,434 | ||||
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | |||||
| Reimbursements | 1,111 | 1,208 | |||
| Electricity Debt Retirement Charge | 889 | 979 | |||
| Vehicle and Driver Registration Fees | 982 | 933 | |||
| Power Sales | 635 | 611 | |||
| Sales and Rentals | 560 | 571 | |||
| Other Fees and Licences | 606 | 531 | |||
| Liquor Licence Revenue | 530 | 477 | |||
| Royalties | 304 | 225 | |||
| Miscellaneous Other Non-Tax Revenue | 605 | 352 | |||
| 6,222 | 5,887 | ||||
| Total Revenue | 68,609 | 69,532 | |||
Note: Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis.
| Operating Expense ($ Millions) |
Table 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ministry | Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
|||
| Agriculture and Food | 613 | 661 | |||
| Attorney General | 1,057 | 1,060 | |||
| Board of Internal Economy | 146 | 169 | |||
| Children's Services | 2,171 | 2,314 | |||
| Citizenship and Immigration | 53 | 63 | |||
| Community and Social Services | 5,650 | 5,840 | |||
| Community Safety and Correctional Services | 1,898 | 1,754 | |||
| Consumer and Business Services | 177 | 177 | |||
| Culture | 330 | 278 | |||
| Economic Development and Trade | 247 | 315 | |||
| Education | 8,998 | 9,787 | |||
| Teachers' Pension Plan (TPP) | 238 | 340 | |||
| Energy | 144 | 130 | |||
| Environment | 232 | 274 | |||
| Executive Offices | 20 | 20 | |||
| Finance - Own Account | 1,092 | 1,222 | |||
| Interest on Debt | 9,694 | 10,025 | |||
| Community Reinvestment Fund | 622 | 649 | |||
| Electricity Consumer Price Protection Fund | 665 | 292 | |||
| Power Purchases | 786 | 918 | |||
| Health and Long-Term Care | 25,758 | 27,885 | |||
| SARS-related Health Costs | - | 622 | |||
| Intergovernmental Affairs | 6 | 6 | |||
| Labour | 123 | 120 | |||
| Management Board Secretariat | 172 | 336 | |||
| Retirement Benefits | 102 | 335 | |||
| Contingency Fund | - | 625 | |||
| Municipal Affairs | 636 | 684 | |||
| Native Affairs Secretariat | 16 | 15 | |||
| Natural Resources | 454 | 530 | |||
| Northern Development and Mines | 73 | 74 | |||
| Office of Francophone Affairs | 3 | 4 | |||
| Public Infrastructure Renewal | 33 | 35 | |||
| Tourism and Recreation | 135 | 228 | |||
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 3,471 | 3,996 | |||
| Transportation | 801 | 796 | |||
| Total Operating Expense | 66,616 | 72,579 | |||
Note: Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis. Preliminary allocations by ministry, pending finalization of the realignment of government ministries currently under way.
| Capital Expense ($ Millions) |
Table 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ministry | Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
|||
| Agriculture and Food | 68 | 1 | |||
| Attorney General | 43 | 31 | |||
| Community and Social Services | 23 | 13 | |||
| Community Safety and Correctional Services | 66 | 55 | |||
| Consumer and Business Services | 1 | 1 | |||
| Culture | 42 | 65 | |||
| Economic Development and Trade | 21 | 46 | |||
| Education | 10 | 16 | |||
| Energy | 46 | 47 | |||
| Environment | 13 | 15 | |||
| Finance | 8 | 11 | |||
| Health and Long-Term Care | 339 | 504 | |||
| Management Board Secretariat | 3 | - | |||
| Municipal Affairs | 20 | 188 | |||
| Native Affairs Secretariat | 2 | 3 | |||
| Natural Resources | 72 | 91 | |||
| Northern Development and Mines | 391 | 356 | |||
| Public Infrastructure Renewal | 4 | 169 | |||
| Capital Contingency Fund | - | 114 | |||
| Tourism and Recreation | 55 | 55 | |||
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 71 | 100 | |||
| Transportation | 578 | 693 | |||
| Total Capital Expense* | 1,876 | 2,574 | |||
| Schedule of Net Investment in Capital Assets ($ Millions) |
Table 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 Outlook | |||||
| Land and Buildings | Transportation Infrastructure | Government Organizations' Capital Assets | Total | ||
| Acquisition/Construction of Major Tangible Capital Assets | 133 | 1,042 | 346 | 1,521 | |
| Amortization of Provincially Owned Major Tangible Capital Assets | (110) | (546) | (163) | (819) | |
| Net Investment in Capital Assets * | 23 | 496 | 183 | 702 | |
* Starting in 2002-03, major tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries (land, buildings and transportation infrastructure) are accounted for on a full accrual accounting basis. Other tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries will continue to be accounted for as expense in the year of acquisition or construction.
| Ten-Year Review of Selected Financial and Economic Statistics ($ Millions) |
Table 6 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-95 | 1995-96 | 1996-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-99 | 1999-00 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Outlook 2003-04 |
|
| Financial Transactions | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 46,039 | 49,473 | 49,450 | 52,518 | 55,786 | 64,804 | 66,044 | 66,249 | 68,609 | 69,532 |
| Expense | ||||||||||
| Programs | 44,505 | 46,163 | 45,136 | 45,304 | 46,557 | 48,222 | 51,146 | 53,647 | 56,922 | 62,554 |
| Capital | 3,831 | 3,635 | 2,612 | 2,451 | 2,215 | 4,887 | 2,123 | 1,890 | 1,876 | 2,574 |
| Interest on Debt | 7,832 | 8,475 | 8,607 | 8,729 | 9,016 | 11,027 | 10,873 | 10,337 | 9,694 | 10,025 |
| Total Expense | 56,168 | 58,273 | 56,355 | 56,484 | 57,788 | 64,136 | 64,142 | 65,874 | 68,492 | 75,153 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | (10,129) | (8,800) | (6,905) | (3,966) | (2,002) | 668 | 1,902 | 375 | 117 | (5,621) |
| Net Debt | 90,728 | 101,864 | 108,769 | 112,735 | 114,737 | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 132,647 | 138,970 |
| Accumulated Deficit | 90,728 | 101,864 | 108,769 | 112,735 | 114,737 | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 118,705 | 124,326 |
| Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at Market Prices | 311,096 | 329,317 | 338,173 | 359,353 | 377,897 | 409,020 | 440,708 | 452,923 | 478,112 | 501,061 |
| Personal Income | 260,671 | 271,397 | 276,303 | 289,537 | 304,652 | 321,702 | 347,427 | 359,783 | 372,444 | 385,852 |
| Population-July (000s) | 10,818 | 10,950 | 11,083 | 11,228 | 11,367 | 11,506 | 11,685 | 11,898 | 12,097 | 12,238 |
| Net Debt per Capita (dollars) | 8,387 | 9,303 | 9,814 | 10,041 | 10,094 | 11,681 | 11,339 | 11,104 | 10,965 | 11,356 |
| Personal Income per Capita (dollars) | 24,096 | 24,785 | 24,930 | 25,787 | 26,801 | 27,959 | 29,733 | 30,239 | 30,788 | 31,529 |
| Total Expense as a per cent of GDP | 18.1 | 17.7 | 16.7 | 15.7 | 15.3 | 15.7 | 14.6 | 14.5 | 14.3 | 15.0 |
| Interest on Debt as a per cent of Revenue | 17.0 | 17.1 | 17.4 | 16.6 | 16.2 | 17.0 | 16.5 | 15.6 | 14.1 | 14.4 |
| Net Debt as a per cent of GDP | 29.2 | 30.9 | 32.2 | 31.4 | 30.4 | 32.9 | 30.1 | 29.2 | 27.7 | 27.7 |
| Note: | Consistent with the treatment in the 2002-03 Public Accounts, the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) is consolidated on a line-by-line basis starting in 1999-00. Expense and revenue totals for prior years have been restated to reflect the new accounting treatment. Net debt represents the difference between liabilities and financial assets. Accumulated deficit represents net debt adjusted for tangible capital assets. |
| Sources: | Ontario Ministry of Finance and Statistics Canada. |
| Selected Risks and Sensitivities to the Fiscal Plan - The Ontario Economy and Revenue | Table 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Item | 2003-04 Assumption | Sensitivities |
| Real Economic Growth1 | 1.7 per cent real GDP growth in 2003 | $0.6 billion per percentage point of growth. |
| Composition of Economic Growth Examples: | ||
| Wages and Salaries | 4.0 per cent growth in 2003 | One percentage point change, other things equal, changes revenues by $0.3 billion, mainly Personal Income and Employer Health Taxes. |
| Personal Consumption Expenditure | 3.8 per cent real growth in 2003 | One percentage point change, other things equal, changes revenues by $0.1 billion, mainly Retail Sales Tax. |
| Corporate Profits | 11.5 per cent growth in 2003 | Two percentage points change, other things equal, changes revenues by $0.1 billion, mainly Corporations Tax. |
| Ontario Population Share | 38.7 per cent of Canada-wide population in 2003 | Three-tenths of a percentage point change in population share would change Federal Payments by $0.1 billion. |
| 2002 Personal Income and Corporations Tax return processing | 2002-03 revenues overestimated by $0.3 billion based on tax return processing data received after 2002-03 Public Accounts finalized | Risk to the current 2003-04 revenue outlook of +/- $0.6 billion from further 2002 tax return processing. |
| Data applied in federal funding formulas | Federal payments outlook fully consistent with current demographic, economic and tax assumptions | Could partially offset changes in tax revenues. Changes also possible based on other data. Current risk of +/- $0.3 billion. |
1. This response would hold "on average" and could vary significantly depending on the composition of change in income and expenditures.
| Selected Risks and Sensitivities to the Fiscal Plan - Expense | Table 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Program | 2003-04 Assumption | Sensitivities |
| Hospitals | Annual growth of 7.8 per cent | Average annual growth was almost 10 per cent from 1999-00 to 2002-03. One per cent change in hospital funding: $105 million. |
| Drug programs | Annual growth of 10.4 per cent (in health portion) | One per cent change in utilization of all drug programs: $28 million. |
| Long-term care community services/ home care | Over 15.6 million hours of homemaking and support services | One per cent change in hours of homemaking and support services: $4 million. |
| 7.9 million nursing and professional visits | One per cent change in nursing and professional visits: $5 million. | |
| Long-term care facilities | Almost 69,500 long-term care facility beds | Annual average operating cost per bed in a long-term care facility is over $30,000. One per cent change in number of beds: $21 million. |
| Elementary and secondary schools | Almost 2 million average daily pupil enrolment | One per cent enrolment change: $150 million. |
| College students | 155,000 full-time students | One per cent enrolment change: $7 million. |
| University students | 275,000 full-time students | One per cent enrolment change: $19 million. |
| Ontario Works | 190,000 average annual caseload | One per cent caseload change: $15 million. |
| Ontario Disability Support Program | 220,000 average annual caseload | One per cent caseload change: $21 million. |
| Judicial system | 2.9 million adult inmate days per year | Average cost $150 per inmate per day. One per cent change in inmate days: $4 million. |
| Interest on debt | Average borrowing cost of 5.4 per cent for new financing | 100 basis points change in borrowing costs for new financing: $45 million. |



| Major Changes from Erik Peters Report | 2003-04 $ Billions |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 Deficit Outlook - As Reported October 29, 2003 | (5.6) | |
| Revenue | ||
| Federal SARS relief - reflected as revenue, consistent with Provincial financial statements |
0.3 | |
| Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) Income - as per 2002-03 Public Accounts treatment |
2.1 | |
| Tax Measures - impact of cancelling Equity in Education Tax Credit (EiETC), reductions in Personal Income Tax (PIT) and Corporations Tax rates, and elimination of first-tier on PIT surtax |
0.4 | |
| Increased Tobacco Taxes - as announced November 24, 2003 | 0.1 | |
| Lower Revenue forecast - impact of weaker 2002 tax assessments | (0.5) | |
| Add: Total Change in Revenue Outlook | 2.4 | |
| Expense | ||
| SARS costs - treatment consistent with Provincial financial statements | 0.3 | |
| Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation Expense - as per 2002-03 Public Accounts treatment: |
||
| Impact on interest on debt | 1.2 | |
| Impact on other expense | 1.5 | |
| Seniors' Property Tax Rebate - impact of cancelling | (0.4) | |
| Establish Contingency Fund | 0.6 | |
| Less: Total Change in Expense Outlook | 3.1 | |
| Add: Electricity Sector | 0.7 | |
| OEFC net income (increase in stranded debt) allocated to revenue, interest on debt, and expense - as per 2002-03 Public Accounts treatment |
||
| Current Deficit Outlook | (5.6) | |
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.