Introduction
2010 Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund
2010 Combined Benefit
Transitional Assistance
Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR)
Upload Benefit To Municipalities
Ontario’s Commitment To Municipalities
Data and Benchmark Updates for 2010
The Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund: Grants and Components
I. Social Programs Grant
1. Assessment Threshold Component
2. Income Threshold Component
II. Equalization Grant
1. Assessment Equalization Grant Component
2. Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment Grant Component
III. Northern and Rural Communities Grant
1. Rural Communities Grant Component
2. Northern Communities Grant Component
3. Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component
4. Stabilization Grant Component
IV. Police Services Grant
Transitional Assistance
Implementation
Municipal Workbook
Social Programs Cost Report
Municipal Tier Distribution of Funding
Additional Information
Appendices
Appendix A — Definitions
Appendix B — Data Sources
Appendix C — Summary of Refinements and Updates
This guide outlines the grant parameters for the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF), and summarizes the updates and refinements introduced in 2010. It is intended to provide a technical overview of the funding model.
The OMPF assists municipalities with their social program costs, includes equalization measures, addresses challenges faced by northern and rural communities, and responds to policing costs in rural communities. The OMPF replaced the Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) in 2005 as the province’s main transfer payment to municipalities.
The OMPF continues to remain responsive to changing municipal circumstances such as updates in assessment, households or policing costs. Consistent with this key principle, the 2010 OMPF social programs grants have been adjusted to reflect the reduction in municipal costs from the uploads of the Ontario Drug Benefit Program (ODB), Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) administration, and the phased upload of ODSP and Ontario Works (OW) benefits that resulted from the Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR).
$25 million in targeted transitional assistance will also be provided in 2010 to eligible municipalities throughout the province.
In 2010, the government will provide $1.2 billion to 406 municipalities through the combined benefit of the OMPF plusreduced municipal costs from the uploads of ODB, ODSP administration and the phased upload of ODSP and OW benefits.
This combined benefit represents a 26 per cent increase over the combined benefit announced for 2009 and a 93 per cent increase over the funding provided in 2004 under the previous program, the CRF.
| 2004 | 2009 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRF/OMPF | $618 million | $704 million | $625 million |
| Uploaded Social Assistance Benefit Program Costs | $245 million | $570 million | |
| Total Combined Benefit | $618 million | $949 million | $1,195 million |
| Year-over-Year Increase | – | $79 million 9% |
$246 million 26% |
| Increase Since 2004 | – | $331 million 54% |
$577 million 93% |
$25 million in targeted transitional assistance will be provided in 2010 only. This assistance is designed to ensure that eligible municipalities receive a guaranteed level of support based on the combined benefit of both OMPF and provincial uploads received in 2009. The assistance is targeted so that the guarantee for northern municipalities will be set at a higher level.
On October 31, 2008, the province, along with the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) and the City of Toronto, released the consensus Report of the Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR), “Facing the Future Together”.
As a result of the PMFSDR, municipalities are benefiting from the government’s decision to upload social assistance benefit program costs off the property tax base.
In 2010, the province will begin the phased upload of:
This builds on the government’s previous uploads of:
201 upper- and single-tier municipalities will see an estimated $570 million reduction in social assistance benefit program costs in 2010.
| Program | 2010 Upload Benefit |
|---|---|
| ODB | $168 million |
| ODSP Administration | $86 million |
| ODSP Benefits (50% uploaded in 2010) | $303 million |
| OW Benefits (3% uploaded in 2010) | $13 million |
| Total 2010 Upload Benefit | $570 million |
In addition, the uploads committed to through the PMFSDR include up to $125 million annually in court security costs.
This commitment will result in a significant level of stability for the municipal sector. Once fully implemented, these uploads will result in a net benefit to municipalities of $1.5 billion annually.
For further information on the PMFSDR report, see:
www.ontario.ca/provincialmunicipalreview
By 2018, the province will have increased ongoing annual support for municipalities to more than $3.8 billion, an increase of over $2.7 billion, or more than 250 per cent, compared to 2003. This support, in addition to the OMPF, includes:

In addition, the 2009 Budget provided:
Other major municipal infrastructure investments include:
To ensure that the OMPF remains up to date and responsive to changing local circumstances, data elements such as weighted assessment, tax revenue, households, and social program costs have been updated to reflect the most recent data available prior to the annual release of the program (see Appendix B).
In addition, select OMPF grant benchmarks and thresholds have been refined in order to reflect year-over-year changes in assessment and other OMPF data elements.
| Threshold/Benchmark Updates | 2009 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| I. Social Programs Grant | ||
| Reinvestment of National Child Benefit savings | included | included where investments are maintained |
| ODB costs for social assistance recipients | uploaded by province | uploaded by province |
| ODSP administration costs | uploaded by province | uploaded by province |
| ODSP benefit costs | included | included/phased upload started |
| OW benefit costs | included | included/phased upload started |
| Assessment Based Percentage of weighted assessment |
0.165% | 0.156% |
| II. Equalization Grant | ||
| Assessment Equalization | ||
| Average assessment per household | $202,000 | $213,000 |
| Funding for each $10,000 in assessment value | $48 | $47 |
| III. Northern and Rural Communities Grant | ||
| Northern and Rural Social Programs Percentage of tax revenue |
12.0% | 11.5% |
| Stabilization Per household limit |
$150 | $85 |
See Appendix C for a detailed summary of refinements and updates to the program since 2005.
The combined benefit of $1.2 billion in 2010 includes $625 million in OMPF funding through the following:
Provides funding to assist municipalities with limited property assessment and lower household income to support the municipal share of social program costs through two components:
Provides funding to municipalities with limited property assessment through two components:
Provides funding to northern and rural communities to recognize their unique challenges through four components:
Provides funding to rural communities to support policing costs.
This grant provides funding to municipalities to help offset the municipal share of social program costs through two components:
This component provides funding to municipalities with limited property assessment to support the municipal share of eligible social program costs (for a definition of eligible costs, see Appendix A). Funding is provided to municipalities whose costs for these programs exceed the revenue that could be raised by levying a 0.156 per cent property tax rate on their assessment base.
This grant assists municipalities in meeting the municipal portion of the established cost-sharing arrangements for social programs. The province will continue to fund its portion of the cost-shared programs, as well as provide additional funding through the OMPF to help municipalities pay for their share of these arrangements.
Distribution: The Assessment Threshold Component is distributed to upper- and single-tier municipalities.
Example 1.1
Municipality A:
Threshold amount: $27,500,000 x 0.156% = $42,900
Grant Component: $125,000 – $42,900 = $82,100
This grant component provides funding to municipalities with high social program costs relative to the household incomes of their residents. As with the other social programs grant components, this component is designed to support the municipal share of eligible social program costs (for a definition of eligible costs, see Appendix A).
Funding of up to $80 per household is provided to municipalities whose net social program costs exceed 0.60 per cent of the total household incomes of their residents.
Net social program costs for this calculation are:
Total social program costs less the funding provided through the Assessment Threshold Component of the Social Programs Grant and the Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component.
This grant assists municipalities in meeting the municipal portion of the established cost-sharing arrangements for social programs. The province will continue to fund its portion of the cost-shared programs, as well as provide additional funding through the OMPF to help municipalities pay for their share of these arrangements.
Distribution: The Income Threshold Component is distributed to upper- and single-tier municipalities.
Example 1.2
Municipality A
Income Threshold for municipality: $500,000,000 x 0.60% = $3,000,000
Grant Component: $7,000,000 – $3,000,000 = $4,000,000
*For details regarding the Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component see page 13.
This grant provides funding to municipalities that have limited property assessment through two components:
This component provides funding to municipalities with limited property assessment due to lower property values and limited non-residential assessment. Municipalities will receive funding if their total assessment per household is less than $213,000.
An overall assessment differential for each eligible municipality is calculated to determine the grant amount.
If a municipality has a total assessment per household of less than $213,000, it will receive funding based on the following scale:
Every $10,000 increment in a municipality’s total assessment differential will result in an additional $47 in funding.
Distribution: The Assessment Equalization Grant Component is distributed to lower- and single- tier municipalities.
Example 2.1
Municipality A:
Total assessment differential: $30,000 x 5,000 households = $150,000,000
Grant Component: $150,000,000 / $10,000 x $47 = $705,000
This component provides funding to municipalities with limited property assessment due to a significant amount of farmland and managed forest properties.
The grant provides funding equivalent to 300 per cent of the municipal revenue generated from farmland and managed forest assessment where these properties comprise 20 per cent or more of the municipality’s tax base. Municipalities that have between five per cent and 20 per cent of their tax base made up of these properties receive a portion of this funding on a sliding scale.
Every 2.5 per cent increment in taxes generated from farmland and managed forest properties between five per cent and 20 per cent will result in additional funding equal to 50 per cent of the taxes generated by these properties:
| Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment Grant Component | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxes generated by farmland and managed forest properties (%) |
5 | 7.5 | 10 | 12.5 | 15 | 17.5 | 20+ |
| Taxes allocated as grant funding (%) | 0 | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 |
Distribution: This grant is distributed to upper-, lower- and single-tier municipalities. It provides funding of up to 300 per cent of these municipalities’ respective share of revenue generated from these properties.
Example 2.2
Municipality A:
Grant Component: $500,000 x 300% = $1,500,000
Example 2.3
Municipality B:
Grant Component: $250,000 x 50% = $125,000
This grant provides funding to northern and rural communities in recognition of the unique challenges they face.
To support this grant, a Rural and Small Community Measure has been calculated for each municipality to determine the proportion of its population residing in rural areas or small communities (see Appendix A).
The grant has four components:
This component provides funding to municipalities based on the proportion of their population residing in rural areas or small communities.
Municipalities with a Rural and Small Community Measure of 75 per cent or more receive the full per-household amount of $156. Municipalities with a Rural and Small Community Measure between 25 per cent and 75 per cent receive a portion of this funding on a sliding scale.
Every five per cent increment in the Rural and Small Community Measure between 25 per cent and 75 per cent results in an additional $15.60 per household:
| Rural Communities Grant Component | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural and Small Community Measure (%) |
25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75+ |
| Per household amount ($) |
0 | 15.60 | 31.20 | 46.80 | 62.40 | 78.00 | 93.60 | 109.20 | 124.80 | 140.40 | 156.00 |
Distribution: The Rural Communities Grant Component is distributed to lower- and single-tier municipalities.
Example 3.1
Municipality A:
Grant Component: 400 x $156 = $62,400
Example 3.2
Municipality B:
Grant Component: 600 x $78 = $46,800
This component provides funding to all municipalities in northern Ontario (see Appendix A) based on the number of households. The grant per household is $235.
Distribution: The Northern Communities Grant Component is distributed to all northern municipalities.
This component establishes a limit on the share of municipal tax revenue needed to support the municipal share of eligible social program costs in northern and rural communities (see Appendix A).
Funding is provided if the municipal share of eligible social program costs (net of the Social Programs Grant) exceeds a threshold of 11.5 per cent of municipal tax revenue.
All northern municipalities are eligible for this grant if their social program costs exceed the threshold.
Municipalities that are not in the north are eligible to receive the full amount of funding available through this grant component if they have a Rural and Small Community Measure of 75 per cent or greater and their social program costs are greater than the threshold. Municipalities with a Rural and Small Community Measure between 25 per cent and 75 per cent receive a portion of this funding on a sliding scale.
Every five per cent increment in the Rural and Small Community Measure between 25 per cent and 75 per cent results in a 10 per cent increase in funding for eligible costs greater than the 12 per cent tax revenue threshold:
| Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural and Small Community Measure (%) |
25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75+ |
| Residual social program costs funded (%) |
0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 |
For northern and rural communities, this grant provides additional funding to complement the support provided through the Social Programs Grant.
Distribution: The Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component is distributed to upper- and single-tier municipalities.
Example 3.3
Municipality A (northern Ontario):
Residual social program costs above 11.5% threshold: $2,000,000 – $1,150,000 = $850,000
Grant Component: $850,000
Example 3.4
Municipality B (southern Ontario):
Residual social program costs above 11.5% threshold: $4,000,000 – $2,300,000 = $1,700,000
Grant Component: $1,700,000 x 70% = $1,190,000
This component provides funding to municipalities that would otherwise see decreases more than a specified per household amount relative to funding received in 2007. For 2010, the per household amount has been set at $85.
This grant component has been calculated based on the 2010 combined benefit.
Distribution: The Stabilization Grant Component is distributed to upper-, lower- and single-tier municipalities.
This grant provides funding to rural communities to support eligible policing costs (for definition, see Appendix A).
For municipalities with a Rural and Small Community Measure of 75 per cent or more, this grant provides funding equal to:
Municipalities with a Rural and Small Community Measure between 25 per cent and 75 per cent receive a portion of this funding on a sliding scale.
Every five per cent increment in the Rural and Small Community Measure between 25 per cent and 75 per cent results in a five per cent increase in funding for eligible costs between $150 and $750 per household, and a 7.5 per cent increase in funding for eligible costs above $750:
| Police Services Grant | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural and Small Community Measure (%) |
25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75+ |
| Eligible costs above $150 threshold, up to $750, allocated as funding (%) | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 |
| Eligible costs above $750 threshold allocated as funding (%) | 0 | 7.5 | 15.0 | 22.5 | 30.0 | 37.5 | 45.0 | 52.5 | 60.0 | 67.5 | 75.0 |
For municipalities with a Rural and Small Community Measure of less than 75 per cent, the Police Services Grant will be calculated as 50 per cent of their 2002 eligible per household policing costs between $150 and $750, and 75 per cent for costs above $750 — where this approach generates a greater amount than under the standard calculation detailed above. This is incorporated as a transitional measure that applies to only a small number of municipalities.
Distribution: The Police Services Grant is distributed to those municipalities that provide policing services.
Example 4.1
Municipality A:
Grant: ($600,000 x 50%) + ($100,000 x 75%) = $375,000
Example 4.2
Municipality B:
Grant: $400,000 x 25% = $100,000
$25 million in targeted transitional assistance will be provided in 2010.
Transitional assistance is designed to ensure that eligible municipalities receive a guaranteed level of support based on the combined benefit of both OMPF grants and provincial uploads received in 2009. The assistance is targeted so that the guarantee for municipalities in the north is set at a higher level.
For municipalities outside the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), the guaranteed level of support will be at least 80 per cent of the municipality’s 2009 combined benefit. For northern communities, the guaranteed level of support will be at least 95 per cent of the municipality’s 2009 combined benefit.
Transitional assistance will also ensure that no municipality will see a decrease in their combined benefit of larger than $2.5 million in 2010.
| 2010 Transitional Assistance Guarantee Level | |
|---|---|
| Geographic Designation | Guarantee as % of 2009 Combined Benefit |
| Southern Ontario (outside the GTA) | 80% |
| Northern Ontario | 95% |
Distribution: Transitional Assistance is distributed to upper-, lower- and single-tier municipalities.
Example A
Municipality A (northern Ontario):
Transitional Assistance: $237,500 - $180,000 - $40,000 = $17,500
Example B
Municipality B (southern Ontario outside the GTA):
Transitional Assistance: $280,000 - $200,000 - $75,000 = $5,000
OMPF allocations are announced annually in time to support the municipal budget planning process, and payments are flowed in quarterly installments to municipalities. All OMPF allocations are provided to municipalities as unconditional grants.
The Ministry of Finance calculates municipal allocations based on a defined set of data elements (see Appendix B).
Data elements are stable or live. The “stable” data elements are established prior to the annual release of allocations (e.g., assessment data and number of households). Stable data elements are based on the most recent data sets available prior to the allocation year.
A limited number of data elements will be “live” throughout the allocation year. Live data elements will be updated to capture both increases and decreases in costs (e.g., policing costs and social program costs). This will result in adjustments to the Social Programs Grant, the Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component, and the Police Services Grant.
To assist municipalities in understanding their OMPF allocation, the Ministry of Finance has developed a Municipal Workbook that is released to municipalities following the announcement of annual OMPF allocations.
The Municipal Workbook provides detailed grant calculations and includes updated program cost and demographic information used to calculate each OMPF grant component.
To assist municipalities in anticipating the impact of social program cost changes on their OMPF allocation, the Ministries of Finance, Community and Social Services, and Children and Youth Services have developed a Social Programs Costs Report that is released to municipal service managers and municipalities following the announcement of annual OMPF allocations.
The Social Programs Cost Report provides details on:
Funding provided through the OMPF is distributed to upper-, lower- and single-tier municipalities based on the level of government that is responsible for the service supported by the grant or grant component:
| Tier Distribution of Funding | Upper-Tier | Lower-Tier | Single-Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Social Programs Grant | |||
| 1. Assessment Threshold | x | x | |
| 2. Income Threshold | x | x | |
| II. Equalization Grant | |||
| 1. Assessment Equalization | x | x | |
| 2. Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment | x | x | x |
| III. Northern and Rural Communities Grant | |||
| 1. Rural Communities | x | x | |
| 2. Northern Communities | x | ||
| 3. Northern and Rural Social Programs | x | x | |
| 4. Stabilization | x | x | x |
| IV. Police Services Grant | x | x | x |
This Technical Guide and other 2010 OMPF supporting materials are posted in English and French on the Ministry of Finance website at:
www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ompf/2010
www.fin.gov.on.ca/fr/budget/ompf/2010
If you require additional information regarding your 2010 OMPF allocation, you may e-mail your inquiries and your contact phone number to:
Alternatively, you may contact your local Municipal Services Office of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing:
|
Municipal Services Offices Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing |
|
|---|---|
CENTRAL: |
General Inquiry: (416) 585-6226 |
WESTERN: |
General Inquiry: (519) 873-4020 |
EASTERN: |
General Inquiry: (613) 548-4304 |
NORTHWESTERN: |
General Inquiry: (807) 475-1651 |
NORTHEASTERN: |
General Inquiry: (705) 564-0120 |
Eligible municipal social program costs refer to the costs that municipalities are responsible for under existing cost-sharing arrangements with the province. Social programs that are eligible for inclusion in determining a municipality’s total social program costs for the OMPF include:
In 2008, the province fully uploaded ODB costs and uploaded ODSP administration costs in 2009. In 2010 the province will begin the phased upload of ODSP and OW program benefit program costs. Changing municipal cost shares are noted below.
| Municipal Cost Shares | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program | Upload Status | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2018 |
| ODB | Upload Completed in 2008 | 20% | 0% | ||||
| ODSP Administration | Upload Completed in 2009 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |||
| ODSP Benefits | Phased upload begins in 2010 (will be completed in 2011) | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 0% | |
| OW Benefits | Phased upload begins in 2010 (will be completed in 2018) | 20% | 20% | 20% | 19.4% | 18.8% | 0% |
Eligible police costs include policing services provided by the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) or a local force to meet the service standards defined in the Police Services Act.
Non-eligible police costs include bylaw enforcement and cases where service levels exceed those required by the Police Services Act.
Northern municipalities are those that lie within any of the following districts: Algoma, Cochrane, Kenora, Manitoulin, Nipissing, Parry Sound, Rainy River, Sudbury, Thunder Bay and Timiskaming.
In this document, assessment refers to the total assessment for a municipality weighted by the tax ratio for each class of property plus payments-in-lieu of property taxes (PILs) made by either the provincial or federal government. (An equivalent PIL assessment is calculated by dividing actual PIL revenues by the residential tax rate in each municipality.)
The Rural and Small Community Measure represents the proportion of a municipality’s population residing in rural areas or small communities. This approach recognizes that some municipalities include a mix of rural and non-rural areas.
The measure is based on Statistics Canada data from the 2006 Census and is calculated as follows:
Example
Rural and Small Community Measure = 700 / 1,000 = 70%
Note 1: OMPF calculations incorporate a minor adjustment to Statistics Canada’s classification of “small community.” This adjustment provides a transition between the small community and urban center classification for areas with a population between 10,000 and 12,000 and is made on a sliding scale:
| Percentage of Area Population Included as a Small Community | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area population | 10,000 | 10,500 | 11,000 | 11,500 | 12,000 |
| Percentage | 100 | 75 | 50 | 25 | 0 |
| Data | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Live Program Costs | ||
| Social Assistance Child Care | 2010 projections based on 2009 actuals and service contract amounts, and 2009 inter-municipal cost shares |
Ministry of Community and Social Services (MCSS) Ministry of Children and Youth Services (MCYS) Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) |
| Reinvestment of National Child Benefit Savings | Based on 2007 levels where municipal investments are maintained | MCSS/MCYS/MMAH |
| Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) | 2010 projected costs based on 2008 actuals | OPP |
| Municipal Police | 2010 projected costs based on 2008 actuals | Projection based on municipal Financial Information Returns (FIR) |
| Other Program Costs | ||
| Social Housing | 2002 devolved costs and 2009 inter-municipal cost shares |
MCSS/MMAH |
| Weighted Assessment | 2010 returned roll and 2010 starting tax ratios |
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) and municipal tax rate bylaws |
| Farmland and Managed Forest Tax Revenue | 2009 year-end data from 2010 Market Change Profile (MCP) and 2009 tax rates | |
| Own Purpose Taxation Payments in Lieu Revenues |
2008 | Municipal FIR |
| Demographic & Income Data | ||
| Number of Households | 2009 | MPAC Enumeration |
| Rural and Small Community Measure | 2006 | Census, Statistics Canada |
| Total Household Income | 2006 | Census, Statistics Canada |
The following table summarizes the refinements and updates to OMPF grant parameters:
| Threshold/Benchmark Updates |
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Social Programs Grant | ||||||
| Reinvestment of National Child Benefit savings | not included | included | included | included | included | included where investments are maintained |
| ODB costs for social assistance recipients |
included | included | included | uploaded by province | uploaded by province | uploaded by province |
| ODSP administration costs | included | included | included | included | uploaded by province | uploaded by province |
| ODSP benefit costs | included | included | included | included | included | included/phased upload started |
| OW benefit costs | included | included | included | included | included | included/phased upload started |
| 1. Assessment Based Percentage of weighted assessment |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.178% | 0.176% | 0.165% | 0.156% |
| 2. Income Based Per household limit |
n/a | $35 | $80 | $80 | $80 | $80 |
| Average income threshold | n/a | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| II. Equalization Grant | ||||||
| 1. Assessment Equalization Average Assessment per household |
$170,000 | $185,000 | $187,000 | $190,000 | $202,000 | $213,000 |
| Funding for each 10,000 in assessment value | $62 | $60 | $58 | $54 | $48 | $47 |
| 2. Farmland and Managed Forest Assessment | Single-tier: up to 150% of single-tier revenue Lower-tier: up to 150% of total upper- and lower tier revenue Upper-tier: Not eligible |
Single-, lower- and upper-tier: up to 300% of their respective revenues | Single-, lower- and upper-tier: up to 300% of their respective revenues | Single-, lower- and upper-tier: up to 300% of their respective revenues | Single-, lower- and upper-tier: up to 300% of their respective revenues | Single-, lower- and upper-tier: up to 300% of their respective revenues |
| III. Northern and Rural Social Programs Grant Component | ||||||
| 1. Rural Communities Per household funding |
$150 | $153 | $156 | $156 | $156 | $156 |
| 2. Northern Communities Per household funding |
$225 | $230 | $235 | $235 | $235 | $235 |
| 3. Northern and Rural Social Programs Percentage of tax revenue |
15% | 14% | 13% | 12.5 % | 12% | 11.5% |
| 4. Stabilization (hh=household) |
$150/hh relative to 2004 CRF and based on 2005 funding levels | $150/hh relative to 2004 CRF and based on 2006 funding levels | $150/hh relative to 2004 CRF and based on 2007 funding levels | $150/hh relative to 2004 CRF and based on 2008 funding levels | $150/hh relative to 2004 CRF and based on 2009 funding levels | $85/hh relative to 2007 OMPF and based on 2010 funding levels |