The Ontario Government has reduced taxes significantly over the past five years. Significant additional cuts are being proposed and will continue to be made in the future.
|
Tax Cuts Now and Low Taxes in the Future
|
Tax cuts are an important part of a balanced program to promote healthy economic growth, together with expenditure management and debt reduction. Today, balanced budget and taxpayer protection legislation guarantees the people of Ontario that their government is no longer running deficits and that tax increases are a thing of the past. They also have the government's continued commitment to cutting taxes as a way of maintaining and improving our economy and our competitive position in a global marketplace.
In 1995, Ontario's personal income tax rate had reached an all-time high, at 58 per cent of basic federal tax. At that time, Ontario's personal income taxes were among the highest in North America.
* Where applicable, statements made in this paper concerning measures proposed in this Budget are conditional on the approval of relevant legislation by the Legislature.
Since then, Ontario's income tax has been cut dramatically. In addition to significant tax rate decreases, Ontario has also moved to increase the value of certain non-refundable tax credits-for example, those recognizing the extra costs associated with pursuing an education or having a disability-and to index tax brackets and other non-refundable tax credits to Ontario's inflation rate. Taxpayers with lowand middle incomes have benefited the most from these cuts.
Businesses have benefited from the Province's reductions to profit-insensitive taxes. Ontario's payroll tax was eliminated for 88 per cent of private-sector employers and reduced for all other private-sector employers. Business education property taxes have been cut and municipal discretion to shift the local property tax burden onto businesses has been limited.
Small businesses have had their income tax rate cut, and the number of businesses that qualify for this lower rate has been increased. Ontario's general rate of corporate income tax is being reduced from the highest among industrialized countries to a level below all U.S. states.
As a result of the tax cuts made by the Ontario Government, the Ontario economy is much more competitive and much stronger than it was five years ago.
Real GDP per person has grown by a remarkable 16.3 per cent in Ontario over the past four years. This is one of the strongest growth periods since 1960 for this important economic indicator. In the period following the introduction of this government's personal income tax cuts, Ontario's growth in real GDP per person has surpassed the average for industrialized countries.
Ontario's job growth has also been exceptional since tax cuts were first announced. Ontario's total employment has grown 16 per cent, compared to only 10.6 per cent in the rest of Canada, and 8.5 per cent in the United States.
This improved performance has been a significant achievement, but clearly there is still more to do.
The Ontario Government's recent tax cuts come on the heels of 30 years of steady increases in tax rates. Taxes, when combined for all levels of government in Canada, rose from under 27 per cent of GDP in the 1960s to over 37 per cent in the 1990s. Over the same period, productivity growth and growth in the standard of living for people in Ontario declined.
The Ontario economy has been performing exceptionally well in the past five years, but there remains a lot of lost ground to recover. Real disposable income per person in Ontario actually fell from $19,600 in 1989 to $17,800 in 1996. This decrease resulted from a combination of job losses, weak salary growth and rising taxes prior to 1996.
People in Ontario, comparing their situation to that of friends and relatives living in the United States, are aware that their incomes have not grown nearly as much. At the beginning of the 1980s, the average level of personal disposable income in Ontario was close to 90 per cent of the U.S. average. While it has begun to rebound in recent years, it is still only about 70 per cent.
Higher business investment is critical to more rapid implementation of new technology, productivity growth and increases in the real earnings of Ontario workers. Canada cannot achieve the rate of investment it needs unless its corporate tax rates are competitive.
Governments in Canada have just begun to take action on the corporate tax side. Even after the initial reductions in corporate income tax rates that have occurred in the past year, Canadian corporate income tax rates remain among the highest in the world.
The high level of corporate taxation in Canada is one reason why Canadian investors have been moving their capital out of the country. In the years from 1995 to 2000, Canadian investors increased their foreign investments by $255 billion, which is $83 billion more than foreign investors brought into Canada.
The first stage of the Ontario Government's tax cuts, starting in 1996, focused on personal income tax cuts.
This focus reflected an economy that suffered from severely depressed demand conditions, inadequate incentives to earn income and take risks, and high unemployment. Personal income tax cuts provide a strong short-term demand stimulus and support higher long-term productivity growth.
On January 1, 1996, the Ontario personal income tax rate was 58 per cent of basic federal tax. By July 1, 1998, Ontario's income tax rate had been cut to 40.5 per cent of basic federal tax.
In addition to cutting the tax rate by 30 per cent, the government also increased Ontario's personal credits. These measures benefited all taxpayers. As well, the Ontario Tax Reduction program was enhanced, which amplified these tax cuts for individuals with lower incomes.
In its 1999 Budget, the government committed to further personal income tax reductions and implemented an additional five per cent across-the-board rate reduction. This brought Ontario's personal income tax rate down to 38.5 per cent of basic federal tax.
The 2000 Budget announced a new "Made-for-Ontario" income tax system, one that sets Ontario's tax brackets and tax rates independently of the federal government's income tax system. Straight away, the government used its new flexibility to implement important policies for the benefit of Ontario's taxpayers and economy.
As well, the government implemented full protection against inflation-induced tax increases for the taxpayers of Ontario for the first time in 15 years. In this taxation year alone, Ontario's fully indexed personal income tax system is protecting Ontario taxpayers from $290 million of hidden tax increases. People in Ontario will not pay more Ontario tax just because their salaries keep pace with inflation.
The 2000 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review included more new tax cut announcements for the benefit of Ontario taxpayers. Tax credits for individuals attending post-secondary school, individuals with disabilities and the people who support them were all enriched. As well, the plan to reduce the taxable proportion of capital gains was accelerated in the 2000 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review. Effective October 18, 2000, the taxable proportion of capital gains reported for Ontario income tax purposes dropped to 50 per cent.
Additional government actions have further supported working families. The 1998 Budget introduced the Ontario Child Care Supplement for Working Families, which, by providing a refundable tax credit of $1,020 for each child under age seven, had the effect of increasing the tax savings for low- and moderate-income working families. In 1999, the annual benefit was increased by $80 per child to $1,100 per child under age seven. The single-parent supplement was introduced in the 2000 Budget, increasing the maximum benefit for single-parent families by $210 per child to $1,310 per child under age seven.
Beginning in 2002, Ontario's personal income tax rates are proposed to be cut again.
In 1999, the Government of Ontario committed to provide Ontario taxpayers with an additional $4 billion in tax cut benefits over five years through a 20 per cent personal income tax reduction. Full implementation of the measures proposed in this Budget, combined with the personal income tax cuts announced in the 1999 and 2000 Ontario Budgets, would mean:
| Income Group 2 | Ontario Taxpayers | Estimated Average PIT Savings |
|---|---|---|
| Less than $16,160 | 10% | 69.6% |
| $16,160 - $21,115 | 10% | 42.6% |
| $21,115 - $26,015 | 10% | 33.2% |
| $26,015 - $30,945 | 10% | 31.1% |
| $30,945 - $36,400 | 10% | 31.4% |
| $36,400 - $42,320 | 10% | 28.1% |
| $42,320 - $49,765 | 10% | 24.8% |
| $49,765 - $60,455 | 10% | 22.5% |
| $60,455 - $82,510 | 10% | 24.7% |
| $82,510 - $85,680 | 1% | 25.2% |
| $85,680 - $89,160 | 1% | 24.0% |
| $89,160 - $93,670 | 1% | 23.2% |
| $93,670 - $98,540 | 1% | 22.4% |
| $98,540 - $104,670 | 1% | 21.4% |
| $104,670 - $113,695 | 1% | 19.7% |
| $113,695 - $128,545 | 1% | 18.3% |
| $128,545 - $157,190 | 1% | 16.3% |
| $157,190 - $232,690 | 1% | 13.6% |
| $232,690 - $347,700 | 0.5% | 11.3% |
| $347,700 and up | 0.5% | 10.2% |
| Total | 100% | 32.1% |
(1) Includes Ontario's 1999 and 2000 rate cuts, indexation at estimated 2003 parameters, reduction of the capital gains
inclusion rate to one-half and enhancement of tax credits for disability and education. Savings have been calculated in
comparison to the tax system in place after Ontario's original PIT cuts.
(2) The income groups divide Ontario taxpayers (before Ontario's original personal income tax cuts) into: nine deciles, each
consisting of 560,000 taxpayers, with incomes up to $82,510; nine percentiles, each containing 56,000 taxpayers, with
incomes between $82,510 and $232,690; and two half-percentiles, consisting of 28,000 taxpayers each, with incomes over
$232,690.
In 2000, the Ontario Government announced a series of tax cuts that would focus directly on investment, to boost long-term job creation and productivity growth.
Capital is highly mobile internationally, and it goes to the countries where it earns the highest after-tax rate of return.
In this Budget, the Ontario Government proposes to legislate a firm schedule to deliver the corporate tax cut plan it announced in last year's budget. These cuts would be completed in 2005.
The capital tax discourages investment in capital, when more capital per worker is what is needed to boost productivity and standards of living. The capital tax is unrelated to profits, making it a fixed cost on businesses. In periods of economic slowdown when businesses are forced to cut costs, the capital tax forces them to cut in the areas where they have flexibility, which is chiefly wages. Therefore, the capital tax is a potential job killer.
The Business Tax Review Panel noted that, on an international basis, Canada is almost unique in having capital taxes. The Panel believed that the capital tax serves as a deterrent to attracting international investment.
The Business Tax Review Panel recommended that Ontario eliminate the capital tax for regular corporations and financial institutions. As a first step, it recommended that Ontario introduce a capital tax deduction for the first $5 million of taxable capital.
This Budget proposes to provide a $5 million capital tax deduction for all businesses effective January 1, 2002. This would increase capital available for reinvestment, simplify the tax system and remove capital tax liability for over 11,000 small and medium-sized businesses.
In order to achieve certain economic and social objectives, Ontario provides targeted tax incentives, typically as deductions or tax credits, which reduce the tax an individual or corporation would otherwise have to pay. Targeted tax incentives can be an affordable and effective mechanism for achieving policy objectives.
However, once introduced, tax incentives tend to become fixtures of the tax system. Unlike other forms of government spending, they are not subject to regular review. The Business Tax Review Panel noted that, while tax incentives can be very effective, they add a source of complexity to the tax system and need to be reviewed to ensure that they continue to achieve the original policy intent.
The Province will conduct a review of tax incentives to determine if they are still necessary and effective in an environment of significantly reduced tax rates and lower tax burdens, and to address the concerns raised by the Business Tax Review Panel.
The government will also review certain targeted taxes, such as the Corporate Minimum Tax and the Tax for Fuel Conservation, to ensure that such measures are still appropriate.
The Government of Ontario has repeatedly called on the federal government to follow Ontario's lead by enhancing the competitive economic advantage of Ontario and Canada, and improving disposable income by cutting federal taxes further.
Ontario collects less than one-third of the income taxes paid by the people of Ontario. If the income tax burden on Ontario families is to be reduced significantly, then the federal government must also act, since the bulk of personal income taxes are levied by the federal government.
A couple with two children and net income of $60,000 from two earners would save $2,345 in Ontario personal income tax, or more than 50 per cent when the changes proposed in this Budget are added to tax cuts announced in previous budgets. Federal personal income tax cuts, when fully implemented, would save this family $1,650, or 20 per cent. At that time, this family would pay about $3 in federal tax for every $1 of Ontario tax.
A couple with two children and net income of $30,000 from one earner would pay $1,635 less Ontario income tax when the changes proposed in this Budget are added to those announced in previous Ontario budgets. They would no longer pay Ontario income tax. In contrast, this family would continue to pay federal income tax of $2,140, even after the proposed federal cuts deliver $760, or 26 per cent, in income tax savings for this family.
A single individual earning $90,000 would save $5,130, or 39 per cent, from Ontario's personal income tax cuts, including those proposed in this Budget. Fully implemented federal income tax cuts would save this individual $4,310, or only about 20 per cent. At that time, this individual would pay more than twice as much federal tax as Ontario tax.
Federal personal income taxes remain, on average, more than double the level of Ontario's personal income taxes, even after taking into consideration past and planned federal income tax cuts. With the measures proposed in this Budget, more than 735,000 individuals and families in Ontario would not pay Ontario personal income tax but would still pay federal income tax.
While Ontario's top marginal rate has been cut by over 20 per cent since 1995, the top marginal rate of federal tax has dropped by only about seven per cent. The relatively small cut in the top marginal rate of federal tax is a source of particular concern.
At all income levels, the federal government must do more to get federal personal income taxes down.
Canada's corporate income tax rates are also high compared to competing jurisdictions. Investment is very mobile, and companies will invest in Canada only if their after-tax income is competitive with other countries.
Ontario has set a target for a single lower overall rate of eight per cent for all large businesses by 2005-this is a 48 per cent cut in the general rate and a 40 per cent cut in the manufacturing and processing rate. By comparison, the federal government is cutting the general corporate rate by 24 per cent-only half of the Ontario cut.
The federal government needs to cut corporate rates deeper to improve our international competitiveness. If the federal government met the challenge in the 2000 Ontario Budget to match our corporate rate cuts, the combined federal-provincial rate, at 23 per cent, would be among the lowest in the world.
It is also time for the federal government to reform the manner in which it manages the nation's Employment Insurance (EI) program. The federal government continues to use EI premiums contributed by employers and employees as own-source revenue. It should, instead, establish a separate account for EI, which, like the Canada Pension Plan, would be externally managed and invested in market securities.
At the same time, EI premium rates continue to be unnecessarily high. Ontario has called on the federal government to reduce EI premiums immediately to below $2 per $100 of insurable earnings. This would fully offset the CPP contribution increases that have taken effect in 2001, and would ensure that there would be no further increase in the federal payroll tax burden this year.
The following sections provide information on the taxation measures proposed in the Budget. For a precise description of these measures, the reader is advised to consult the amending legislation.
This Budget proposes further cuts to Ontario personal income tax rates.
Ontario's two-tiered surtax is calculated as a percentage of basic Ontario tax in excess of specified amounts. In 2001, the first surtax tier does not apply to taxpayers with incomes of less than $53,650 and the second surtax tier does not apply to taxpayers with incomes of less than $63,365. Automatic indexation of the surtax thresholds ensures that these income levels will increase to keep pace with inflation.
To eliminate the surtax payable by taxpayers who pay only the first-tier surtax, it is proposed that the basic Ontario tax threshold above which the first-tier surtax applies be raised to the same level as the threshold for the second surtax tier.
As a result of this proposed change, about one-third of current surtax payers—more than 340,000 individuals—would no longer pay the personal income surtax.
The Ontario Tax Reduction reduces or eliminates Ontario personal income tax payable by taxpayers with low and moderate incomes. Automatic indexation of the Ontario Tax Reduction amounts ensures that taxpayers who benefit from the program will continue to do so, even if their incomes increase by the rate of inflation.
With the proposed changes to the first and middle tax rates, about 75,000 additional low-income taxpayers will be removed from Ontario's tax rolls and 580,000 additional taxpayers with modest incomes will have their Ontario tax further reduced by the Ontario Tax Reduction.
For 2001, Ontario alternative minimum tax (AMT) will be calculated as 38.75 per cent of the additional tax attributable to the federal AMT calculation, and would be added to Ontario tax calculated under the regular rules. The calculation for 2001 will be expressed as:
Ontario AMT = Ontario Tax + 38.75 per cent x (Federal AMT - Federal Tax)
The 2001 rate change for the Ontario AMT calculation reflects the change to Ontario's tax rates and the proposed change to federal tax rates.
As a result of the changes to Ontario tax rates proposed in this Budget, the appropriate percentage for 2002 would be 37.81 per cent.
A claim for medical expenses paid for a dependant, other than a spouse, must be reduced where the dependant's net income exceeds the basic personal amount. For Ontario purposes, the claim made for 2001 by an individual for the medical expenses of a dependant will be reduced by 26.35 per cent of the amount by which the dependant's net income exceeds the basic personal amount. This reflects changes to Ontario's tax rates and proposed changes to federal tax rates.
As a result of the changes proposed to Ontario tax rates in this Budget, for 2002, the claim made by an individual for medical expenses of a dependant would be reduced by 25.71 per cent of the amount by which the dependant's net income exceeds the basic personal amount.
The Budget proposes a refundable tax credit, effective for the 2002 and subsequent taxation years, that would be provided in respect of kindergarten, elementary and secondary tuition fees at independent schools in Ontario. This credit would apply to the first $7,000 per child of tuition fees exclusively and would not include, for example, expenses for books, sports, uniforms, computers, travel or boarding. Consultations will identify the appropriate framework for establishing eligibility for this credit.
This tax credit is proposed to be phased in over a five-year period, beginning with tuition fees paid in respect of instruction commencing after 2001. The proposed credit rates are:
| Taxation Year | Tax Credit Rate |
|---|---|
| 2002 | 10% |
| 2003 | 20% |
| 2004 | 30% |
| 2004 | 40% |
| 2006 and subsequent taxation years | 50% |
As announced in the 2000 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review, enhancements are proposed to certain Ontario non-refundable credits. These enhancements would be effective January 1, 2001.
| Non-refundable Credit | 2000 Amount |
Proposed 2001 Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Disability credit | $4,293 | $6,000 |
| Caregiver credit | $2,386 | $3,500 |
| Infirm dependant credit | $2,386 | $3,500 |
| Disability credit supplement for children with severe disabilities | $2,941 | $3,500 |
| Education credits | ||
| Amount per month of full-time enrolment | $200 | $400 |
| Amount per month of part-time enrolment | $60 | $120 |
These Ontario non-refundable tax credits are calculated using the lowest Ontario tax rate for the appropriate taxation year.
The 2000 Budget announced the government's intention to cut both the general corporate income tax rate and the tax rate on income from manufacturing and processing, mining, logging, farming and fishing to eight per cent by 2005. That Budget presented the first two stages of the tax cuts, which were subsequently enacted into law. Those tax cuts reduced the general corporate income tax rate from 15.5 per cent before the 2000 Budget to 14 per cent on January 1, 2001. The tax rate on income from manufacturing and processing, mining, logging, farming and fishing was cut from 13.5 per cent to 12 per cent over the same period.
The following table outlines the government's proposed plan for implementing the remaining tax cuts to achieve the eight per cent tax rates.
| General Corporate Income Tax Rate* |
Tax Rate on Income from Manufacturing and Processing, Mining, Logging, Farming and Fishing* |
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Tax Rate | 14% | 12% |
| Proposed Tax Rate: | ||
| January 1, 2002 | 12.5% | 11% |
| January 1, 2003 | 11% | 10% |
| January 1, 2004 | 9.5% | 9% |
| January 1, 2005 | 8% | 8% |
*All tax rate reductions would be prorated for taxation years straddling the effective dates.
In 1999, the capital tax exemption for small businesses was increased to $2 million of taxable capital, with reduced capital tax rates applying to taxable capital between $2 million and $4 million. The full $4 million threshold was to be phased in by January 1, 2003. Currently, businesses with taxable paid-up capital between $2 million and $3.2 million are eligible for reduced capital tax rates. It is proposed that:
The proposed $5 million capital tax deductions for both regular and financial institutions would be prorated for taxation years straddling January 1, 2002.
One of Ontario's most important tax-based incentives for research and development (R&D) is the Super Allowance, which provides over $100 million in benefits to R&D performing firms.
In its 2000 budget, the federal government stated that provincial deductions for R&D in excess of actual expenditures would be treated as taxable government assistance. This federal action, if applied to the Super Allowance, would raise the cost of R&D investments in Ontario and could result in lower R&D expenditures in the province. Ontario businesses have expressed their concern over the adverse impact that the federal measure would have on the cost of R&D.
Recognizing the legitimate concerns expressed by Ontario's R&D industry, the 2000 Ontario Budget announced that Ontario would not adopt the federal measure. In this Budget, Ontario intends to take further action to reduce the adverse impact of the federal measure on Ontario R&D performers.
Ontario is proposing to suspend the R&D Super Allowance for two years and, in its place, allow corporations to exclude from Ontario taxable income the portion of the federal investment tax credit that relates to qualifying Ontario Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) expenditures.
Ontario calls upon the federal government to revisit its 2000 Budget proposal and to ensure that federal legislation does not target Ontario's R&D Super Allowance.
As proposed in the 2000 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review, for dispositions of property on or after October 18, 2000, the inclusion rate for capital gains and losses would be reduced to 50 per cent.
The rebate program for alternative fuel vehicles provides purchasers or long-term lessors of qualifying alternative fuel cars with a retail sales tax rebate of up to $1,000. This program currently does not extend to the newly developed electric hybrid cars.
As a result, legislation will be introduced to extend the retail sales tax rebate to qualifying electric hybrid cars. The Ministry of Finance welcomes input from the industry. In general, a qualifying electric hybrid car would be one that combines an electric traction motor with another power unit, such as a conventional gas or diesel engine. To qualify for the proposed rebate, an electric hybrid car would be required to have:
It is proposed that qualifying electric hybrid cars delivered after May 9, 2001 be eligible for this rebate.
The government proposes to exempt from retail sales tax audio books purchased by people who are legally blind. The proposed measure would be effective on proclamation.
The government will consult with the Canadian National Institute for the Blind on implementation details.
Succession duties were eliminated in 1979, in respect of persons who died after April 10 of that year. However, in certain instances, succession duties may continue to apply to estates of persons who died on or before that date. For example, the amount of an inheritance or the identity of a beneficiary may be uncertain where a life interest was granted to a spouse and the remainder interest to their children. There are fewer than 200 remaining estates for which payment of succession duties has been deferred until the occurrence of a future event.
In order to bring succession duties to an end, it is proposed that no further succession duty would be payable on or after May 9, 2001, other than amounts due before that day.
It is proposed that, effective June 25, 2001, the ad valorem component of the brewers' basic fee would be eliminated.
To encourage the restoration and preservation of heritage buildings, the government proposes to give municipalities the ability to provide property tax relief to owners of buildings that are designated under the Ontario Heritage Act as being of architectural or historical value.
The government will consult with stakeholders to develop eligibility criteria and a relief mechanism that is equitable for property owners and administratively feasible for municipalities. It is proposed that this relief mechanism would take effect on January 1, 2002.
In 1998, the Province created the "new multi-residential property class" to enable municipalities to apply a lower tax rate to newly built rental apartment buildings. If adopted by a municipality, this class would apply to newly built multi-residential properties for the first eight years after construction, and then these properties would move into the regular multi-residential class.
To provide a greater incentive for the development of new affordable rental housing, the government intends to extend the time horizon of the new multi-residential property class from eight years to 35 years.
This change would take effect on January 1, 2002.
On April 1, 2001, Ontario became a member of the International Registration Plan (IRP). Ontario's IRP membership will enhance the competitive position of Ontario's truck and bus industries by giving them improved access to U.S. markets.
To accommodate Ontario's membership in the IRP, Ontario proposes to amend the Retail Sales Tax Act as it applies to trucks and buses registered under the IRP and used in Ontario. Ontario is planning to implement an annual prorated sales tax to be collected at the time of registration. This would replace the retail sales tax normally applicable to these multijurisdictional vehicles. This taxation system is used in British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
In addition, under this proposal, trailers, repair parts and labour services for multijurisdictional trucks and buses registered under the IRP and used in Ontario would be exempt from retail sales tax at the time of purchase. The proposed rates have been developed to account for the Ontario proportion of the retail sales tax on trailers, repair parts and labour.
The proposed measure would be payable each year upon registration of a multijurisdictional truck or bus, and would be calculated based on the vehicle's purchase price and the proportional distance travelled in Ontario by the vehicle during the previous year. The applicable tax rate would vary, depending on when the vehicle was acquired.
| Tax rate for multijurisdictional trucks registered under IRP (%) | Tax rate for multijurisdictional buses registered under IRP (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition year | 3.669 | 3.285 |
| First calendar year following the acquisition year | 2.876 | 2.419 |
| Second calendar year following the acquisition year | 2.307 | 1.814 |
| Third calendar year following the acquisition year | 1.901 | 1.390 |
| Fourth calendar year following the acquisition year | 1.612 | 1.093 |
| Fifth calendar year following the acquisition year | 1.570 | 1.036 |
| Sixth calendar year following the acquisition year | 1.483 | 0.949 |
| Seventh calendar year following the acquisition year | 1.447 | 0.913 |
| Eighth calendar year following the acquisition year | 1.448 | 0.911 |
| Ninth and subsequent calendar years following the acquisition year | 1.475 | 0.934 |
Under this proposal, multijurisdictional trucks and buses previously purchased in Ontario may qualify for a transitional credit against the annual prorated tax. Rules would also be introduced to address taxation where there is a change in the use of a truck or bus.
The government proposes to implement the modified retail sales tax system for multijurisdictional vehicles as of October 1, 2001. The government will be seeking industry input on this proposal.
It is proposed that technical amendments relating to professional corporations be made to the Business Corporations Act. The amendments would clarify that the liability for professional negligence of a shareholder of a professional corporation is not affected by the existence of the corporation or the fact that the corporation is a member of a partnership or limited liability partnership.
In addition, technical amendments are proposed to be made to various statutes governing regulated professionals to provide that the conditions, prohibitions and restrictions that currently apply to individuals who practise the particular profession would also apply to professional corporations.
To improve administrative effectiveness and enforcement, to maintain the integrity and the equity of the tax system, and also to enhance legislative clarity, various other amendments will be proposed to the following Ontario statutes:
This Budget builds on the measures introduced by the government in previous Budgets. Cutting red tape and improving customer service is an ongoing job, and this Budget introduces several new improvement initiatives.
Taxpayers have the right to demand and expect professionalism and courtesy in the administration of their tax system.
In order to enhance service quality and increase accountability, Ontario is developing specific service standards for tax administration. These standards, when finalized, will be used to measure our performance in administering tax laws with fairness, courtesy and common sense.
Results will be reported to the public annually, allowing taxpayers to hold the government and its employees accountable for the quality of service provided and the professional manner in which taxpayers are treated.
Consultations with key stakeholders on draft tax administration service standards will begin shortly, aimed at finalizing standards by September 1, 2001.
Business people in Ontario want to create jobs, not fill out unnecessary or complicated paperwork. The following proposed measures would help to reduce the paperwork that businesses are required to file, while ensuring all taxpayers are treated fairly.
Ontario recognizes the need for simpler and more effective definitions and rules in the retail sales tax system, such as those relating to the taxation of computer software. To that end, Ontario will consult with taxpayers and other interested groups on potential measures for a simpler retail sales tax.
The Business Tax Review Panel recommended that the Province explore ways of simplifying and consolidating the audit process. The following measures are proposed:
The government recognizes and values the role that small businesses play in providing feedback and suggestions on ways to improve customer service and cut red tape. The following measures will help foster a better working relationship between the tax administration and its customers and stakeholders.
In support of the government's goal for electronic service delivery, the following customer service measures will be implemented by 2002.
It is proposed that various pieces of financial services legislation be amended to eliminate barriers to competitiveness, reduce costs of compliance, and increase efficiency and effectiveness.
Thirteen amendments are proposed to streamline the regulatory requirements for co-operatives. These amendments are intended to address the commitment in the 2000 Budget to streamline co-operative regulatory requirements. The proposed changes include:
It is proposed that this Act be changed to permit the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario (DICO) to invoice credit unions and caisses populaires for premiums within 120 days of the start of their fiscal year. This would allow premiums to be based on the previous year's audited financial statements.
It is proposed that the list of permissible investments for Ontario-incorporated insurance companies be updated to give provincially incorporated companies more flexibility in planning their investment strategies. Further amendments to insurance legislation are being considered to harmonize Ontario investment standards with those in other Canadian jurisdictions.
Proposed changes to the Insurance Act and the Registered Insurance Brokers Act would remove restrictions on foreign ownership of corporate agents and adjusters and brokerages.
Changes are proposed to eliminate overlap and duplication in the regulation of the loan and trust sector. With these changes, the Province would no longer incorporate loan or trust companies. After a transition period, only federally incorporated companies would be able to operate in Ontario.
A proposed change would exempt from regulatory requirements foreign banks that are allowed to operate in Canada under the federal Bank Act.
Eight changes are proposed to clarify securities legislation, to reduce the cost of compliance for market participants, and to harmonize requirements with those of other Canadian jurisdictions. For example, a proposed amendment to permit the use of electronic communications for delivery of shareholder meeting materials (proxy material and information circulars) would reduce issuer mailings and associated costs.
| Proposed Benefits to Taxpayers: 2001 Budget Impact Summary | 2001-02 Benefit ($ Millions) |
Full-Year Benefit ($ Millions) |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Income Tax | ||
| 20% PIT cut, remaining steps | 60 | 975 |
| In-year measure to enhance certain non-refundable tax credits | 60 | 60 |
| Equity in Education tax credit | 15 | 300 |
| Corporations Tax | ||
| Corporate Income Tax rate cut, remaining steps | 10 | 2,200 |
| Reducing the Capital Tax | 4 | 180 |
| Capital Gains | ||
| Accelerating the Capital Gains Reduction (62% to 50%) | 520 | 500 |
| Retail Sales Tax | ||
| Exempting audio books for people who are blind | 1 | 3 |
| Extending the Rebate for Alternative Fuel Vehicles to electric hybrids | 1 | 1 |
| Succession Duty Act Supplementary Provisions Act | 1 | 2 |
| Making the Tax System Fairer | ||
| Eliminating ad valorem component of brewers' basic fee | 6 | 8 |
| Total Benefits to Taxpayers | 678 | 4,229 |