After the election in October 2003, the Premier-designate asked former Provincial Auditor Erik Peters to conduct an independent review of the Province's finances. Mr. Peters concluded that Ontario faced a projected deficit of $5.6 billion for 2003-04, excluding potential risks to the fiscal outlook of up to $1 billion that could cause the deficit to worsen by year-end.
The 2003 Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review, released by the Minister of Finance in December, showed that the deficit identified by Mr. Peters was not a one-year anomaly in an otherwise healthy fiscal situation. It was a structural deficit caused by several years of much faster growth in program spending than in government tax revenues. Unless addressed, this fiscal imbalance would lead to continued chronic and unacceptable budgetary deficits over the medium term.
The 2004 Budget addresses the structural deficit inherited from the previous government by putting in place a balanced and responsible approach to deficit reduction over the medium term, while providing funding for necessary programs and services to the public. As part of the government's multi-year fiscal plan, the interim deficit of $6.2 billion in 2003-04 will be reduced to $2.2 billion in 2004-05, $2.1 billion in 2005-06 and $1.5 billion in 2006-07. Ontario's books will be balanced by 2007-08.
With this Budget, the Province will begin to transform Provincial spending on programs and services towards a higher level of fiscal responsibility and transparency, both for financial reporting and planning purposes. This approach is based on the following key principles:
This new approach will help the government create a fiscal plan that is responsible, realistic and sustainable. It will also help to ensure that the people of Ontario better understand fiscal plans and results, while improving upon previous approaches to fiscal planning and management.
In his report, Mr. Peters urged the incoming government to consider legislation that would improve fiscal accountability through greater transparency. In response to Mr. Peters' advice, this government will table the proposed Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act.
This paper also highlights major sensitivities or risks to the fiscal plan that could occur from unexpected changes in economic conditions or program demands. The fiscal plan includes a reserve to provide protection against such risks. Understanding these risks helps the public and decision-makers better understand potential long-term cost pressures and their implications for the fiscal plan.
The last section of this paper discusses upcoming changes in accounting policies that will have an impact on the Provincial "reporting entity"-that is, the organizations included in the fiscal plan and financial reports of the Province-in the future. These changes reflect new guidelines from the Public Sector Accounting Board, which recommends accounting policies for governments in Canada. The impact of these changes in accounting policies will be to include hospitals, school boards and colleges in the Province's financial statements starting with the 2005-06 Public Accounts of Ontario, and in the subsequent Ontario Budget.
In line with the new approach to fiscal planning and reporting, this paper will provide an overview on:
Between 2000-01 and 2003-04, Provincial program spending increased by 22 per cent, far exceeding tax revenues, which declined by 0.6 per cent during this period. This imbalance between Provincial spending and revenue created a fiscal situation that was not sustainable in the long run and resulted in a structural or permanent deficit, unless further action was taken. While the new government immediately took action to provide a stronger revenue base, this alone could not correct the fiscal imbalance. It was clear that the Province could not simply grow its way out of this structural deficit position.
After the surplus recorded in 1989-90, program spending growth significantly exceeded taxation revenue growth in two distinct periods. In both periods, this sizable "gap" between program spending and taxation revenue growth rates signalled the creation of persistent and structural fiscal imbalances.
During the early 1990s, the Province recorded its single largest deficit at $12.4 billion in 1992-93. After nine straight years of deficits, the Province returned to a surplus in 1999-2000. However, starting in 2000-01, program spending growth once again began to outpace taxation revenue growth, gradually creating the conditions for continued future fiscal imbalances that are now observed. Part of this government's plan to eliminate the structural deficit is to gradually bring taxation revenue and program spending growth rates more closely in line, by putting in place a budget process that focuses on results and on reducing long-term cost curves to more affordable and sustainable levels.
The government is committed to delivering measurable improvements in key public services. This Budget represents a first step towards implementing a new approach to planning and budgeting that will significantly improve accountability to the people of Ontario-Budgeting for Results. Governments around the world are developing similar approaches, motivated by the need to know the value-added of any money spent, rather than simply by a need to know how much is spent on a particular program or activity. While amounts of money spent are easy to measure, understanding the meaning of that spending is difficult without additional information. Without such information, it is difficult for the public to hold the government accountable. Budgeting for Results has three main components:
For the provincial government, this year in particular will be a learning process and a period of transition towards Budgeting for Results. Measures that can track progress will be developed and relevant targets for achievement will be set. As the planning and budgeting processes evolve to reflect this new approach, the government will present the Budget in ways that better integrate information on resources, results and risks. This type of reporting will better align the expectations and actions of government and its partners in the broader public sector.
Prior to the development of this Budget, the government engaged the public in an unprecedented consultation process. Through these extensive consultations, important priorities became clearer, as did the approach to developing the results associated with each priority.
Provincial programs must reflect priorities, achieve improved results that can be documented through evidence and, above all, remain affordable. Increased spending alone does not guarantee success for students, healthier Ontarians, prosperity for people, strong communities or a stronger democracy.
Public resources will be focused on achieving clearly defined results associated with these priorities, such as students realizing greater success in literacy and math scores; reduced waiting times leading to healthier Ontarians; higher educational achievement and increased job creation generating prosperity for people; a higher quality of life strengthening the province's communities; and more people actively contributing to their communities, creating a stronger democracy.
Later this year the government will release its first list of results and measures. Budget Paper E, A More Transparent and Accountable Budget, provides more details on Budgeting for Results and outlines the government's vision for reforming the budget process to make it more transparent and accountable.
In October 2003, former Provincial Auditor Erik Peters released a report on the finances of the Province. His report noted that transparency can be more effective in ensuring fiscal accountability than rigid balanced-budget rules. Other governments, international institutions and public-finance academics have also stressed the connection between transparency and responsible fiscal policy.
The government plans to introduce the proposed Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act (FTAA). If passed by the Legislature, the FTAA would create a framework for the conduct of sustainable fiscal policy and strengthen the government's reporting requirements. This proposed legislation would require a pre-election report on the Province's finances. For further details on the proposed provisions, please refer to Budget Paper E, A More Transparent and Accountable Budget.
As a steward of public funds, the government must ensure that the money entrusted to it by its citizens is used in the most effective and efficient way possible. This stewardship role includes ensuring proper fiscal and financial management and continuously reviewing government's activities to ensure their continued relevance to the priorities of government and the key outcomes of importance to the public.
Efficient and trustworthy financial management is a cornerstone of good government. The Modern Controllership initiative led by the Ministry of Finance aims to update key skills in those areas throughout the Ontario Public Service (OPS).
The 2003 Annual Report of the Office of the Provincial Auditor noted the progress made in improving financial management across the OPS, but also concluded that if the government was to fully realize the return on these investments, it would need to take further steps. In response to this advice and input from ministries, the Ministry of Finance is expanding its training programs, increasing its ability to provide expert advice and making seed money available for specific projects that will build ministries' skills and abilities in financial management.
The Government of Ontario owns and manages a wide variety of assets on behalf of the people of Ontario. As part of the continuous review of government activities, the government will undertake a review of major Provincial assets to determine whether they are being managed effectively and efficiently and they are providing the maximum return to the citizens of Ontario. This review will ensure that in all cases the public interest is promoted and protected and that the continued role of the government in owning and managing these assets is consistent with the ongoing priorities of the people of Ontario.
The government will review its assets to determine whether:
Through the consultation process, Ontarians have indicated their desire to retain the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) as a government entity given their satisfaction with the service and the annual revenue generated. Ontarians also expect that organizations such as the LCBO be run as effectively and efficiently as possible so that the revenue from the LCBO is maximized and invested in key priorities such as education and health.
In order to ensure that the people of Ontario continue to obtain the best long-term sustainable results from this valuable public asset, the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, with the support of the Ministry of Finance, will initiate a third-party independent operational review of the LCBO.
The Ministry of Finance will be reviewing the Province's policies and practices related to accounts receivable to ensure that monies owed to the government are collected.
The Ministry of Finance will also improve the efficiency of the government's cash resources, by implementing more standardized cash management practices and through greater use of online banking technologies.
Ontario is determined to be a world leader in tax administration. To achieve this goal, the government will modernize current information systems to deliver state-of-the-art tax administration services. On the service side, the new system will be flexible, efficient and more effective by simplifying, streamlining and integrating processes. Additional service and tax advisory staff will be hired to assist those taxpayers who are making every effort to understand and voluntarily comply with Ontario's tax laws. These service improvements will make it easier than ever to voluntarily comply with Ontario's tax laws.
On the enforcement side, smarter tax processing methods, combined with additional enforcement staff, will improve voluntary compliance by discouraging those taxpayers who base their tax compliance on the perceived risk of being caught. New, more interconnected tax systems will also help the Ministry of Finance to combat the underground economy and those individuals who defy tax laws.
Once implemented, Ontario will have a modern, state-of-the-art tax administration system. Enhanced services will make complying with Ontario's tax laws as easy and convenient as possible, while those who choose not to voluntarily comply will face the full weight of the law. The overall result will be a more level playing field, where everyone pays their fair share.
This government is taking a balanced approach to dealing with the structural deficit-one that recognizes the immediate needs of its public-sector partners and the need to deliver on necessary public services. Trying to force a balanced budget in the short term, through large and indiscriminate spending cuts, would only erode necessary public services. As a result, the government is setting out a clear multi-year fiscal plan to gradually reduce the deficit and eliminate it by 2007-08.
The government's partners in providing vital services to the people of Ontario-hospitals, school boards, universities, colleges and others-need greater financial certainty to plan their activities more rationally. This longer-term plan will allow them to focus on improving the quality of their services while transforming these services to make them sustainable and affordable.
A moderate and sustainable approach to fiscal planning is a priority of this government. To preserve Ontario's economic health, to protect services people value, and to put Ontario on a path of fiscal sustainability and accountability, the government is committing to a medium-term plan to balance the budget. The plan includes steadily declining deficit targets of $2.2 billion in 2004-05, $2.1 billion in 2005-06, $1.5 billion in 2006-07 and a balanced budget by 2007-08. In 2004-05, the deficit target of $2.2 billion includes a one-time revenue gain of $3.9 billion related to the projected elimination of the liability for power purchase agreements with non-utility generators, if the proposed new electricity market structure is passed by the Legislature and is in place.
Over the medium term, the government will be transforming its programs and services to be more accountable, affordable and results based. Through this transformation of government programs and services and by holding program spending growth to less than the rate of growth in tax revenues over the medium term, the government will eliminate Ontario's structural deficit without putting priorities at risk.
This government faces many challenges to ensure that public services are funded on a sustainable basis, both now and in the future. The broader public sector, including management and unionized and non-unionized employees are being asked to be modest in their expectations around compensation increases. The focus of the government is to achieve clearly defined results for the people of Ontario and this will require transformation in the way public services are delivered.
The following table outlines the current medium-term plan and fiscal outlook for the Province, including details of key revenue sources and planned spending for key sectors through to 2007-08.
This medium-term fiscal outlook incorporates the impacts of all revenue and expense measures introduced in the 2004 Budget and reflects the Ontario economic outlook outlined in Budget Paper B, Ontario's Economy.
Plan 2004-05 |
Outlook | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
||
| Revenue | ||||
| Taxation Revenue | ||||
| Personal Income Tax | 18.8 | 19.9 | 21.1 | 22.4 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 15.0 | 15.9 | 16.9 | 17.8 |
| Corporations Tax | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Ontario Health Premium | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| All Other Taxes | 10.2 | 10.9 | 11.2 | 11.5 |
| Total Taxation Revenue | 54.0 | 57.7 | 60.6 | 63.5 |
| Government of Canada | 10.8 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 11.8 |
| Income from Government Enterprises | 3.6 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue * | 10.0 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Total Revenue | 78.4 | 79.9 | 82.5 | 86.0 |
| Expense | ||||
| Programs | ||||
| Health Care | 29.7 | 30.9 | 31.9 | 32.9 |
| Change Fund - Health Care ** | 0.6 | - | - | - |
| Education | 10.6 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Social Services | 9.1 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Justice | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Other Programs | 9.6 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Total Programs | 66.7 | 67.2 | 68.9 | 70.6 |
| Capital | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Interest on Debt | 10.3 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 11.5 |
| Total Expense | 79.6 | 80.5 | 82.5 | 84.5 |
| Reserve | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | (2.2) | (2.1) | (1.5) | 0.0 |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3.9 billion related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
** Expense outlook for 2004-05 includes a one-time Change Fund of $1.0 billion, including $0.6 billion to assist with the transformation of the health care sector.
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Total revenue in 2007-08 is projected at $86.0 billion, an increase of $7.7 billion or 9.8 per cent over the 2004-05 forecast of $78.4 billion. Apart from $3.9 billion in one-time revenues arising in 2004-05 from the projected elimination of the liability associated with agreements for the purchase of power from non-utility generators, the forecasted growth of revenue between 2004-05 and 2007-08 is 15.5 per cent. Total revenue is expected to grow at 1.9 per cent in 2005-06, 3.3 per cent in 2006-07 and 4.3 per cent in 2007-08.
The revenue outlook incorporates the impact of all measures announced in the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2003, and those proposed in this Budget, including the maturation of the Ontario Health Premium and the annualization and growth expected from all other revenue measures. For more information on revenue measures, see Budget Paper C, Ontario's Revenue Plan.
Over the medium term, total expense will rise by $4.9 billion from $79.6 billion this year to $84.5 billion in 2007-08. Total expense growth will average 2.0 per cent annually over this period, down from the 6.9 per cent rate of growth planned for 2004-05, a transition year as the Province moves to results-based fiscal planning and budgeting. Over this time period the projected operating plans of 15 ministries are either declining or are flatlined.
This slowing of Provincial spending growth over the medium term reflects:
In keeping with the government's strategy of a sustainable fiscal policy and the elimination of the structural deficit, program spending will increase at an average annual rate of 1.9 per cent between 2004-05 and 2007-08, well below projected taxation revenue growth, which will average 5.6 per cent annually over this period.
In order to obtain best value for taxpayers' money, the government will intensify an ongoing program review process starting immediately. This will help to ensure that all Provincial programs achieve desired results and outcomes, and that these programs are delivered in an efficient and cost-effective manner. The expense outlook includes a program review savings target of $200 million in 2005-06, $400 million in 2006-07 and $750 million in 2007-08. These program review targets represent less than 0.3 per cent of total expense in 2005-06 and less than one per cent of total expense at maturity in 2007-08.
Reserves of $1.5 billion for 2005-06 and beyond have been included in the medium-term fiscal outlook to protect against unexpected and adverse changes in the economic and fiscal outlook. These reserves have been increased from the $1.0 billion reserve included in the 2004-05 fiscal plan to better reflect the inherent risks and uncertain nature of medium-term fiscal projections. The government will review its policy on reserves in the coming year, to ensure the levels of reserves continue to remain appropriate.
The remainder of this section provides an overview of the medium-term directions and change strategies for key sectors, including health, education, post-secondary education, social services, the electricity sector and municipalities.
Ontario is committed to improving our universal medicare system. The Province will work with health care providers, institutions and federal, municipal and other provincial governments to begin to improve our health care system. The objective is to achieve a health care system that delivers high-quality, results-focused and patient-centred health care to Ontarians where and when it is needed. The performance of the system will be measured based on results, and funding will be targeted to ensure that the results Ontarians want are met, including reduced wait times and access to primary care.
Sustainable health care spending is not about cutting health care spending-that is neither desirable, nor realistic. It is about investing wisely in a system that delivers tangible results in an accountable, efficient and cost-effective manner and that not only focuses on curing illness, but also on health promotion and prevention. Health care costs cannot continue to grow faster than the rate of economic growth over the long term. The Province is devoting an increasing share of its program spending to fund health services. The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care now accounts for 45 per cent of Provincial program spending. There are many pressures on the health care system such as an aging and growing population, rising utilization for existing services, the costly demand for access to new medical technology, wage settlements and emerging public health threats from an increasingly connected world. This rate of increase is not sustainable, and can only lead to the continued "crowding out" of available funding for other priorities in the future.
The health of Ontarians is about more than the amount of funding directed to the health care system through the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. For many years, academics and governments have been gaining a better appreciation of the importance of a broad range of factors that contribute to the health of populations. Adequate housing, proper nutrition, secure employment, educational achievement, and clean air and water-all of these factors and others play vital roles in creating and sustaining health. These have become known as the broader determinants of health and governments play a key role in shaping them, as well as the delivery of health care services.
The concept is easy to understand but has profound implications for government. Continued rapid growth in Provincial spending on health care, without changing health care delivery, will not by itself result in healthier Ontarians and will not create a healthier Ontario. As a society, investments must be balanced across the range of health-creating and sustaining activities. Just as the determinants of health are broader than health care, funding for health must be broader than just health care funding. In this Budget the government is beginning to report on investments that support the goal of healthier Ontarians.
Over the medium term, the government will invest in several key change strategies for the health care sector to keep Ontarians healthy and provide the high quality of services Ontarians expect. The health care system will be driven by the needs of patients and be evaluated based on results, not just the amount of dollars spent.
Ontarians want to be able to receive health care in their communities and want a health care system that will help them stay healthy and will care for them when they are ill. Roy Romanow called home care the next essential service. Services that were previously provided in institutions now can often be delivered at home, offering greater dignity and quality of life and, in many instances, be less costly to provide.
The following health care investments are what Ontario can afford within the existing fiscal plan and will provide for a good start in changing the health care system. When additional funds are available from the federal government, further investments will be made to continue the transformation of the sector and to support key health priorities.
Shorter wait times for key services are needed. As reported by Cancer Care Ontario, some cancer patients are waiting 13 weeks or longer to receive radiation treatment. Ontarians wait an average of 24 days for important cardiac surgeries, the second-longest wait time in Canada. Over the next four years, the government intends to reduce wait times for cancer, cardiac, cataract, MRI/CT and joint-replacement services. Specific results and outcomes to be achieved include:
As a key change strategy for the health care sector, primary care and community-based care will be expanded over the medium term, providing a cost-effective alternative to more expensive institutional care. Specific results and outcomes related to this change strategy include:
While community-based care will increasingly play a key role in the health care system in the future, hospitals will continue to play a significant role. Hospitals have requested multi-year funding. In 2004-05, Ontario's hospitals will receive $11.3 billion in Provincial operating support to ensure that they can continue to provide essential health care services. Over the period from 2003-04 to 2007-08, hospital funding will increase at an average annual rate of 3.4 per cent. By putting more resources into community care and focusing more on prevention, people will be able to leave the hospital sooner, and inappropriate admissions will be avoided. Ontario's hospital system will be able to focus on those with the most acute needs.
Ontario has developed a good model for treating illness, but it has not had an effective strategy for keeping people healthy. The recent Campbell and Walker reports both indicated that major changes are needed in public health. The government intends to move aggressively to give all Ontarians the resources and support they need to achieve good health. Focusing on healthy living, illness prevention and health promotion will, in the long run, be the best way to lower cost curves for health care. Specific results and outcomes to be achieved include:
In the past, the health care system has not made full use of information technology in the delivery of health care services. The government is implementing e-Health initiatives to use information technology to modernize health care service delivery and help achieve health system integration. Projects under the e-Health initiative, to be funded through a $78 million Change Fund investment, include:
Ontario is experiencing a shortage of family doctors that currently affects more than 130 communities, including some of the major cities. Work is also underway to create more full-time jobs for nurses and improve their working conditions. Over the next year, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care will work with the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities to implement a comprehensive health human resource development strategy designed to increase the supply of highly trained health care professionals. Specific results and outcomes to be achieved include:
It has often been difficult to develop and accurately measure outcomes in the health care system. Measures like "quality" are difficult to judge and quantify. Accountability requirements are about initiating a new relationship with health care institutions and providers-a relationship that for the first time ties funding to results, rewards good performance and has consequences for poor performance. Enhanced accountability within the health care system will ensure that scarce dollars are spent more wisely and must:
As an alternative to reducing service quality, the government will be discontinuing payment for selected services not mandated under the Canada Health Act including optometry for ages 20 to 64, chiropractic services and, with the exception of seniors served through home care and long-term care facilities, physiotherapy services.
The Province is undertaking substantial measures to make Ontario's system of primary and secondary education among the best in the world. The Province will work closely with parents, teachers and school boards to attain measurable improvements in student achievement, particularly in literacy and numeracy.
To ensure that sufficient resources are available to support ongoing improvements in student achievements, Ontario will make substantial investments in student success over the next four years as shown in the accompanying graph and table. These investments in student success are both within the Grants for Student Needs (GSN) allocation and outside GSN for targeted programs, primarily for literacy and numeracy.
In the upcoming 2004-05 school year, Grants for Student Needs will increase by over $650 million including Investments in Student Success. Over the next four years, school board funding will rise by $2.1 billion on a school-year basis, and per-student funding will increase by more than 14 per cent to nearly $9,100 in 2007-08, or over $1,100 per student.
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Targeted Funding | 133 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Funding for public education has been limited in recent years, forcing school boards to make difficult choices among competing priorities. In some cases, this has led to insufficient funding for such purposes as maintaining and repairing our schools or for obtaining textbooks and other important learning resources. This environment has contributed to often tense relationships among education partners, and parents have watched as energies were diverted away from the core objective of the education system-supporting student achievement.
In order to focus on improving student results, the Province will follow two closely linked approaches. The first is to stabilize the education system by providing a predictable multi-year funding base. For the upcoming 2004-05 school year, stabilization funding for school boards will increase by more than $400 million. Over the next four school years, this funding will increase by more than eight per cent or $1.3 billion, including a substantial annual fund for school repair and renovation. The Ministry of Education will announce details shortly. This substantial investment will not only ensure that school boards have sufficient funds to meet operating costs, maintain our schools and make available more textbooks and resources, but also provide a platform for improved student achievement.
The second approach is to pursue excellence in education and student success. Province-wide test results for 2002-03 indicate that among Grade 6 students, 56 per cent or fewer met Provincial standards for reading, writing and math. Over the next four years, the government will implement a number of strategies to improve student results in reading, writing and math by age 12. The Province aims to achieve the following results by the 2007-08 school year.
To support the achievement of these results, the Province will make Investments in Student Success by enhancing Grants for Student Needs (GSN) to school boards by over $450 million in the 2004-05 school year, growing to over $1 billion by the 2007-08 school year. These funds will be earmarked to implement the cap on class size from junior kindergarten to Grade 3 and to provide additional supports to students who need help the most.
In addition, other student success funding outside GSN will provide $133 million in the 2004-05 fiscal year, annualizing to $250 million in 2005-06, primarily for targeted literacy and numeracy programs. Over the next four years, these funds will be used to:
The Ministry of Education will work with school boards and schools to develop results targets and to monitor achievement. These performance indicators, to be developed with education partners, will be published annually.
It is not sufficient, however, to limit attention only to the primary grades. The system must provide the right supports to enable every student to reach his or her highest possible level of achievement. A recent study suggests that up to 25 per cent of Grade 9 students may leave school without graduating. The 2001 Census indicates that nearly 190,000 (13 per cent) of Ontario's 20- to 29-year-old population had not completed a high school diploma.
The Ministry of Education will work with the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities to develop a comprehensive "learning to 18" strategy to increase the number of students staying in school, completing their secondary school studies and going on to training or post-secondary education. To support the development of this strategy, the Province will:
An adequate supply of well-trained teachers is crucial to support the education transformation plan. Therefore, the Province will enhance the number of teacher-training spaces by 1,000 in 2004-05 and 2005-06. This enhancement would augment the 5,700 teachers currently being trained each year and require an additional investment of $15 million over two years.
Over the coming weeks, the Ministry of Education will be announcing further details on education funding and on strategies to improve student achievement.
In today's knowledge-based economy, quality education and training programs are needed to help Ontarians reach their full potential. A well-educated and trained workforce provides the economy with a clear competitive advantage.
Colleges and universities play a crucial role in providing the knowledge and skills for Ontarians to succeed. The Province will ensure that Ontario's colleges and universities remain a quality system that ensures access and affordability.
To support post-secondary education and apprenticeship and training programs, the operating spending of the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities will increase by $260 million to $4.2 billion in 2004-05. By 2007-08, the Ministry's funding will increase by $470 million, or 12 per cent, compared to 2003-04.
Ontario will work with students, parents and institutions to transform the post-secondary education sector in order to create an accessible, affordable, accountable and quality system. The Province's aim is to increase attendance at post-secondary education institutions and to design a more co-ordinated system with increased specialization and reduced duplication. This will allow students to maximize their learning objectives.
To transform the post-secondary education system, the Province will take the following steps:
Ontario is facing a shortage of professional health care workers. Over the next year, the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities will work with the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to implement a comprehensive health human resource development strategy designed to increase the supply of highly trained health care professionals.
The Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities will also work with the Ministry of Education to ensure an adequate supply of appropriately trained teachers.
Ontario needs to increase the quality and quantity of skilled labour, including tradespeople. The Province will transform the training and apprenticeship system by creating a One-Stop Training and Employment system to better serve apprentices, immigrants, unemployed individuals and youth in transition from school to work. The One-Stop system will streamline and improve access to programs and responsiveness to employers. As part of this strategy, the Province will negotiate a second-generation labour market agreement with the federal government to allow the integration of federal and provincial labour market and training programs. These transformations will improve pathways to training and employment and produce the following results:
The Province will provide new funding of $11.7 million annually by 2006-07 to expand apprenticeship and will propose a new Apprenticeship Training Tax Credit to encourage employers to hire more apprentices.
The Province will take action to remove the barriers faced by internationally trained individuals that prevent them from pursuing their profession or trade. The Province will provide $12.5 million annually by 2005-06 for this strategy, which will include:
Strong communities are a key priority for the Province. To support this priority, the government will move to revitalize the social services sector and provide effective and co-ordinated supports for Ontario's children, families and vulnerable people.
Funding for the social services sector, which includes the Ministries of Children and Youth Services and Community and Social Services, will increase by over $1 billion by 2007-08 from the 2003-04 level.
Programs for children and youth are fragmented and scattered among different Provincial ministries and a wide range of services and supports. Some agencies serving children have been constrained in recent years to the point that services have eroded and service wait times have increased. This complex and inefficient system is difficult for families to navigate through and can often result in poor outcomes as children and youth "fall through the cracks" in the system.
In order to transform children's services, the Province has established the Ministry of Children and Youth Services. Programs for children, formerly dispersed among different ministries, are being consolidated in the new ministry and form the nucleus from which a seamless and rational system of services for children and youth will be built. The aim of this transformation is to ensure that all children and youth have the best opportunity to succeed and realize their full potential.
Over the medium term, the Province will implement strategies to promote strong communities by ensuring that children arrive at school ready to learn and that children are provided the supports they require. First steps in this transition, and key results arising from this strategy, include the following:
Services and supports for families and adults have also been constrained in recent years, which has contributed to an increase in homelessness and poverty. Over the next four years, the Province will improve community supports in order to achieve the following results:
As a first step in this transition, the Province is moving to improve income support programs through the following measures:
In total, these measures will provide an additional $106 million in benefits annually to social assistance recipients. Municipalities will not be required to share the cost of these increases until 2005.
Also, social assistance benefits will not be reduced by the July 2004 increase to the federal National Child Benefit Supplement (NCBS) for one year. This change will provide social assistance recipients with an extra $7 million for the 2004-05 fiscal year.
Over the next year, the Province will examine Ontario's approach to the treatment of NCBS payments to social assistance recipients and decide whether it should be changed or restructured. As well, social assistance programs that provide cash and in-kind benefits for children will be reviewed. If there are better ways to deliver benefits to low-income families and vulnerable children, the government will do so.
In addition to financial assistance, people may also need supports provided by social service agencies. As is the case for children's programs, services for adults are sometimes fragmented and some agencies serving adults have experienced financial constraints that have reduced their ability to deliver effective services. The Province will transform this sector by ensuring that social services operate on a sound financial base and efficiently support their clients to achieve positive results. As part of this change strategy, the Province is taking the following actions:
The Province will be transforming services for people with developmental disabilities in order to create an accessible, fair and sustainable system of community-based supports. The Province will work with stakeholders to create a plan that will result in more self-reliant individuals and families supported by co-ordinated information, planning and services in their local communities.
The government will introduce legislation that would amend the Tenant Protection Act. The current rent control guideline allows landlords uncontested rent increases of two per cent plus an inflation factor. Under the proposed 2005 guideline, the two per cent base amount would be suspended so that rent increases would reflect only the increases in landlords' operating costs.
The government will work with the federal government to increase the number of affordable housing units in Ontario, with a particular focus on appropriate housing for persons suffering from mental illness, victims of domestic violence and the working poor.
A secure, stable, efficient and clean electricity system is a cornerstone of a strong, competitive and innovative economy and is fundamental to our quality of life. The electricity sector directly employs more than 40,000 people, and generates sales of about $12 billion.
The Province is the sole shareholder of both Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG), which acquired the generating assets of the former Ontario Hydro in 1999; and of Hydro One Inc., which acquired the transmission and distribution assets of the old Ontario Hydro.
The fiscal impact of the performance of the electricity sector since April 1, 1999 reflects the net consolidation of the results of OPG, Hydro One, the Independent Electricity Market Operator (IMO), and Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) into the Province's books. OEFC is the legal continuation of the old Ontario Hydro and has the mandate to manage and retire the debt and certain other liabilities of the old Ontario Hydro. A sustainable electricity system means consumers must pay the true cost of electricity. In the past five years, this has not been the case. Without a significant restructuring of the electricity sector, the taxpayer would be at greater risk of continuing to subsidize electricity prices.
The government plans to introduce legislation in June 2004 to implement its vision for reforming the electricity sector, and if the legislation is passed in the fall, the new market structure is expected to be in place early in the new year.
In addition to the creation of an Ontario Power Authority, responsible for ensuring long-term supply adequacy in Ontario and encouraging conservation and renewable energy, the proposed reforms would result in a combination of a fully regulated and competitive electricity sector, with different electricity generators receiving prices set through a variety of mechanisms. Electricity generated from OPG's nuclear and baseload hydro generation assets would receive regulated prices, and electricity from those generators with existing or new contracts would receive prices as determined by their contracts. A competitive market would set the price received by other generation.
Under the proposed plan, consumers would pay bills that reflect a blend of these costs, including the pass-through of regulated rates for OPG-regulated plants, the full costs for existing and new contracts for generation, and market prices for other plants receiving the market price. For residential and small business consumers, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) would implement a new standard rate plan in early 2005 that would reflect these blended costs. The standard rate plan would provide more stable prices to consumers, with periodic adjustments to ensure people pay the true cost of electricity over time.
The 2004-05 and medium-term fiscal outlook are based on the implementation of the government's proposed reforms of the electricity sector, as well as other actions already taken. The main impacts, through consolidation of OPG and OEFC on the Province's books, would be as follows:
The intent of these proposed changes is to have consumers pay the true cost of electricity, without taxpayers paying part of the cost. The projected impact on the fiscal plan would be that sufficient revenues are received from the electricity sector to pay for the interest on the Province's investment in OPG and Hydro One and to ensure that the debt and other liabilities of the old Ontario Hydro are serviced and retired by the electricity consumer, not the taxpayer.
The Ontario Government and Ontario's municipal leaders share the responsibility of ensuring safe and vital communities. The Ontario Government will begin a dialogue with municipal leaders in the summer of 2004 that will result in a new partnership between the provincial government and municipalities, including new governance and financial tools. This dialogue is expected to guide provincial and municipal fiscal arrangements over the next four years and into the future.
The government will dedicate two cents of the existing provincial gas tax to municipalities for public transit, beginning with one cent in October 2004. This funding will be increased to 1.5 cents in October 2005, and two cents in October 2006. A distribution formula for this funding will be a subject for consultation in the upcoming dialogue.
The Province will move to assume 75 per cent of the cost of public health by 2007. This will have a positive impact on municipal budgets throughout Ontario, with a large portion of the benefit accruing to Greater Toronto Area (GTA) municipalities. In light of this, the government intends to enter into discussions with GTA municipalities on mechanisms to share the costs of transit and transportation in recognition of the increasingly integrated reliance of GTA residents on their transportation infrastructure.
The Province and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) have a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that has established a framework for consultation and partnership. The Province will introduce legislation to enshrine this MOU in the Municipal Act. The Province will also work with the AMO to undertake a review of the Municipal Act to ensure that municipal leaders have the powers and flexibility needed to effectively serve their communities.
The Ontario Government has asked the federal government to establish a federal, provincial and municipal working group to examine options to make municipalities more fiscally sustainable, autonomous and accountable, and to ensure that municipalities have a seat at the table of national change.
In addition to the cornerstone initiatives noted previously, the Ontario Government is undertaking a wide range of investments and initiatives to support Ontario's municipalities and work in partnership on shared challenges:
In 2004-05, the deficit is forecast at $2.2 billion, a $4.0 billion reduction from the $6.2 billion deficit projected for 2003-04. The 2004-05 fiscal plan includes the impact of a one-time $3.9 billion revenue gain related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements.
| Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Millions | Per cent | |||
| Revenue * | 68,250 | 78,360 | 10,110 | 14.8 |
| Expense | ||||
| Programs | 62,518 | 66,695 | 4,177 | 6.7 |
| Capital | 2,202 | 2,575 | 373 | 16.9 |
| Interest on Debt | 9,752 | 10,329 | 577 | 5.9 |
| Total Expense | 74,472 | 79,599 | 5,127 | 6.9 |
| Reserve | - | 1,000 | 1,000 | - |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | (6,222) | (2,239) | 3,983 | (64.0) |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3,881 million related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Revenue is projected at $78.4 billion in 2004-05, up $10.1 billion or 14.8 per cent from the 2003-04 interim level. Of this increase, $3.9 billion arises from the projected elimination of the liability associated with non-utility generator power purchase agreements. The $4.8 billion increase in taxation revenues is attributable to a growing economy and the revenue impact of measures in the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2003, and proposed in this Budget, including the new Ontario Health Premium.
| Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Millions | Per cent | |||
| Taxation Revenue | ||||
| Personal Income Tax | 17,778 | 18,821 | 1,043 | 5.9 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 14,260 | 15,036 | 776 | 5.4 |
| Corporations Tax | 7,222 | 8,320 | 1,098 | 15.2 |
| Ontario Health Premium | - | 1,635 | 1,635 | - |
| All Other Taxes | 9,901 | 10,186 | 285 | 2.9 |
| Total Taxation Revenue | 49,161 | 53,998 | 4,837 | 9.8 |
| Government of Canada | 9,962 | 10,798 | 836 | 8.4 |
| Income from Government Enterprises | 3,069 | 3,564 | 495 | 16.1 |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue * | 6,058 | 10,000 | 3,942 | 65.1 |
| Total Revenue | 68,250 | 78,360 | 10,110 | 14.8 |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3,881 million related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
The 2004-05 expense outlook at $79.6 billion is up $5.1 billion from the 2003-04 interim outlook of $74.5 billion. Increased spending is concentrated on health care, education, post-secondary education and social services. A total of $1.0 billion is being provided through the Change Fund to facilitate the implementation of change strategies in key sectors.
| Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Millions | Per cent | |||
| Programs | ||||
| Health Care | 28,100 | 29,652 | 1,552 | 5.5 |
| Change Fund - Health Care * | - | 609 | 609 | - |
| SARS-related and Major One-Time Health Costs | 842 | - | (842) | - |
| Education | 9,754 | 10,623 | 869 | 8.9 |
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 3,934 | 4,194 | 260 | 6.6 |
| Social Services | 8,659 | 9,149 | 490 | 5.7 |
| Justice | 2,826 | 2,907 | 81 | 2.9 |
| Other Programs ** | 8,403 | 9,561 | 1,158 | 13.8 |
| Total Programs | 62,518 | 66,695 | 4,177 | 6.7 |
| Capital | 2,202 | 2,575 | 373 | 16.9 |
| Interest on Debt | 9,752 | 10,329 | 577 | 5.9 |
| Total Expense | 74,472 | 79,599 | 5,127 | 6.9 |
* Expense outlook for 2004-05 includes a one-time Change Fund of $1.0 billion, including $0.6 billion to assist with the transformation of the health care sector.
** Includes $1.0 billion Contingency Fund and $0.4 billion Change Fund in 2004-05 expense outlook.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
The 2004 Budget includes a one-time $1.0 billion Change Fund that will support the government's plans to change and improve Ontario's public services. The Fund will help to pay for projects that rationalize or better integrate existing programs and services, to put in place new systems and processes to reduce long-term costs, or to mitigate the demand for services over the long run.
Change Fund investments are intended to cover one-time costs in 2004-05 only; any additional support, if required, will be determined as part of the 2005-06 Budgeting for Results process. Of the $1.0 billion allocated for the Change Fund, more than $600 million is to be provided to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to assist with its transformation agenda. The remaining funding has been, or will be, distributed to other ministries that can provide an acceptable business case for their proposed projects.
The following table highlights key investments funded through the Change Fund in 2004-05.
| Plan 2004-05 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Investments for Health Care | ||
| Community Health Services-home care and community mental health | 140 | |
| Family Health Teams | 111 | |
| e-Health Initiatives | 78 | |
| Other Projects (including wait lists and workplace safety) | 280 | |
| 609 | ||
| Other Investments | ||
| ServiceOntario Enhancement | 27 | |
| College Stabilization | 25 | |
| Nutrient Management Financial Assistance Program | 5 | |
| All Other | 6 | |
| 63 | ||
| Investments to be Confirmed | 328 | |
| Total Change Fund Investments | 1,000 |
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
The remaining $328 million in the Change Fund will be allocated early this fiscal year, following a review of business case plans to ensure projects demonstrate such benefits as good value for money; improved quality or delivery of public services; improved cost efficiency or result in cost savings in the long run. As Change Fund projects are reviewed and approved during the fiscal year, these will be detailed and reported in the quarterly Ontario Finances.
Any unallocated amounts remaining in the Change Fund at year-end will be applied to reduce the deficit.
The government is committed to ensuring a health care system that is sustainable and delivers high- quality, results-focused and patient-centred health care to Ontarians where and when it is needed. Programs and services that support healthier Ontarians are delivered through many ministries including Health and Long-Term Care; Children and Youth Services; Environment; Training, Colleges and Universities; and others. Altogether, the government will increase spending for programs contributing to healthier Ontarians by $2.4 billion in 2004-05. The table below illustrates increases in programs that contribute to healthier Ontarians.
| Increase 2004-05 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care | ||
|
406 | |
|
272 | |
|
193 | |
|
182 | |
|
165 | |
|
108 | |
|
97 | |
|
470 | |
|
268 | |
| 2,161 | ||
| Ministry of Children and Youth Services | ||
|
25 | |
| Ministry of Community and Social Services | ||
|
42 | |
| Ministry of Environment | ||
|
52 | |
|
8 | |
| 60 | ||
| Ministries of Municipal Affairs and Housing/Northern Development and Mines | ||
|
21 | |
| Ministry of Natural Resources | ||
|
26 | |
|
6 | |
| 32 | ||
| Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities | ||
|
16 | |
| Ministry of Tourism and Recreation | ||
|
3 | |
| Total Increase in Funding | 2,360 |
Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal.
To ensure that there will be funding, both for health care and for other health enhancing priorities, the government will introduce proposed legislation to create the Ontario Health Premium to support a $2.4 billion increase in funding for the programs that contribute to healthier Ontarians this year.
Provincial proceeds from gaming activities continue to support Provincial priorities, including the operation of hospitals, charities, communities and the agricultural sector.
| Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Lotteries, Charity Casinos and Slot Machines at Racetracks Revenue | ||
| Operation of Hospitals | 1,499 | 1,474 |
| Ontario Trillium Foundation | 100 | 95 |
| Problem Gambling and Related Programs | 21 | 36 |
| Commercial Casinos Revenue | ||
| General Government Priorities | 480 | 512 |
| Total | 2,100 | 2,117 |
Sources: Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Trade and Ontario Ministry of Finance.
The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation Act, 1999, requires that net Provincial revenue generated from lotteries, charity casinos and racetrack slot machines support services such as the operation of hospitals, problem gambling and related programs, and funding for charitable organizations through the Ontario Trillium Foundation.
| Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural Sector | 308 | 299 |
| Municipalities | 75 | 75 |
| Total | 383 | 374 |
Source: Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.
Infrastructure is the foundation, literally and figuratively, for the next wave of economic and population growth in Ontario.
Investment in infrastructure raises our standard of living through its impact on productivity and by enabling the provision of public services that improve our quality of life. Every additional $1 million invested in public infrastructure generates approximately $200,000 in annual cost savings to Ontario businesses. Similarly, in the public sector, investment in infrastructure can raise the quality and efficiency of health, education and other public services.
Ontario already has public infrastructure worth more than $250 billion. However, over the last two decades, public infrastructure growth has significantly lagged economic growth. At the same time, most of the infrastructure built for the baby boom is reaching the end of its useful life and needs to be renewed or replaced.
To help meet the infrastructure challenge, the government established a new Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal. The Ministry is responsible for the strategic management of the government's capital investment plan, including investments in the Province's own assets and transfers for capital purposes to hospitals, municipalities, post-secondary institutions and other transfer recipients.
The government is also committing to develop a 10-year strategic infrastructure investment plan to guide our future investment decisions. The plan will identify long-term investment priorities in key sectors such as water and wastewater, transportation, health, justice, schools and post-secondary education.
The way we live tomorrow depends on how we plan and grow today. That is why the government is developing a growth management plan, starting with the Golden Horseshoe-the largest urban region in Canada. The plan will help us grow in the right way-by investing in infrastructure to support growth areas and by protecting the areas that provide our food, water and recreation. The government will be releasing the first growth management plan for the Golden Horseshoe region in the coming months.
| Plan 2004-05 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Transportation | 1,546 | |
| Highways | 992 | |
| Transit | 448 | |
| Other Transportation | 106 | |
| Health and Long-Term Care | 346 | |
| Post-Secondary Education | 175 | |
| Environment | 346 | |
| Water | 257 | |
| Other | 89 | |
| Municipal and Local Infrastructure | 505 | |
| Justice | 97 | |
| Other (Net) | 328 | |
| Total Gross Capital Investment | 3,343 | |
| Less: Net Investment in Capital Assets * | 768 | |
| Total Capital Expense | 2,575 |
* Table A5 in the appendix of this Paper includes the details pertaining to Net Investment in Capital Assets.
Note: Total gross capital investment includes $359 million in flow-through funds (Infrastructure revenue on a PSAB basis is $267 million): $89 million for Transportation, $103 million for Environment, and $167 million for Municipal and Local Infrastructure. Gross capital investment excluding flow-through funds is $3.0 billion.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal.
In 2004-05, the government will invest approximately $3.3 billion in Ontario's infrastructure.
The government is creating the Ontario Strategic Infrastructure Financing Authority (OSIFA) as an innovative financing vehicle that can be used by the broader public sector to renew and build critical public infrastructure assets. This vehicle also provides the federal government with an opportunity to partner with Ontario.
Renewing Ontario's public infrastructure improves the quality of public services and helps build a strong and prosperous economy.
OSIFA will develop and implement an infrastructure renewal loan program that provides efficient and affordable financing to meet critical municipal, health, education and housing infrastructure priorities. OSIFA is based on a proven "pooled financing" concept that aggregates the infrastructure investment needs of many borrowers into one borrowing pool. OSIFA will provide access to infrastructure capital that would not otherwise be available to smaller borrowers. Larger borrowers will benefit from significant savings on transaction costs such as legal costs and underwriting commissions. Under the OSIFA approach, all borrowers will receive the same low interest rate.
OSIFA's 2004-05 infrastructure renewal loan program will be focused on Ontario's municipalities, aiming to offer affordable infrastructure financing for five key municipal priorities: clean water infrastructure, sewage treatment facilities, waste management infrastructure, municipal roads and bridges, and public transit.
The government wants to ensure that borrowers eligible for OSIFA's loan program represent the full scope of needs within the broader public sector. Therefore, along with Ontario municipalities, the OSIFA infrastructure renewal loan program will include hospitals, municipal long-term care facilities, colleges, universities, school boards and affordable housing providers.
In the coming months the Ministries of Finance and Public Infrastructure Renewal will consult with representatives from line ministries and key stakeholders to design the program parameters for broader public-sector borrowers. These parameters for the OSIFA infrastructure renewal loan program will be announced later this year.
OSIFA will offer a new financial instrument called Infrastructure Renewal Bonds (IRBs) to institutional and individual investors. OSIFA will use the proceeds from the sale of IRBs to fund its infrastructure renewal loan program.
IRBs will be attractive to large institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies. They will offer an investment that is backed by the credit strength of municipal, hospital, educational and other public-sector borrowers. These bonds will provide local investors with a solid investment for their families and an opportunity to invest in local infrastructure. The first issue of IRBs will take place later this year.
The interim outlook for 2003-04 forecasts a deficit of $6,222 million, up $601 million from the $5,621 million deficit reported in the 2003 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review ("Fall Outlook"). This deterioration is mainly due to in-year revenue declines of $1,282 million from lower tax revenues and the writedown of Ontario Power Generation coal-fired plants, partially offset by lower interest on debt charges and year-end underspending.
| Fall Outlook * |
Interim | In-Year Change |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 69,532 | 68,250 | (1,282) |
| Expense | |||
| Programs | 62,554 | 62,518 | (36) |
| Capital | 2,574 | 2,202 | (372) |
| Interest on Debt | 10,025 | 9,752 | (273) |
| Total Expense | 75,153 | 74,472 | (681) |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | (5,621) | (6,222) | (601) |
* As presented in the 2003 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Total revenues in 2003-04 are estimated to be $68,250 million, $1,282 million below the Fall Outlook projection.
| Interim 2003-04 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Taxation Revenue | ||
| Personal Income Tax | (822) | |
| Retail Sales Tax | (290) | |
| All Other Taxes | 326 | |
| (786) | ||
| Government of Canada | ||
| Infrastructure-related Federal Payments | (251) | |
| Other Federal Payments | (51) | |
| (302) | ||
| Income from Government Enterprises | ||
| Hydro Successor Corporations | (333) | |
| Other Government Enterprises | (32) | |
| (365) | ||
| Other Revenue | 171 | |
| Total In-Year Revenue Changes | (1,282) |
Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance.
Total expense for 2003-04 is $681 million below the level of $75,153 million projected in the 2003 Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review.
| Interim 2003-04 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Expense Changes: | ||
| Hospitals-additional operating costs | 310 | |
| Partially offset from the Contingency Fund | (215) | |
| OHIP Utilization and Primary Care Information Technology | 208 | |
| Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund-Algoma Retiree Pension Plans | 162 | |
| Fully offset from the Contingency Fund | (162) | |
| Power Purchases-lower volumes of electricity required | (119) | |
| Teachers Pension Plan-lower benefit costs and better-than-expected return on pension plan assets | (105) | |
| Other (Net) | (115) | |
| Total Program Expense Changes | (36) | |
| Capital Expense Changes: | ||
| Municipal Partnership Initiatives-delay in concluding agreements | (179) | |
| Health programs-construction delays | (149) | |
| Justice programs-project completion delays | (14) | |
| Other (Net) | (30) | |
| Total Capital Expense Changes | (372) | |
| Interest on Debt Change | (273) | |
| Total In-Year Expense Changes | (681) |
Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal.
This section highlights some of the key sensitivities and risks to the fiscal plan that could follow from unexpected changes in economic conditions or program demand. It should be cautioned that these sensitivities and risks are only useful guidelines and can vary depending on the nature and composition of potential risk.
A growing economy with rising incomes and consumer spending generates higher revenues to pay for public services. Taxation revenues comprise the largest category of revenue for the Provincial government. Of the $78 billion forecast as Provincial revenue for 2004-05, $54 billion or about 69 per cent is expected to come from taxation revenue. Three revenue sources within this category- Personal Income Tax, Retail Sales Tax and Corporations Tax-account for 54 per cent of total revenue. Inherent in any multi-year revenue forecast is uncertainty about the future.
| Item/Key Components | 2004-05 Assumption | Sensitivities |
|---|---|---|
| Total Taxation Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base 1 | 3.5 per cent growth | $500 million change in revenues per percentage point change in nominal GDP growth. Can vary significantly depending on composition and source of changes in GDP growth. |
| - Real GDP | 2.3 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| - Nominal GDP | 4.1 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| - GDP Deflator | 1.7 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Personal Income Tax Revenues | ||
| Tax Assessments | ||
| - Revenue Base | 2.8 per cent growth in 2003 3.4 per cent growth in 2004-05 |
$180 million change in 2004-05 revenues for each percentage point change in 2003 PIT. 2 |
| Key Economic Assumptions | ||
| - Employment | 1.7 per cent growth in 2004 | $220 million change in 2004-05 revenues for each percentage point change in wages and salaries growth. |
| - Wages and Salaries | 3.1 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| - Unincorporated Business Income | 5.9 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Key Revenue Assumptions | ||
| - Net Capital Gains Income | 4.4 per cent growth in 2004 | $5 million change in revenue per one percentage point change in net capital gains income. $10 million change in revenue per one percentage point change in RRSP deductions. |
| - RRSP Deductions | 4.9 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Retail Sales Tax Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 4.6 per cent growth | $90 million change in revenue per percentage point change in nominal consumption expenditure growth. |
| Includes: | ||
| - Taxable Consumer Spending | 3.8 per cent growth | |
| - Other Taxable Spending | 5.7 per cent growth | |
| Key Economic Assumptions | ||
| - Retail Sales | 3.5 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| - Nominal Consumption Expenditure | 4.0 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Corporations Tax Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 3.5 per cent growth | $45 million change in revenue per percentage point change in pre-tax corporate profit growth. $12 million change in revenue per one percentage point change in 2003-04 refunds. |
| - Corporate Profits | 5.8 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| - 2003-04 tax assessment refunds 3 | $1.2 billion payable | |
| Employer Health Tax Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 3.0 per cent growth | $30 million change in revenue per percentage point change in wages and salaries growth. |
| - Wages and Salaries | 3.1 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Ontario Health Premium Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 4.3 per cent growth | $20 million change in revenue per percentage point change in personal income growth. |
| - Personal Income | 3.4 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Gasoline Tax Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 2.0 per cent growth | $8 million change in revenue per one cent per litre change in prices. |
| - Gasoline pump prices | 72 cents per litre | |
| Fuel Tax Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 5.8 per cent growth | $10 million change in revenue per percentage point change in real GDP growth. |
| - Real GDP | 2.3 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Land Transfer Tax Revenues | ||
| - Revenue Base | 3.9 per cent growth | $10 million change in revenue per percentage point change in both the number and prices of housing resales. |
| - Housing Resales | 3.6 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| - Resale Prices | 5.5 per cent growth in 2004 | |
| Health and Social Transfers | ||
| - Canada-wide Revenue Base | $20.6 billion | $30 million change in revenue per one-tenth percentage point change in population share. $10 million change in revenue per one-tenth percentage point change in PIT base share. |
| - Ontario Population Share | 38.8 per cent | |
| - Ontario PIT Base Share | 44.0 per cent | |
| - Ontario Revenue Share | 37.0 per cent |
1 Revenue base is revenues excluding the impact of measures, adjustments for past Public Accounts estimate variances and other one-time factors.
2 Ontario 2003 PIT is currently a forecast estimate because 2003 tax returns are currently being assessed by Canada Revenue Agency.
3 Corporations Tax refunds arising during 2003-04 are still subject to considerable uncertainty because a very high proportion of corporations have until June 30, 2004 to file their 2003 tax return.
Many programs delivered by the Province are subject to potential risks and cost drivers such as utilization growth or enrolment and caseload changes. The following sensitivities are based on averages for program areas and might change depending on the nature and composition of the potential risk.
| Program | 2004-05 Assumption | Sensitivities |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitals | Annual growth of 4.3 per cent | One per cent change in hospital funding: $113 million. |
| Drug Programs | Annual growth of 8.3 per cent (in health portion) | One per cent change in utilization of all drug programs: $25 million. |
| Home Care/Community Services | Over 15.6 million hours of homemaking and support services 7.9 million nursing and professional visits | One per cent change in hours of homemaking and support services: $4 million. One per cent change in nursing and professional visits: $5 million. |
| Long-Term Care Facilities | Approximately 74,400 long-term care facility beds | Annual average Provincial operating cost per bed, after resident co-payment revenue, in a long-term care facility is over $33,000. One per cent change in number of beds: $25 million. |
| Elementary and Secondary Schools | Almost 2 million average daily pupil enrolment | One per cent enrolment change: $160 million. |
| College Students | 151,000 full-time students | One per cent enrolment change: $6 million. |
| University Students | 295,000 full-time students | One per cent enrolment change: $20 million. |
| Ontario Works | 196,000 average annual caseload | One per cent caseload change: $15 million. |
| Ontario Disability Support Program | 225,000 average annual caseload | One per cent caseload change: $22 million. |
| Judicial System | 2.8 million adult inmate days per year | Average cost $150 per inmate per day. One per cent change in inmate days: $4 million. |
| Interest on debt | Average cost of borrowing is expected to be approximately 4.9 per cent. | The impact of a 100 basis-point change in borrowing rates is expected to be approximately $150 million. |
Compensation costs and wage settlements are key cost drivers and have a substantial impact on both the finances of broader public sector partners and the Province.
| Sector | Cost of 1% salary increase | Size of Sector |
|---|---|---|
| OHIP Payments to Physicians | $58 million * | Over 21,000 physicians in Ontario, comprising 10,000 family doctors and 11,000 specialists. |
| Hospital Nurses | $34 million * | Over 40,000 nurses in hospitals. |
| Elementary and Secondary School Staff | $115 million ** | Over 180,000 staff including teachers, principals, administrators, support and maintenance staff. |
| Ontario Public Service | $45 million * | Over 60,000 public servants. |
* Based on 2003-04.
** One per cent increase to salary benchmarks in Grants for Student Needs based on 2003-04 school year.
In August 2003, the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), which recommends accounting standards for governments in Canada, set out new standards for a government's reporting entity. The reporting entity consists of all organizations included in the government's financial statements.
Under the new standards, the Province will add to its books 105 school boards and school authorities, 24 community colleges and 154 hospitals from across Ontario. They will be consolidated into the Province's financial statements starting with the 2005-06 Public Accounts of Ontario, and in the subsequent Ontario Budget.
The change will have an impact on the Province's financial plans and reports. With the inclusion of these organizations:
The Ministry of Finance will work closely with the affected line ministries and their transfer partners in developing the process and protocol for meeting the new PSAB requirements.
Under the new standards, the inclusion of an organization in the reporting entity depends on whether the government controls the organization. Control is a complex issue tied to governance and legal powers. To help with decision-making, the new PSAB standards provide in-depth guidance by setting out numerous "indicators of control."
The Office of the Provincial Auditor, in its 2003 Annual Report, looked in detail at how the new standards might affect Ontario. The report concluded that the Province should carry out an assessment of colleges, school boards and hospitals, all of which met significant markers of control. The Province's assessment concluded that it was appropriate to include school boards and school authorities (small school boards located in remote areas), hospitals and colleges in the reporting entity.
Other organizations in the broader public sector may also meet the new standards. The Province will work with the Office of the Provincial Auditor to assess which organizations should be included in its financial statements in the future, and when.
The financial results of all organizations in the reporting entity must be consolidated into one set of figures for the Budget or financial statements.
PSAB has recommended that the organizations initially be consolidated on a "one-line" basis. Under this treatment, the total net assets of included organizations are shown as a single line in the Province's assets. Similarly, their annual surplus/deficit is shown in total as a single-line item on the Province's Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Under the one-line consolidation method, organizations can be included on the accounting basis they view as the most appropriate for their organization, whether or not that basis is the same as the Province's. To illustrate, colleges and hospitals now use generally accepted accounting standards appropriate for not-for-profit organizations. With the assistance of the Province, school boards are adopting generally accepted accounting standards appropriate for local government organizations. Neither of these treatments, however, corresponds directly to PSAB standards used by Ontario and other provincial governments. For example, PSAB for local government organizations does not currently treat investment in tangible capital assets the way that provincial government standards do.
PSAB has proposed that governments, including Ontario, ultimately move to what is called full consolidation of organizations that meet the test of control under the new standards. Under this treatment, the organizations would have to adopt the same accounting policies as the Province, and each item of their revenue and spending, and their assets and liabilities, would be combined with the same item in the Province's financial statements.
Ontario has serious concerns about fully consolidating these organizations. In the view of the Province, one-line consolidation is a better treatment. It meets the Province's need to reflect the overall financial impact of these organizations and to exercise high-level control. At the same time, it shows more clearly that organizations such as hospitals, school boards and colleges operate with a greater degree of autonomy-through their boards, their ability to raise funds or revenues, and their latitude in allocating their resources-than organizations directly controlled by the Province that are fully consolidated.
Ontario has already expressed these concerns to PSAB, and will work with PSAB and the Office of the Provincial Auditor to resolve them.
In line with its commitment to best practices in fiscal planning and reporting, Ontario recognizes that one-line consolidation of certain organizations supports important goals:
At present, about 80 per cent of the Province's program and capital spending is in the form of transfer payments to individuals and organizations such as hospitals, schools, long-term care facilities and colleges. However, the only information available on the Province's books for these organizations, at present is the funds transferred each year. One-line consolidation will also reflect whether these organizations are running surpluses or deficits.
The Province will further enhance the transparency by providing segmented information on the major categories of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, by sector, in the notes to its financial statements.
Greater transparency goes hand-in-hand with the need for greater accountability. For example, if a newly added organization overspends and runs a deficit, the Province's deficit will increase accordingly. This is a reminder that the organizations and the Province have a responsibility to taxpayers as well as those who use public services.
The Province records investments in its own long-lived assets, such as highways, as investment in capital assets rather than current-year expense. However, funds for capital purposes that are transferred to organizations outside the reporting entity are treated as current-year expense in the Province's books. In the case of hospitals and colleges, consolidation will remove this inconsistency in accounting for capital.
The fiscal path followed by the previous government was not sustainable. This government is determined to take a balanced and responsible approach to eliminating the structural deficit it inherited, while improving the programs and services that people value and need the most.
The government is committed to achieving its medium-term deficit reduction targets, balancing the budget in 2007-08, and to beginning the transitional process of moving towards a higher level of fiscal responsibility and transparency. This approach to fiscal planning is based on the overarching principles that fiscal planning should meet the priorities of the people of Ontario; governments should live within their means; all provincial spending, ministry plans and activities should produce specific results; and fiscal planning and reporting should be made more transparent.
By adhering to this approach, the Province is setting out a fiscal plan that is both realistic and sustainable. In particular, this approach will ensure that funding is directed to the priorities that matter to Ontarians and that these services are affordable in the longer term.
| Statement of Financial Transactions ($ Millions) |
Table A1 | ||||
| 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue * | 66,044 | 66,249 | 68,609 | 68,250 | 78,360 |
| Expense | |||||
| Programs | 51,146 | 53,647 | 56,922 | 62,518 | 66,695 |
| Capital ** | 2,123 | 1,890 | 1,876 | 2,202 | 2,575 |
| Interest on Debt | 10,873 | 10,337 | 9,694 | 9,752 | 10,329 |
| Total Expense | 64,142 | 65,874 | 68,492 | 74,472 | 79,599 |
| Reserve | - | - | - | - | 1,000 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | 1,902 | 375 | 117 | (6,222) | (2,239) |
| Net Debt † | 132,496 | 132,121 | 132,647 | 139,405 | 142,412 |
| Accumulated Deficit † | 132,496 | 132,121 | 118,705 | 124,927 | 127,166 |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3,881 million related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
** Starting in 2002-03, major tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries (land, buildings and transportation infrastructure) are accounted for on a full accrual accounting basis. Other tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries will continue to be accounted for as expense in the year of acquisition or construction. All capital assets owned by consolidated government organizations are accounted for on a full accrual basis.
† Net debt represents the difference between liabilities and financial assets. Accumulated deficit represents net debt adjusted for tangible capital assets.
| Revenue ($ Millions) |
Table A2 | ||||
| 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxation Revenue | |||||
| Personal Income Tax | 17,911 | 19,097 | 18,195 | 17,778 | 18,821 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 13,735 | 13,803 | 14,183 | 14,260 | 15,036 |
| Corporations Tax | 9,200 | 6,646 | 7,459 | 7,222 | 8,320 |
| Employer Health Tax | 3,424 | 3,502 | 3,589 | 3,737 | 3,874 |
| Gasoline Tax | 2,172 | 2,192 | 2,306 | 2,282 | 2,328 |
| Fuel Tax | 648 | 659 | 682 | 684 | 716 |
| Ontario Health Premium | - | - | - | - | 1,635 |
| Tobacco Tax | 504 | 703 | 1,183 | 1,299 | 1,452 |
| Land Transfer Tax | 642 | 665 | 814 | 911 | 927 |
| Electricity Payments-In-Lieu of Taxes | 907 | 387 | 711 | 597 | 630 |
| Other Taxes | 333 | 371 | 429 | 391 | 259 |
| 49,476 | 48,025 | 49,551 | 49,161 | 53,998 | |
| Government of Canada | |||||
| Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST) | 4,138 | 5,831 | 7,346 | 7,014 | - |
| Canada Health Transfer (CHT) | - | - | - | - | 4,677 |
| Canada Social Transfer (CST) | - | - | - | - | 2,924 |
| CHST Supplements | 757 | 380 | 191 | 577 | 775 |
| Social Housing | 541 | 524 | 525 | 522 | 521 |
| Health Reform Fund | - | - | - | 387 | 582 |
| Diagnostic/Medical Equipment | 190 | 190 | - | 193 | 193 |
| Infrastructure | 2 | - | 62 | 155 | 267 |
| Other Government of Canada | 501 | 829 | 770 | 1,114 | 859 |
| 6,129 | 7,754 | 8,894 | 9,962 | 10,798 | |
| Income from Investment in Government Business Enterprises | |||||
| Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation | 2,181 | 2,255 | 2,288 | 2,100 | 2,117 |
| Liquor Control Board of Ontario | 877 | 904 | 939 | 1,043 | 1,117 |
| Ontario Power Generation Inc. and Hydro One Inc. | 783 | 179 | 717 | (15) | 335 |
| Other Government Enterprises | 14 | 7 | (2) | (59) | (5) |
| 3,855 | 3,345 | 3,942 | 3,069 | 3,564 | |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | |||||
| Net Reduction of Power Purchase Contract Liability * | - | - | 161 | 104 | 4,024 |
| Reimbursements | 1,809 | 1,592 | 1,111 | 1,175 | 1,252 |
| Electricity Debt Retirement Charge | - | - | 889 | 1,000 | 1,009 |
| Vehicle and Driver Registration Fees | 929 | 941 | 982 | 986 | 987 |
| Power Sales | 695 | 815 | 635 | 510 | 675 |
| Other Fees and Licences | 503 | 474 | 606 | 505 | 536 |
| Liquor Licence Revenue | 525 | 530 | 530 | 486 | 499 |
| Sales and Rentals | 637 | 344 | 560 | 520 | 403 |
| Royalties | 235 | 224 | 304 | 243 | 239 |
| Miscellaneous Other Non-Tax Revenue | 1,251 | 2,205 | 444 | 529 | 376 |
| 6,584 | 7,125 | 6,222 | 6,058 | 10,000 | |
| Total Revenue | 66,044 | 66,249 | 68,609 | 68,250 | 78,360 |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3,881 million related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
| Operating Expense ($ Millions) |
Table A3 | ||||
| Ministry | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture and Food | 634 | 775 | 615 | 677 | 549 |
| Attorney General * | 969 | 995 | 1,052 | 1,156 | 1,162 |
| Board of Internal Economy | 116 | 124 | 146 | 204 | 149 |
| Children and Youth Services * | 2,070 | 2,244 | 2,431 | 2,643 | 2,832 |
| Citizenship and Immigration * | 65 | 59 | 53 | 56 | 62 |
| Community and Social Services * | 5,772 | 5,751 | 5,787 | 6,016 | 6,317 |
| Community Safety and Correctional Services * | 1,419 | 1,513 | 1,652 | 1,670 | 1,745 |
| Consumer and Business Services | 155 | 172 | 178 | 184 | 213 |
| Culture | 236 | 279 | 330 | 294 | 277 |
| Democratic Renewal Secretariat | - | - | - | - | 4 |
| Economic Development and Trade * | 200 | 221 | 241 | 260 | 414 |
| Education | 7,961 | 8,354 | 8,998 | 9,754 | 10,623 |
| Teachers Pension Plan (TPP) | (402) | 42 | 238 | 235 | 359 |
| Energy | 344 | 367 | 144 | 118 | 137 |
| Environment * | 190 | 265 | 237 | 260 | 304 |
| Executive Offices | 21 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 19 |
| Finance - Own Account * | 1,146 | 1,196 | 1,092 | 1,316 | 1,184 |
| Interest on Debt | 10,873 | 10,337 | 9,694 | 9,752 | 10,329 |
| Change Fund | - | - | - | - | 328 |
| Community Reinvestment Fund | 561 | 557 | 622 | 652 | 656 |
| Electricity Consumer Price Protection Fund | - | - | 665 | 253 | - |
| Power Purchases | 695 | 815 | 786 | 799 | 946 |
| Health and Long-Term Care * | 22,530 | 23,738 | 25,607 | 28,100 | 29,652 |
| Change Fund | - | - | - | - | 609 |
| SARS-related and Major One-Time Health Costs | - | - | - | 842 | - |
| Intergovernmental Affairs * | 6 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| Labour | 104 | 110 | 123 | 120 | 133 |
| Management Board Secretariat * | 144 | 246 | 172 | 268 | 355 |
| Retirement Benefits | (33) | 63 | 102 | 340 | 433 |
| Contingency Fund | - | - | - | - | 965 |
| Municipal Affairs and Housing * | 1,792 | 1,135 | 636 | 678 | 692 |
| Native Affairs Secretariat | 16 | 13 | 16 | 16 | 14 |
| Natural Resources | 417 | 438 | 454 | 518 | 505 |
| Northern Development and Mines | 69 | 75 | 73 | 79 | 73 |
| Office of Francophone Affairs | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Public Infrastructure Renewal * | 9 | 15 | 33 | 23 | 31 |
| Tourism and Recreation * | 124 | 143 | 135 | 213 | 184 |
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 3,219 | 3,248 | 3,471 | 3,934 | 4,194 |
| Transportation | 593 | 664 | 801 | 808 | 862 |
| Year-End Savings | - | - | - | - | (300) |
| Total Operating Expense | 62,019 | 63,984 | 66,616 | 72,270 | 77,024 |
* Ministries restated to reflect new government structure.
| Capital Expense † ($ Millions) |
Table A4 | ||||
| Ministry | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture and Food | 1 | 29 | 68 | 1 | 7 |
| Attorney General | 42 | 46 | 43 | 25 | 55 |
| Children and Youth Services * | 10 | 6 | 7 | - | 9 |
| Community and Social Services * | 4 | 25 | 16 | 10 | 21 |
| Community Safety and Correctional Services | 99 | 88 | 66 | 47 | 42 |
| Consumer and Business Services | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Culture | 18 | 14 | 42 | 28 | 70 |
| Economic Development and Trade * | - | 19 | 21 | 32 | 39 |
| Education | 4 | 17 | 10 | 16 | 27 |
| Energy | 86 | 50 | 46 | 54 | 52 |
| Environment | 22 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 13 |
| Finance * | 7 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Health and Long-Term Care | 322 | 205 | 339 | 355 | 346 |
| Management Board Secretariat ** | 24 | 28 | 3 | (1) | (13) |
| Municipal Affairs and Housing * | - | 12 | 20 | 208 | 234 |
| Native Affairs Secretariat | 5 | 3 | 2 | - | 2 |
| Natural Resources | 65 | 70 | 72 | 69 | 85 |
| Northern Development and Mines | 356 | 371 | 391 | 344 | 447 |
| Public Infrastructure Renewal * | 4 | - | 4 | 17 | 168 |
| Capital Contingency Fund | - | - | - | - | 150 |
| Tourism and Recreation | 14 | 9 | 55 | 54 | 65 |
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 204 | 49 | 71 | 121 | 171 |
| Transportation | 836 | 818 | 578 | 812 | 679 |
| Year-End Savings | - | - | - | - | (100) |
| Total Capital Expense † | 2,123 | 1,890 | 1,876 | 2,202 | 2,575 |
† Starting in 2002-03, major tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries (land, buildings and transportation infrastructure) are accounted for on a full accrual accounting basis. Other tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries will continue to be accounted for as expense in the year of acquisition or construction. All capital assets owned by consolidated government organizations are accounted for on a full accrual basis.
* Ministries restated to reflect new government structure.
** Ministries contributions for investments in Provincially owned land and buildings are recorded as an expense by the contributing ministries. Starting in 2002-03 any resulting adjustment to expense from the capitalization and amortization of most of these Provincially owned land and buildings is recorded in Management Board Secretariat.
Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal.
| Schedule of Net Investment in Capital Assets ($ Millions) |
Table A5 | |||
| 2004-05 Plan | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land and Buildings | Transportation Infrastructure | Government Organizations Capital Assets | Total | |
| Acquisition/Construction of Major Tangible Capital Assets | 135 | 998 | 432 | 1,565 |
| Amortization of Provincially Owned Major Tangible Capital Assets | (78) | (524) | (195) | (797) |
| Net Investment in Capital Assets * | 57 | 474 | 237 | 768 |
* Starting in 2002-03, major tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries (land, buildings and transportation infrastructure) are accounted for on a full accrual accounting basis. Other tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries will continue to be accounted for as expense in the year of acquisition or construction. All capital assets owned by consolidated government organizations are accounted for on a full accrual basis.
Source: Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal.
| Ten-Year Review of Selected Financial and Economic Statistics ($ Millions) |
Table A6 | |||||||||
| 1995-96 | 1996-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-99 | 1999-00 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | Actual 2002-03 |
Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Transactions | ||||||||||
| Revenue * | 49,473 | 49,450 | 52,518 | 55,786 | 64,804 | 66,044 | 66,249 | 68,609 | 68,250 | 78,360 |
| Expense | ||||||||||
| Programs | 46,163 | 45,136 | 45,304 | 46,557 | 48,222 | 51,146 | 53,647 | 56,922 | 62,518 | 66,695 |
| Capital ** | 3,635 | 2,612 | 2,451 | 2,215 | 4,887 | 2,123 | 1,890 | 1,876 | 2,202 | 2,575 |
| Interest on Debt | 8,475 | 8,607 | 8,729 | 9,016 | 11,027 | 10,873 | 10,337 | 9,694 | 9,752 | 10,329 |
| Total Expense | 58,273 | 56,355 | 56,484 | 57,788 | 64,136 | 64,142 | 65,874 | 68,492 | 74,472 | 79,599 |
| Reserve | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,000 |
| Surplus / (Deficit) | (8,800) | (6,905) | (3,966) | (2,002) | 668 | 1,902 | 375 | 117 | (6,222) | (2,239) |
| Net Debt † | 101,864 | 108,769 | 112,735 | 114,737 | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 132,647 | 139,405 | 142,412 |
| Accumulated Deficit † | 101,864 | 108,769 | 112,735 | 114,737 | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 118,705 | 124,927 | 127,166 |
| Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at Market Prices | 329,317 | 338,173 | 359,353 | 377,897 | 409,020 | 440,708 | 452,923 | 478,112 | 493,416 | 513,519 |
| Personal Income | 271,397 | 276,303 | 289,537 | 304,652 | 321,702 | 347,427 | 359,783 | 372,444 | 381,005 | 393,959 |
| Population-July (000s) | 10,950 | 11,083 | 11,228 | 11,367 | 11,506 | 11,685 | 11,898 | 12,097 | 12,238 | 12,397 |
| Net Debt per Capita (dollars) | 9,303 | 9,814 | 10,041 | 10,094 | 11,681 | 11,339 | 11,104 | 10,965 | 11,391 | 11,488 |
| Personal Income per Capita (dollars) | 24,785 | 24,930 | 25,787 | 26,801 | 27,959 | 29,733 | 30,239 | 30,788 | 31,133 | 31,779 |
| Total Expense as a per cent of GDP | 17.7 | 16.7 | 15.7 | 15.3 | 15.7 | 14.6 | 14.5 | 14.3 | 15.1 | 15.5 |
| Interest on Debt as a per cent of Revenue | 17.1 | 17.4 | 16.6 | 16.2 | 17.0 | 16.5 | 15.6 | 14.1 | 14.3 | 13.2 |
| Net Debt as a per cent of GDP | 30.9 | 32.2 | 31.4 | 30.4 | 32.9 | 30.1 | 29.2 | 27.7 | 28.3 | 27.7 |
| Accumulated Deficit as a per cent of GDP | 30.9 | 32.2 | 31.4 | 30.4 | 32.9 | 30.1 | 29.2 | 24.8 | 25.3 | 24.8 |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3,881 million related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
** Starting in 2002-03, major tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries (land, buildings and transportation infrastructure) are accounted for on a full accrual accounting basis. Other tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries will continue to be accounted for as expense in the year of acquisition or construction. All capital assets owned by consolidated government organizations are accounted for on a full accrual basis.
† Net debt represents the difference between liabilities and financial assets. Accumulated deficit represents net debt adjusted for tangible capital assets.
Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Statistics Canada.
| Multi-Year Balanced Budget Plan ($ Billions) |
Table A7 | ||||
| Interim 2003-04 |
Plan 2004-05 |
Outlook | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | |||
| Revenue * | 68.3 | 78.4 | 79.9 | 82.5 | 86.0 |
| Expense | |||||
| Programs | 62.5 | 66.7 | 67.2 | 68.9 | 70.6 |
| Capital | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Interest on Debt | 9.8 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 11.5 |
| Total Expense | 74.5 | 79.6 | 80.5 | 82.5 | 84.5 |
| Reserve | - | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | (6.2) | (2.2) | (2.1) | (1.5) | 0.0 |
| Net Debt † | 139.4 | 142.4 | 145.4 | 147.9 | 148.7 |
| Accumulated Deficit † | 124.9 | 127.2 | 129.2 | 130.7 | 130.7 |
| Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at Market Prices | 493.4 | 513.5 | 539.2 | 567.3 | 597.4 |
| Net Debt as a per cent of GDP | 28.3 | 27.7 | 27.0 | 26.1 | 24.9 |
| Accumulated Deficit as a per cent of GDP | 25.3 | 24.8 | 24.0 | 23.0 | 21.9 |
* Includes one-time revenue gain of $3.9 billion related to the projected elimination of the liability for non-utility generator power purchase agreements in 2004-05.
† Net debt represents the difference between liabilities and financial assets. Accumulated deficit represents net debt adjusted for tangible capital assets.
Numbers may not add due to rounding.




General inquiries regarding the 2004 Ontario Budget: Budget Papersshould be directed to:
Ministry of Finance Information Centre
Toll-free
English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222
Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776
For electronic copies of this document, visit our Web site at
/english/budget/ontariobudgets/2004/index.html
Printed copies are available from:
Publications Ontario
880 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1N8
Telephone: (416) 326-5300
Toll-free: 1-800-668-9938
TTY Toll-free:
1-800-268-7095
Web site:
www.publications.gov.on.ca
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2004
ISBN 0-7794-6231-9