The Ontario Government has succeeded in eliminating the deficit while investing in key priority areas that matter to Ontarians.
When the government came to office in 2003, an independent review of Ontario’s finances concluded that the Province was on track to post a significant deficit in 2003–04 — since confirmed to have been $5.5 billion. This fiscal year, despite weaker-than-expected economic growth, the Province is projected to post its second consecutive surplus. The government has been able to accomplish this while investing in key priority areas such as health, education, infrastructure and postsecondary education.
It is anticipated that 2007–08 will end with a surplus of $350 million if, as has been the case in the previous three years, the reserve is not required. The outlook for 2008 and beyond calls for economic growth to strengthen in a more favourable global environment, boosted by an expected rebound in the auto sector. Corresponding to this outlook for strengthening economic growth, the Province is on track to post surpluses of $1.3 billion in 2008–09 and $1.6 billion in 2009–10. This considerable improvement in the Province’s fiscal position means that, if the reserve is not required in 2007–08, the Province is on track to post five consecutive fiscal surpluses between 2005–06 and 2009–10.
This Budget demonstrates that the government’s plan for Ontario is working. Consecutive surpluses and an improving debt-to-GDP ratio combined with ongoing strategic investments in key priorities will continue to strengthen the economy. In addition, significant steps (outlined in Chapter I, Section H: Expanding Opportunities through a Modern and Efficient Government) have been taken to ensure that the government’s operations are efficient and effective while improving fiscal transparency, accountability and financial management to assure Ontarians that their tax dollars are being spent wisely.
The accomplishments of the government, coupled with the hard work of Ontarians, ensure that the province is on a sound economic footing going forward.

Ontario’s economy has grown and created jobs over the past three years, despite significant challenges arising from the global economic environment. Certain sectors have been affected by higher oil prices, the stronger Canadian dollar, rising interest rates and emerging competition from newly industrializing economies. In 2006, the economy also had to contend with restructuring in the auto sector, combined with lower U.S. demand for Ontario’s automotive and forestry products. Despite these challenges, Ontario’s real gross domestic product (GDP) was 7.5 per cent higher in 2006 than in 2003. Ontario job creation has been solid, with 327,000 net new jobs created since October 2003 — 74 per cent of which are full time. The Ontario economy has shown considerable resilience in these challenging times, with growth in output and employment above the average private-sector forecast in two of the past three years.
The Ontario economy is poised for stronger economic growth over the next few years. Businesses have remained confident, investing almost $147 billion in physical capital over the past three years. The Ontario Government has also made significant investments in the economy, as outlined in Chapter I, Section G: Investing in Ontario’s Infrastructure. These investments will help transform Ontario’s economy to compete and succeed in the 21st century.
Increasing employment and wages have boosted disposable income by more than 12 per cent over the past three years. There has been very strong employment growth in sectors paying above-average wages such as finance, education, health care, construction and professional services. Consumer spending has remained robust, growing by over 11 per cent in constant dollar terms since 2003. Ontario exports have continued to grow, with healthy increases in interprovincial exports as Ontario industries have taken advantage of the western provinces’ booming economies.
The ability of the Ontario economy to grow and attract investment, despite recent external challenges, reflects its strong fundamentals and sound economic management. The Province’s highly skilled workforce, high quality of life, universal medical care, sound public infrastructure and competitive taxes are all important parts of its competitive advantage. These strengths will help Ontario thrive with a technology-driven, innovative economy. The government’s role in fostering an environment that contributes to long-term growth is discussed further in Chapter I, Section F: Expanding Opportunities for Economic Growth.

When the government came to office in 2003, an independent review of Ontario’s finances concluded that the Province was on track to post a significant deficit in 2003–04, which has since been confirmed to have been $5.5 billion. Ontario has made progress to eliminate the structural deficit through prudent and disciplined fiscal management, while taking a balanced approach to investing in key priority areas.
This disciplined plan to eliminate the structural deficit has yielded results. The government has exceeded its planned deficit targets in each fiscal year since 2003–04. In 2004–05, the deficit was reduced to $1.6 billion, and in 2005–06 the Province posted a surplus of $0.3 billion.
This fiscal year, higher revenues combined with lower interest on debt expense have enabled the government to project a surplus of $0.3 billion for 2006–07 while continuing to make investments in priority areas such as health, education, infrastructure and postsecondary education. This is a significant improvement upon the 2006 Ontario Budget projection for a $2.4 billion deficit in 2006–07, and would be the Province’s second consecutive surplus.

Ontario’s economic growth is expected to strengthen over the 2007 to 2009 period. This is based on signs that growth improved late in 2006 as well as positive developments unfolding in the global economic environment. The growth outlook is also enhanced by significant economic investments, including over $190 million for an economic stimulus package announced in the 2006 Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review to accelerate infrastructure investments while creating local jobs, invest in Ontario tourism, promote interprovincial trade opportunities, and assist laid-off workers with training and re-employment plans.
Recent economic indicators point to stronger economic growth for Ontario. Preliminary estimates indicate that real GDP growth strengthened in the October to December quarter of 2006. Employment growth accelerated over the final months of 2006 and into 2007, with the creation of more than 70,000 new jobs since September 2006. Retail sales strengthened in the final two months of the year, rising by a cumulative 3.6 per cent. There was also a resurgence in Ontario’s international exports, which rebounded by more than five per cent in the fourth quarter of 2006.
The global economic environment is unfolding more favourably for Ontario. The outlook for oil prices, the Canadian dollar and U.S. economic growth are all more positive than they were a few months ago. Private-sector forecasters are now projecting lower oil prices over the next three years compared to last fall. This would be positive for the Ontario economy, since lower oil prices reduce business costs and leave consumers with more disposable income to spend on goods and services. The Canadian dollar is expected to be slightly weaker over the next three years compared to 2006, reducing some of the challenges that Ontario’s export-oriented manufacturing businesses have faced. The outlook for the U.S. economy has also become more upbeat in recent months. Inflation is well contained, and current signs are that the Bank of Canada will keep interest rates stable in the coming year.
Ontario is expected to create an additional 270,000 jobs over the next three years, and its unemployment rate is expected to fall to an average of 6.1 per cent in 2009 — the lowest rate since 2000. The government’s infrastructure investments and energy initiatives (as outlined in Chapter I, Section G: Investing in Ontario’s Infrastructure) will create almost half a million jobs over the next several years. Strong job growth and solid wage gains will lead to robust income growth. Rising incomes, low interest rates and increasing wealth will support growing household spending. Business investment spending is expected to remain buoyant as firms invest to improve their competitive position. Ontario’s trade is expected to bounce back as U.S. auto demand picks up and new auto product lines come on stream. For more information, see Section C: Ontario’s Economic Outlook
There are no tax increases in this Budget. The growing Ontario economy will drive taxation revenue growth over the next three years. Tax reductions introduced previously and in this Budget result in modest reductions in the growth of taxation revenues projected over the next three years. Revenue growth will enable the government to continue making key investments in Ontario while balancing the budget. For further details, see Section D: Ontario’s Revenue Outlook.
This fiscal year, higher revenues combined with lower interest on debt expense have enabled the government to project a surplus of $0.3 billion for 2006–07, the Province’s second consecutive surplus. This is a significant improvement upon the 2006 Ontario Budget projection for a $2.4 billion deficit in 2006–07.

The government is committed to maintaining balanced budgets. The medium-term fiscal outlook now projects surpluses of $0.4 billion in 2007–08, $1.3 billion in 2008–09 and $1.6 billion in 2009–10, if the reserve is not required. This considerable improvement in the Province’s fiscal position means that, if the reserve is not required in 2007–08, the Province is on track to post five consecutive fiscal surpluses between 2005–06 and 2009–10.
The medium-term fiscal outlook continues to maintain the government’s commitment to keep the overall growth in spending better aligned with revenue growth. Annual growth in total expense over the medium term is expected to average 2.7 per cent, which is less than the 3.4 per cent average annual growth in revenue forecast over the same period.
The Province’s debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to continue to improve to 17.4 per cent by 2009–10, compared to 25.2 per cent in 2003–04.
Five consecutive fiscal surpluses, a prudent and improving debt-to-GDP ratio combined with ongoing strategic investments in key priorities will continue to strengthen the economy and ensure that Ontario is well positioned to manage both the challenges and opportunities ahead.
For more information, see Section E: Ontario’s Fiscal Outlook. Fiscal tables and graphs are summarized in Section G: Details of Ontario’s Finances.
The government has eliminated the $5.5 billion deficit it inherited and is projecting its second consecutive surplus in 2006–07. In fact, while the 2006 Budget projected a $2,350 million deficit this year, the Province is currently on track to achieve a modest surplus of $310 million for 2006–07.
| Budget Plan |
Interim | In-Year Change |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 85,730 | 89,143 | 3,413 |
| Expense | |||
| Programs | 77,651 | 79,992 | 2,341 |
| Interest on Debt | 9,429 | 8,841 | (588) |
| Total Expense | 87,080 | 88,833 | 1,753 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) Before Reserve | (1,350) | 310 | 1,660 |
| Reserve | 1,000 | – | (1,000) |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | (2,350) | 310 | 2,660 |
| Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. | |||
Total revenues in 2006–07 are projected to be $89,143 million, a 4.0 per cent increase over the 2006 Budget projection.
Total expense is projected to increase to $88,833 million, an increase of $1,753 million from the 2006 Budget Plan.
The $1.0 billion reserve, included in the 2006 Budget Plan to help achieve the government’s overall fiscal objectives and protect against unexpected and adverse changes in the economic and fiscal outlook, was not required.
The 2006–07 interim results reported in this Budget are based on the best information available as of early March 2007. Given the preliminary nature of these estimates, interim projections are subject to change as actual year-end revenue and expense are finalized in the 2006–07 Public Accounts.
Total revenue in 2006–07 is currently estimated at $89,143 million, an increase of $3,413 million from the 2006 Budget Plan.
| Interim 2006–07 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Taxation Revenue | ||
| Personal Income Tax | 1,614 | |
| Corporations Tax | 631 | |
| Employer Health Tax | 62 | |
| Tobacco Tax | (217) | |
| Land Transfer Tax | 78 | |
| Electricity Payments-in-Lieu of Taxes | (84) | |
| All Other Taxes Combined | 132 | |
| 2,216 | ||
| Government of Canada | ||
| 2006 Federal Budget Trusts | 456 | |
| All Other Government of Canada | 140 | |
| 596 | ||
| Income from Government Enterprises | ||
| Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation | 84 | |
| Liquor Control Board of Ontario | 36 | |
| Ontario Power Generation Inc. and Hydro One Inc. | (46) | |
| All Other Government Enterprises Combined | (6) | |
| 68 | ||
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | ||
| Sales and Rentals | 595 | |
| Power Sales | (181) | |
| Other | 119 | |
| 533 | ||
| Total Revenue Changes | 3,413 | |
| Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. | ||
Total expense in 2006–07 is currently projected to be $88,833 million, an increase of $1,753 million from the 2006 Budget forecast. This increase is primarily due to additional investments in Ontario’s health sector, and spending in priority areas financed by about $1 billion in one-time proceeds from both the Teranet IPO and revenue from the federal trusts announced in the 2006 federal budget. Other key areas of increased spending in 2006–07 include transit and roads, social services, municipalities, rural infrastructure, and education.
| Interim 1 2006–07 | |
|---|---|
| Program Expense Changes: | |
| Transit and Roads | 819 |
| Health Sector Funding | 568 |
| Agriculture, Rural and Resources Sector Support | 279 |
| Social Services | 199 |
| Training, Colleges and Universities | 191 |
| Municipalities and Housing | 157 |
| Education Sector | 114 |
| Justice Sector | 98 |
| All Other (net) Program Expense Changes | (84) |
| Total Program Expense Changes 2 | 2,341 |
| Interest on Debt Savings | (588) |
| Total In-Year Expense Changes | 1,753 |
| 1 Excludes the impact of adjustments made in the 2007 Budget to reflect transfers from various ministries to school boards, hospitals and colleges. 2 Includes one-time spending of about $1.0 billion financed by the Teranet IPO and the 2006 federal trusts. Sources: Ontario Ministries of Finance and Public Infrastructure Renewal. |
|
Total expense increased by $1,753 million in-year from the 2006 Budget forecast. This is due to an increase in program expense of $2,341 million, offset by $588 million in interest on debt savings.
This section outlines Ontario’s current macroeconomic outlook, which is the basis for the revenue outlook outlined in Section D: Ontario’s Revenue Outlook. The economic forecast underlying the fiscal plan is intended to be prudent. The Ministry of Finance’s real GDP growth planning projection is below the average private-sector forecast every year.
The Ministry of Finance is projecting Ontario real GDP growth of 1.6 per cent in 2007. Ontario’s growth rebounded in the fourth quarter of 2006 and is expected to strengthen through 2007 as U.S. demand picks up steam and the lower Canadian dollar and oil prices stimulate economic activity. Real GDP growth is expected to improve over the medium term, with the Ministry of Finance projecting growth of 2.8 per cent in 2008 and 3.1 per cent in 2009. Improving growth over the medium term reflects a more favourable global economic environment, along with Ontario’s strong fundamentals. Business investment spending is expected to lead growth as firms invest to improve their competitive position. Strong income gains, low interest rates and increasing wealth will support growing household spending. Ontario’s trade is expected to turn around as U.S. auto demand picks up and new auto product lines come on stream.
The moderation in oil prices and the lower Canadian dollar are both welcome developments. Oil prices are currently trading at around $60 US per barrel, down from a peak of over $78 US last July. Private-sector forecasters expect oil prices to average $60 US per barrel in 2007 — more than $6 US per barrel lower than in 2006. The Canadian dollar has fallen to around 85 cents US recently, from a peak of over 91 cents US in May 2006. Private-sector forecasters expect the exchange rate to average under 86 cents US for 2007, down over 2 cents US from 2006. U.S. economic growth is expected to improve through 2007 and strengthen over the medium term. Interest rates are expected to remain low over the foreseeable future.
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007p | 2008p | 2009p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real GDP Growth | 3.2 | 2.8 | 1.3e | 1.6 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| Nominal GDP Growth | 4.9 | 3.9 | 2.9e | 3.1 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| CPI Inflation | 1.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| e = estimate; p = projection. Sources: Statistics Canada and Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
||||||
As part of the Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act, 2004, the Minister of Finance has established the Ontario Economic Forecast Council to provide advice on economic projections and assumptions. Council members are Peter Dungan from the University of Toronto, Ernie Stokes from the Centre for Spatial Economics, Dale Orr from Global Insight and Glen Hodgson of the Conference Board of Canada. Forming the council ensures that the Ontario Government’s economic forecasts take into account the expertise and viewpoints of non-government experts. Council members were asked to review the economic assumptions underlying this Budget as of March 1, 2007. The members who were able to respond to this request provided letters stating that the forecast was reasonable.
Economic projections are a key building block upon which the government’s fiscal plan is based. To establish reasonable and accountable economic projections, the Ministry of Finance consults extensively with private-sector forecasters. The Minister of Finance met with Ontario Economic Forecast Council members and other private-sector forecasters twice over the past year, in the process of preparing the 2006 Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review and the 2007 Budget. Through these meetings, the Minister received their independent expert opinion on the outlook for the Ontario economy and economic policy advice.
Private-sector forecasters generally expect Ontario real GDP growth to strengthen over the next three years. The average of private-sector forecasts for Ontario real GDP growth is 1.7 per cent in 2007, 2.9 per cent in 2008 and 3.2 per cent in 2009. Ministry of Finance planning assumptions used to develop the fiscal plan are deliberately prudent, and are below the private-sector average every year.
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conference Board of Canada (February) | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Global Insight (January) | 1.4 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Centre for Spatial Economics (January) | 1.8 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| University of Toronto (January) | 1.6 | 3.0 | 3.4 |
| RBC Financial Group (January) | 2.0 | 3.1 | – |
| Scotiabank Group (February) | 1.6 | 2.4 | – |
| TD Bank Financial Group (January) | 1.6 | 3.4 | – |
| BMO Capital Markets (January) | 1.7 | 2.4 | – |
| CIBC World Markets (February) | 1.4 | 2.6 | – |
| Private-Sector Survey Average | 1.7 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Ontario’s Planning Assumption | 1.6 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Ontario Ministry of Finance Survey of Forecasts (March 1, 2007). | |||
The short-term Ontario economic outlook is strongly influenced by external factors, such as oil prices, the Canadian dollar exchange rate, U.S. economic growth and interest rates. The next section discusses the more favourable outlook for external factors in greater detail as well as the forecast for Ontario’s exports. This is followed by a discussion of the outlook for jobs, household spending and investment.

Oil prices are projected to ease over the forecast horizon as increased refining and production capacity comes on stream. Ontario imports virtually all of its oil and natural gas requirements. Lower oil and gas prices cut costs for Ontario businesses and households, resulting in higher real disposable income. This frees up more money to spend on other goods and services.
Crude oil prices averaged $66.10 US per barrel in 2006, marking the fifth consecutive year that oil prices rose. However, progress has been made to reduce the impact of higher energy prices. The Ontario economy is over 50 per cent more energy efficient now than it was during the oil shocks in the 1970s.
The average private-sector forecast for oil prices is currently $60 US per barrel for 2007. This would be the first annual decline in oil prices since 2001. Projections for oil prices range from $57 US per barrel to $69 US per barrel in 2007. As new global production and refining capacity comes online over the medium term, forecasters expect oil prices to average roughly $60 US per barrel per year in 2007 through 2009.
| 2007p | 2008p | 2009p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private-Sector Average | 60.0 | 59.7 | 60.0 |
| High | 69.0 | 68.0 | 62.5 |
| Low | 57.0 | 50.0 | 55.3 |
| Ministry of Finance | 61.0 | 61.0 | 61.0 |
| p = projection. Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Ontario Ministry of Finance Survey of Forecasts (March 1, 2007). |
|||
Natural gas prices averaged $6.99 US per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in 2006, down from a record annual average of $9.00 US per MMBtu in 2005. Forecasters generally expect natural gas prices to average about $7.50 US per MMBtu each year over the forecast horizon.

Growth in the United States is expected to strengthen through 2007 and expand at a solid pace over the medium term. The U.S. economy is vital to Ontario’s economic performance, particularly as the province’s largest export market.
Private-sector forecasters, on average, call for U.S. real GDP growth of 2.7 per cent in 2007, 3.0 per cent in 2008 and 3.1 per cent in 2009. However, there are risks to the U.S. outlook. House prices have peaked and the recent slowing and outright declines in certain regions of the country have dragged down residential construction. Lower house prices have also reduced the funds available through mortgage equity withdrawal for consumer spending. However, the negative impact of the housing deterioration has been offset by robust labour income growth and lower energy prices, both of which have supported consumer spending.

After strengthening against the U.S. dollar for four consecutive years, the Canadian dollar is forecast to weaken in 2007 and then appreciate gradually in 2008 and 2009. This moderation will benefit Ontario’s export-oriented manufacturing sector, improving its competitive position. It would also encourage U.S. travel to Ontario.
The Canadian dollar appreciated from 61.8 cents US in January 2002 to a peak of over 91 cents US in May 2006, a 28-year high. Since then, the dollar has eased and currently trades at around 85 cents US. Still, on a trade-weighted basis, the Canadian dollar has appreciated more than any other major currency since the beginning of 2002, primarily reflecting rising commodity prices.
Forecasters predict softer oil prices, which are expected to keep the dollar close to its current value, improving the competitive position of Ontario’s industries. The private sector expects the Canadian dollar to average 85.8 cents US in 2007, 87.2 cents US in 2008 and 87.3 cents US in 2009. For planning purposes, it is assumed the Canadian dollar will average 86.0 cents US in 2007, 87.5 cents US in 2008 and 88.0 cents US in 2009.
Ontario exporters will face continuing strong competitive pressures from newly industrializing economies but will benefit from a weaker Canadian dollar. Exports are equivalent to about 60 per cent of Ontario’s economy. International exports account for about 70 per cent of total exports, with the balance going to other provinces.
| 2007p | 2008p | 2009p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private-Sector Average | 85.8 | 87.2 | 87.3 |
| High | 89.0 | 90.0 | 88.6 |
| Low | 83.7 | 85.3 | 86.2 |
| Ministry of Finance | 86.0 | 87.5 | 88.0 |
| p = projection. Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Ontario Ministry of Finance Survey of Forecasts (March 1, 2007). |
|||
Exports rebounded strongly in the fourth quarter of 2006 and should continue to grow over the forecast period as U.S. auto demand picks up and new product lines come on stream. Exports are forecast to rise by 1.5 per cent in 2007 and by an average of 3.6 per cent in 2008 and 2009.
A strong Canadian dollar, weaker U.S. demand and competitive pressures in the auto industry negatively affected Ontario’s exports in 2006. The volume of exports rose only 0.2 per cent in 2006, after rising 1.7 per cent in 2005.

The auto sector accounted for 41 per cent of Ontario’s international merchandise exports in 2006, with 97 per cent destined for the United States. Ontario automotive exports declined 7.6 per cent in 2006, reflecting weaker U.S. demand and industry restructuring. The outlook for 2007 suggests ongoing challenges, but growth is expected to resume in 2008. U.S. auto sales are anticipated to dip to 16.3 million units in 2007, down from 16.5 million units in 2006, before climbing back up to 16.5 million units in 2008.
Auto production is expected to be flat in Ontario in 2007, after declining over 4.0 per cent in 2006. With the opening of new production plants and the expectation of strong U.S. demand, the foundations have been laid for strong export growth in 2008. Ontario will continue to lead Michigan as the largest auto producer in North America. Ontario production is expected to increase sharply in 2008 as new product lines come on stream, including at the new Toyota plant in Woodstock.

Ontario’s trade will continue to diversify as the share of interprovincial trade and exports to countries other than the United States continue to rise. Over the past five years, the value of merchandise exports to the rest of the world, excluding the United States, rose by 94 per cent. The European Union (EU) is Ontario’s second-largest trading partner, accounting for over six per cent of Ontario’s international exports. Exports to the EU have risen 110 per cent over the last five years and were up 27 per cent in 2006. Ontario exports to Mexico have risen 52 per cent over the last five years and were up almost 25 per cent in 2006. China accounts for one per cent of Ontario’s international exports, but Ontario’s exports to China have risen by 80 per cent over the past five years and by 18 per cent in 2006.
A number of initiatives have been taken to improve Ontario’s international trade, including Premier McGuinty’s January 2007 trade mission to India and Pakistan. Ontarians and their Indian counterparts signed dozens of cooperation agreements, including several reached by universities, colleges and research organizations. Ontario and Punjab, Pakistan’s largest province, signed a joint declaration of cooperation designed to foster trade, investment and jobs and agreed to explore opportunities in a broad range of sectors. Although exports to India, consisting mainly of machinery and equipment, account for only 0.1 per cent of total Ontario international exports, they have grown by 231 per cent over the last five years.

The share of Ontario exports of goods and services to other provinces and territories has grown steadily in the last five years, climbing to about 30 per cent of total exports. Between 2001 and 2006, exports to other provinces grew nearly 15 per cent, while international exports were unchanged. Exports to other provinces rose 1.2 per cent in 2006, compared to a 1.0 per cent decline in international exports. Ontario is undertaking a number of measures to boost interprovincial trade, including trade missions to Alberta and exploring the merits of joining the Alberta–British Columbia Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA).

Ontario’s imports grew in 2006 on the back of strong domestic demand. The stronger dollar encouraged imports of machinery and equipment, reflecting robust business investment. The United States accounted for most of the increase in merchandise imports, but other regions are also becoming more important. Imports from China, which consist mainly of consumer electronics such as computers, accounted for almost eight per cent of total international imports and rose 16 per cent in 2006. Import growth is expected to slow to 2.5 per cent in 2007 and then rebound in 2008 and 2009, rising by an average of 3.4 per cent per year.
Interest rates are expected to remain low and inflation is expected to remain below 2.0 per cent over the medium term, providing a favourable environment for Ontario businesses, and encouraging new investment and greater productivity.
Since May 2006, the Bank of Canada has maintained its benchmark target for the overnight interest rate at 4.25 per cent. According to the Bank, the Canadian economy is operating at, or just above, its production capacity, and it views the risks between faster and slower inflation as balanced.

Private-sector forecasters generally expect interest rates to remain unchanged in 2007 and to rise modestly in 2008. Canadian three-month treasury bill rates are projected to average 4.1 per cent in 2007, 4.3 per cent in 2008 and 4.5 per cent in 2009. Ten-year Government of Canada bond yields are forecast to average 4.2 per cent in 2007, 4.7 per cent in 2008 and 5.1 per cent in 2009. Although interest rates are projected to edge higher over the medium term, they are expected to remain well below their historical averages.
Despite higher energy prices in 2006, overall inflation in Ontario averaged 1.8 per cent, down from 2.2 per cent in 2005. Excluding energy prices, the Ontario consumer price index (CPI) inflation rate has remained below two per cent since early 2004. The rising Canadian dollar has helped offset some of the impact of higher energy prices on Ontario CPI inflation, lowering the price of imported goods. Looking forward, analysts generally expect the exchange rate to remain relatively stable and have little impact on inflation.
| 2007p | 2008p | 2009p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-month Treasury Bill Rate | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| 10-year Government Bond Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 5.1 |
| Ontario CPI Inflation Rate | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| p = projection. Sources: Bank of Canada, Statistics Canada and Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
||||
Ontario’s CPI inflation rate is expected to fall to a nine-year low of 1.3 per cent in 2007, reflecting lower energy prices, the impact of the 1.0 percentage point GST reduction introduced on July 1, 2006 and gradual slowing in housing costs. A fire at Imperial Oil’s refinery in Nanticoke in mid-February 2007 contributed to a gasoline shortage and a price surge. The impact on inflation will likely be temporary. Once the impact of the 2006 GST cut no longer affects year-to-year price changes and energy prices stabilize, CPI inflation is forecast to average 1.9 per cent in both 2008 and 2009.
The growth rate of the U.S. economy, crude oil prices, interest rates and the exchange rate can have a significant influence on Ontario’s economy. Table 9 shows the typical range for the first- and second-year impacts of these external factors on Ontario real GDP growth. These estimates are based on historical relationships and illustrate the upper and lower limits for the average response. They show the implications of changes in key assumptions in isolation from changes to other external factors. The combination of changing circumstances can also have a substantial bearing on the actual outcome.
| First Year | Second Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Dollar Depreciates by Five Cents US | 0.2 to 0.9 | 0.7 to 1.4 |
| World Crude Oil Prices Decrease by $10 US per Barrel | 0.3 to 0.7 | 0.1 to 0.5 |
| U.S. Real GDP Growth Increases by One Percentage Point | 0.3 to 0.7 | 0.4 to 0.8 |
| Canadian Interest Rates Decrease by One Percentage Point | 0.1 to 0.5 | 0.2 to 0.6 |
| 1 Impacts based on changes being sustained. Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
||
This section presents the forecast for job creation, income growth, household spending and business investment.

Ontario’s job creation is expected to continue as the economy grows. Since October 2003, 327,000 jobs have been created, with full-time positions accounting for almost three-quarters of the increase. Over the 2007 to 2009 period, 270,000 jobs are projected, consistent with private-sector forecasts. The unemployment rate is expected to fall as job gains exceed the projected increase in the labour force.
Ontario’s economy added 95,000 net jobs in 2006 — a 1.5 per cent increase. These job gains pushed Ontario’s unemployment rate down to 6.3 per cent — the lowest annual rate in five years. A healthy labour market performance resulted in solid wage gains. The average hourly wage rate for all employees, both permanent and temporary, was $20.65 in 2006 — up 2.9 per cent from 2005.

Ontario is expected to create an additional 71,000 jobs this year, an increase of 1.1 per cent. Employment growth is expected to pick up to 1.4 per cent or 90,000 jobs in 2008 and 1.6 per cent or 109,000 jobs in 2009. Forecasting the unemployment rate is more uncertain given its sensitivity to assumptions regarding population growth and changing participation rates. Solid employment growth along with the Ministry of Finance’s projection of relatively slower labour-force growth should lower Ontario’s unemployment rate to 6.1 per cent by 2009. Steady gains in employment and solid wage increases will mean rising incomes for Ontario workers. Labour income is forecast to rise by 3.9 per cent this year and by an average of 4.9 per cent in 2008 and 2009.
Personal income grew strongly in 2006, rising by 4.6 per cent, reflecting a 4.2 per cent rise in labour income and strong growth in investment income. Income growth far outstripped the 1.8 per cent inflation rate. Personal income is projected to rise by 3.9 per cent in 2007 and by an average of 4.8 per cent in 2008 and 2009.

Rising incomes, low interest rates and increasing wealth will support growing household spending. However, the pace of spending is projected to moderate as housing-related purchases are forecast to slow as fewer people buy homes.
Ontario household finances are in good shape to support consumer spending over the medium term. Canadian household debt costs as a share of after-tax income was 7.8 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2006, below the 8.1 per cent average over 1980 to 2006. Steadily rising incomes and historically low interest rates have helped keep interest costs low as a percentage of income.
Real consumer spending grew by an estimated 4.0 per cent last year, supported by strong income gains and low interest rates. Consumer spending on goods and services is projected to moderate, growing by 2.8 per cent in 2007, reflecting weaker labour income growth. Over 2008 and 2009, consumer spending is forecast to grow by an average of 2.9 per cent per year, in line with growth in real personal disposable income.
Retail sales rose 4.1 per cent in 2006, following a 4.7 per cent increase in 2005. Most home-related stores saw buoyant growth as consumers continued renovating and decorating their homes. However, the softening of the housing market is expected to dampen these purchases in the future. Sales in the auto sector grew 3.8 per cent in 2006 as gasoline and used and recreational motor vehicles and parts sales were vigorous, offsetting weakness in new vehicle sales, which were up just 0.1 per cent. The moderation in new car sales is expected to continue into 2007, which will limit overall retail sales growth since new car sales account for about 20 per cent of Ontario retail sales. Retail sales are expected to rise by 3.6 per cent this year and pick up over the medium term, averaging 4.6 per cent over the 2008 and 2009 period.

Moderate house-price increases, a favourable mortgage rate outlook and relatively strong income growth will continue to make the housing market affordable to new homebuyers. In addition, sustained strong international immigration will boost overall population and lead to nearly 280,000 new households during the next four years, providing a solid foundation for ongoing housing market activity. While the housing market is expected to remain healthy, it will likely continue to moderate from recent highs. Housing starts are expected to ease to 68,000 units in 2007 and 67,000 units in 2008, and then improve to 68,000 units in 2009. The number of home resales is expected to fall by 2.7 per cent in 2007 and a further 3.5 per cent in 2008 and then rebound by 4.0 per cent in 2009.
Softer demand has contributed to more moderate house price gains. The average resale price of a home in Ontario rose by 5.9 per cent in 2006, compared with an average increase of 7.7 per cent in the previous two years. Resale prices are expected to increase by 3.0 per cent in 2007 and by an average of 2.7 per cent in 2008 and 2009.

Increased investment in Ontario creates better jobs, leading to stronger productivity and higher living standards. The government’s strategic investments in a well-educated and highly skilled population; a high-quality health care system; reliable, modern infrastructure; and key sectors have created a strong competitive environment that attracts investment. The government is also proposing to improve Ontario’s already competitive tax environment as outlined in Chapter III: Ontario’s Tax System Supports Expanded Prosperity. Business investment is expected to lead growth, reflecting the positive investment climate. Business balance sheets remain very healthy, as the Canadian debt-to-equity ratio continues to fall and the interest coverage ratio, which measures the earnings available to cover interest expenses, remains high — reflecting low interest rates and manageable debt levels.

Last year was another solid year for business investment. Spending on machinery and equipment remained robust, with estimated real growth of 8.3 per cent in 2006. At the same time, investment in commercial and industrial construction improved significantly, growing by an estimated 7.4 per cent.
Investment in machinery and equipment is an important source of productivity growth, as it often embodies technological advances. Real investment in machinery and equipment is projected to rise by a solid 6.5 per cent in 2007 and by an average of 5.5 per cent per year in 2008 and 2009.
Commercial and industrial construction will also continue to grow, reflecting strong growth in utilities, transportation and warehousing, retail trade and finance, insurance and real estate. Outlays are projected to advance an average of 2.5 per cent a year from 2007 to 2009.
Corporate profits declined by 0.2 per cent in 2006, largely reflecting the weakness in the manufacturing sector and the negative impact of the rising dollar. Profits as a share of GDP were 11.6 per cent in 2006, well above the historical average of 9.9 per cent. Corporate profits are projected to increase by 1.1 per cent in 2007 and improve in 2008 and 2009, rising by an average 2.5 per cent. Forecasting corporate profits is particularly challenging given their year-to-year volatility. For planning purposes, the Ministry of Finance is projecting very modest and prudent increases in corporate profits, based largely on private-sector forecasts of the ratio of profits to nominal GDP. The resulting projections of corporate profits are quite prudent compared to the strong profit growth experienced in Ontario in recent comparable periods of strengthening economic growth.
This table shows the key details of the updated economic outlook for the 2007 to 2009 period.
| Actual | Projected | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |
| Real Gross Domestic Product | 2.8 | 1.3e | 1.6 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| Personal consumption | 3.7 | 4.0e | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| Residential construction | 1.8 | 0.3e | (3.0) | 0.9 | 2.5 |
| Non-residential construction | (0.8) | 7.4e | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.3 |
| Machinery and equipment | 11.1 | 8.3e | 6.5 | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| Exports | 1.7 | 0.2e | 1.5 | 3.3 | 3.8 |
| Imports | 4.1 | 5.0e | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
| Nominal Gross Domestic Product | 3.9 | 2.9e | 3.1 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Other Economic Indicators | |||||
| Retail sales | 4.7 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Housing starts (000s) | 78.8 | 73.4 | 68.0 | 67.0 | 68.0 |
| Personal income | 4.5 | 4.6e | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.9 |
| Wages and salaries 1 | 4.8 | 4.2e | 3.9 | 4.8 | 4.9 |
| Corporate profits | (1.7) | (0.2)e | 1.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| Consumer Price Index | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Labour Market | |||||
| Employment | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Job creation (000s) | 81 | 95 | 71 | 90 | 109 |
| Unemployment rate (per cent) | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| 1 Includes supplementary labour income. e = estimate. Sources: Statistics Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
|||||
In 2006, Ontario’s economy grew more slowly than anticipated at the time of the 2006 Budget, largely due to higher crude oil prices, a stronger Canadian dollar and weaker U.S. demand for autos and parts and forestry sector products. Real GDP rose by an estimated 1.3 per cent in 2006, with exports, wages and salaries, and corporate profits lower than projected at the time of the 2006 Budget. However, there were a number of positive developments. Machinery and equipment investment grew by an estimated 8.3 per cent — 0.4 percentage points above the 2006 Budget projection. Non-residential construction investment rose by an estimated 7.4 per cent — 1.5 percentage points higher than the 2006 Budget forecast. The labour market was also strong, with the economy creating 95,000 jobs in 2006 — 10,000 more than forecast at the time of the Budget. Consumer spending increased by a healthy 4.0 per cent in 2006 — 1.2 percentage points higher than the Budget projection. Residential investment grew by an estimated 0.3 per cent in 2006, a better outcome than expected, as home resales were stronger than forecast.
Current forecasts suggest weaker economic growth in the province in 2007 than projected at the time of 2006 Budget, reflecting ongoing restructuring in the auto sector, weaker U.S. growth and higher oil prices. Real GDP growth in 2007 is now projected to be 0.9 percentage points lower than expected at the time of the 2006 Budget. Nominal GDP growth is forecast to be 1.2 percentage points lower in 2007, and growth in the key revenue drivers, such as wages and salaries, corporate profits and retail sales, are all projected to be lower than expected in the 2006 Budget. The following table highlights the changes in forecast assumptions in the 2007 Budget compared with the 2006 Budget projections.
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Budget |
Actual | 2006 Budget |
2007 Budget |
2006 Budget |
2007 Budget |
|
| Real Gross Domestic Product | 2.3 | 1.3e | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| Nominal Gross Domestic Product | 4.5 | 2.9e | 4.3 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Retail Sales | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Housing Starts (000s) | 73.5 | 73.4 | 74.5 | 68.0 | 75.5 | 67.0 |
| Personal Income | 4.7 | 4.6e | 4.8 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 4.7 |
| Wages and Salaries 1 | 4.7 | 4.2e | 4.7 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Corporate Profits | 3.8 | (0.2)e | 4.3 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 2.4 |
| Employment | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| Job Creation (000s) | 85 | 95 | 97 | 71 | 112 | 90 |
| Key External Variables | ||||||
| Crude Oil ($ US per Barrel) | 61.0 | 66.1 | 57.0 | 61.0 | 52.0 | 61.0 |
| U.S. Real Gross Domestic Product | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Canadian Dollar (Cents US) | 87.0 | 88.2 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 87.0 | 87.5 |
| 3-month Treasury Bill Rate | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| 10-year Government Bond Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 4.7 |
| 1 Includes supplementary labour income. e = estimate. Sources: Statistics Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Bank of Canada, New York Mercantile Exchange, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Blue Chip Economic Indicators and Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
||||||
Ontario’s revenue outlook is based on the economic outlook presented in Section C: Ontario’s Economic Outlook, which calls for strengthening economic growth over the 2007 to 2009 period.
Total revenue is forecast at $91.5 billion in 2007–08, an increase of $2.4 billion or 2.6 per cent over the previous year. By 2009–10, total revenue is projected to reach $97.8 billion, an increase of $6.3 billion over the 2007–08 forecast, representing annual average growth of 3.4 per cent.
| Interim | Plan | Outlook | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 |
| Taxation Revenue | ||||
| Personal Income Tax | 23.3 | 23.3 | 24.7 | 26.4 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 16.2 | 16.7 | 17.5 | 18.4 |
| Corporations Tax | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Ontario Health Premium | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| All Other Taxes | 10.9 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Total Taxation Revenue | 63.5 | 64.3 | 67.2 | 70.1 |
| Government of Canada | 14.2 | 16.1 | 15.8 | 15.9 |
| Income from Government Enterprises | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | 7.5 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Total Revenue | 89.1 | 91.5 | 94.7 | 97.8 |
| Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. | ||||
The Personal Income Tax (PIT) revenue forecast is consistent with the economic outlook for rising employment and incomes. One-time revenues of $1.1 billion related to underestimating revenues in prior years’ Public Accounts included in 2006–07 mask growth in the tax base in 2007–08. The medium-term revenue forecast incorporates the projected impact of a number of tax measures announced previously and in this Budget by the Ontario Government. It also includes the estimated impact of paralleling measures announced by the federal government related to pension income splitting. The PIT revenue base tends to grow at a faster rate than incomes due to the progressive nature of the tax system.
| Interim | Plan | Outlook | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |
| Actual Revenue | 23.3 | 23.3 | 24.7 | 26.4 |
| Measures Included Above | – | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.2) |
| Adjustments for Prior Year Revenues | 1.1 | – | – | – |
| Base Revenue | 22.3 | 23.5 | 25.0 | 26.7 |
| Base Revenue Growth (Per Cent) | – | 5.4 | 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Wages and Salaries Growth (Per Cent) | – | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.9 |
| Notes: Numbers may not add due to rounding. "Measures included above" is the incremental revenue impact of all tax measures, announced previously and in this Budget, relative to their impact on revenues in 2006–07. Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
||||
Retail Sales Tax (RST) revenue growth is based on the forecast for increased household and business spending. RST revenue growth is dampened in 2007–08 by the outlook for residential investment spending and consumer durable goods expenditures. Revenue growth is expected to pick up in 2008–09 and 2009–10, consistent with the outlook for strengthening economic growth.
Corporations Tax (CT) revenue growth is based on the medium-term forecast for pre-tax corporate profits. CT revenue growth is affected by a number of tax measures announced in this and previous Ontario Budgets, most significantly the phasing out of the capital tax and the anticipated impact of the federal–provincial agreement to streamline the administration of Ontario’s corporate tax system. For more information on Ontario’s tax policy changes, see Chapter III, Ontario’s Tax System Supports Expanded Prosperity. The 2006–07 CT revenue projection includes a negative one-time adjustment of $114 million due to overestimation of 2005–06 revenues in the Public Accounts. The CT revenue base tends to grow more slowly than profits due to the flexibility corporations have in claiming certain income tax deductions and generally slow growth in the capital tax base.
| Interim | Plan | Outlook | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |
| Actual Revenue | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Measures Included Above | – | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.6) |
| Adjustments for Prior Year Revenues | (0.1) | – | – | – |
| Base Revenue | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 11.2 |
| Base Revenue Growth (Per Cent) | – | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Profit Growth (Per Cent) | – | 1.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| Notes: Numbers may not add due to rounding. "Measures included above" is the incremental revenue impact of all tax measures, announced previously and in this Budget, relative to their impact on revenues in 2006–07. Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
||||
The Ontario Health Premium forecast is consistent with the outlook for rising employment and incomes.
The forecast for growth in all other taxes is based on the outlook for economic growth outlined in Section C: Ontario’s Economic Outlook. The forecast is developed on an item-by-item basis. For example, the forecast for Employer Health Tax revenues is based on the outlook for wages and salaries growth.
Total taxation revenue is forecast to increase by $0.8 billion, or 1.3 per cent, in 2007–08. Between 2007–08 and 2009–10, taxation revenues are projected to increase by $5.8 billion, with annual growth averaging 4.4 per cent. This is roughly consistent with nominal GDP annual growth averaging 4.7 per cent between 2007 and 2009.
Transfers from the Government of Canada are based on existing federal–provincial funding arrangements and the Province’s understanding of new funding commitments made by the federal government, including proceeds from the C-48 trusts and the clean air and climate change trust, other Canada–Ontario Agreement equivalent amounts, and increases to the Canada Social Transfer due to the movement to equal per-capita provincial cash entitlements.
Income from Government Enterprises is based on information provided by Ontario’s government enterprises. The forecast is projected to remain flat at $4.0 billion from 2006–07 to 2007–08, with higher Liquor Control Board of Ontario and Hydro One Inc. (HOI) net income offset by slight declines in net income from the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) and Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG). The small decrease in OLG net income in 2007–08 is largely due to continued border issues, the value of the Canadian dollar, construction disruptions at Casino Windsor and the full-year impact of province-wide non-smoking legislation. The decline in OPG net income in 2007–08 is primarily due to lower projected electricity prices and increased pension and other post-employment costs, mainly due to changes in external factors that affect, for example, discount rates used to determine these costs. Net income from government enterprises is projected to increase to $4.5 billion in 2008–09 and 2009–10, with improved earnings among all the major government enterprises.
The forecast for Other Non-Tax revenues is based on information provided by government ministries and provincial agencies. These revenues are forecast to decrease by $0.4 billion, or 5.3 per cent, in 2007–08, largely due to the inclusion in 2006–07 of $573 million from the previously announced Teranet IPO on June 16, 2006. Other Non-Tax revenues increase by $0.2 billion, or on average 1.1 per cent a year, between 2007–08 and 2009–10 as a result of projected increases in a number of revenue sources, including reimbursements to the Province for services provided, power sales, and other fees and licences. Other Non-Tax Revenues tend to be primarily influenced by demographic factors, revenue policies and cyclical factors that affect some revenues such as royalties from Crown timber.
In the 2006 Ontario Budget, the Province included revenue of $2.2 billion in its medium-term fiscal plan between 2006–07 and 2008–09 from the Canada–Ontario Agreement (COA). In the Province’s current fiscal planning horizon, this amount would have been adjusted to $3.1 billion to include 2009–10.
While the federal government has made adjustments to the timing, nature, and purposes of its commitment to the COA, it is Ontario’s understanding that the federal government has committed to provide the Province with sufficient funding to meet its obligations (see Table 15). These one-time and ongoing revenues will primarily be used to fund existing projects and programs.
| 2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | 2009–10 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immigration | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Corporate Tax Collection | – | 400 | – | – | 400 |
| C-48 Trusts | 428 | 430 | 196 | – | 1,054 |
| Federal Trust for Clean Air and Climate Change | – | 195 | 195 | 196 | 586 |
| Other Federal Funding Commitments | – | 577 | 510 | 504 | 1,591 |
| Total COA Equivalent Revenue Included in the Fiscal Plan | 430 | 1,604 | 903 | 702 | 3,639 |
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
Outlook 2008–09 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Key Revenue Changes Since 2006 Ontario Budget | |||
| Slower Economic Growth | (0.7) | (1.5) | (1.7) |
| 2006–07 Revenue Experience | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Prior-Year Tax Return Processing | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Tax Policy Changes | (0.1) | (0.2) | (0.3) |
| Federal Transfers | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| Electricity-Related Revenues | (0.4) | (0.3) | 0.1 |
| Other | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Total Revenue Changes | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
|||
The medium-term forecast for total revenues has increased in each year since the 2006 Budget. The major changes are outlined below.
Changes in the economic growth outlook compared to the 2006 Budget result in lower projected taxation revenues over the medium term. For further details, see Section C: Ontario’s Economic Outlook.
Stronger-than-projected tax revenue performance during 2006–07, particularly from Corporations Tax, boosts the base upon which forecast growth is applied. For further details, see Section B: Interim Fiscal Performance.
Higher revenues from processing of 2005 and prior-year Personal Income Tax returns during 2006 and higher-than-projected Corporations Tax revenues related to 2005–06 result in substantial one-time revenues in 2006–07 and also boost the base upon which forecast growth is applied, increasing taxation revenues throughout the forecast period.
Tax policy changes since the 2006 Budget lower the taxation revenue outlook by $0.1 billion in 2006–07 and by $0.3 billion by 2008–09. These include Ontario’s paralleling of tax policy measures announced in the 2006 federal budget; the enhanced Ontario dividend tax credit announced in August 2006; the estimated impact of the federal–provincial agreement to streamline the administration of Ontario’s corporate tax system; and the estimated impact of federal measures announced on October 31, 2006 with respect to pension income splitting. For more information on proposed Ontario taxation changes, see Chapter III, Ontario’s Tax System Supports Expanded Prosperity.
Government of Canada Transfers are higher each year over the medium term than projected in the 2006 Budget. The outlook reflects existing federal–provincial funding arrangements and the Province’s understanding of new funding commitments made by the federal government.
The decrease in electricity sector-related revenues in 2006–07 relative to the 2006 Budget is largely due to lower-than-projected electricity demand and prices. The 2007–08 decrease is primarily due to lower projected power sales by the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation (OEFC) from contracts with non-utility generators (NUGs). The impact of lower power sales is fiscally neutral, being fully offset by lower OEFC power purchases from NUGs, and is due to improved methods for projecting power sales and purchases by OEFC. In 2008–09, lower power sales than projected in the 2006 Budget is also fully offset by lower power purchases from NUGs, and more than offset by the higher combined net income of OPG and HOI and projected higher payments-in-lieu of taxes from the electricity sector.
Other revenue changes since the 2006 Budget outlook include higher revenues over the medium term from other non-tax revenue sources, including reimbursements to the Province for services provided, other fees, licences and permits, and miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues in 2006–07 are boosted by $573 million in one-time revenue from the previously announced Teranet IPO of June 16, 2006.
A growing economy with rising incomes, corporate profits and consumer spending generates higher revenues to pay for public services. Taxation revenues make up the largest category of Provincial revenue. Of the $91.5 billion in total revenues forecast for 2007–08, $64.3 billion, or about 70 per cent, is expected to come from taxation revenues. Three taxes within this category — Personal Income Tax, Retail Sales Tax and Corporations Tax — account for about 55 per cent of total revenues. Inherent in any multi-year forecast is uncertainty about the future, making cautious and prudent planning a critical element of managing public finances.
This section highlights some of the key sensitivities and risks to the fiscal plan that could follow from unexpected changes in economic conditions. It should be cautioned that these estimates, while useful, are only guidelines and can vary depending on the composition and interaction of the potential risks. These selected risks are those that could potentially have the most material impact on the largest revenue sources. There is a broader range of potential additional risks that are not included because either they are not as material or are difficult to quantify. For example, Income from Government Enterprises, representing roughly five per cent of total revenues, could be affected by a wide range of complex and potentially inter-related economic, market, cost, regulatory and policy developments affecting the enterprises. Likewise, federal transfer payments are subject to future negotiations and legislation, with risks that are difficult to quantify.
| Item/Key Components | 2007–08 Assumption | 2007–08 Sensitivities |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenues | ||
| – Real GDP | 1.6 per cent growth in 2007 | $670 million revenue change for each percentage point change in real GDP growth. Can vary significantly, depending on composition and source of changes in GDP growth. |
| – GDP Deflator | 1.5 per cent increase in 2007 | |
| – Canadian Interest Rates | 4.1 per cent three-month treasury bill rate in 2007 | Between $70 million and $345 million revenue change in the opposite direction for each percentage point change in interest rates. |
| – U.S. Real GDP | 2.7 per cent growth in 2007 | Between $205 million and $480 million revenue change for each percentage point change in U.S. real GDP growth. |
| – Canadian Dollar Exchange Rate | 86.0 cents US in 2007 | Between $25 million and $125 million revenue change in the opposite direction for each one cent change in the Canadian dollar exchange rate. |
| Total Taxation Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base 1 | 3.1 per cent growth in 2007–08 | $565 million revenue change for each percentage point change in nominal GDP growth. Can vary significantly, depending on composition and source of changes in GDP growth. |
| – Nominal GDP | 3.1 per cent growth in 2007 | |
| Personal Income Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 5.4 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| Key Economic Assumptions | ||
| – Wages and Salaries | 3.9 per cent growth in 2007 | $285 million revenue change for each percentage point change in wages and salaries growth. |
| – Employment | 1.1 per cent growth in 2007 | |
| – Unincorporated Business Income | 3.8 per cent growth in 2007 | |
| Key Revenue Assumptions | ||
| – Net Capital Gains Income | 6.2 per cent increase in 2007 | $10 million revenue change for each percentage point change in net capital gains income growth. |
| – RRSP Deductions | 3.9 per cent growth in 2007 | $16 million revenue change in the opposite direction for each percentage point change in RRSP deductions growth. |
| – 2006 Tax-Year Assessments 2 | $20.6 billion | $206 million revenue change for each percentage point change in 2006 Personal Income Tax assessments. 3 |
| – 2005 Tax-Year and Prior Assessments 2 | $1.1 billion | $11 million revenue change for each percentage point change in 2005 and prior Personal Income Tax assessments. 3 |
| Retail Sales Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 2.7 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| Includes: | ||
| – Taxable Household Spending | 2.3 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| – Other Taxable Spending | 3.1 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| Key Economic Assumptions | ||
| – Retail Sales | 3.6 per cent growth in 2007 | |
| – Nominal Consumption Expenditure | 3.5 per cent growth in 2007 | $110 million revenue change for each percentage point change in nominal consumption expenditure growth. |
| Corporations Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 1.3 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| – Corporate Profits | 1.1 per cent growth in 2007 | $60 million revenue change for each percentage point change in pre-tax corporate profit growth. |
| – 2006–07 Tax Assessment Refunds 4 | $1.5 billion payable in 2007–08 | $15 million revenue change in the opposite direction for each percentage point change in 2005–06 refunds. 3 |
| – 2006–07 Tax Payments upon Filing | $0.8 billion receivable in 2007–08 | $8 million revenue change for each percentage point change in 2006–07 payments upon filing. 3 |
| – 2006–07 Tax Assessment Payments | $0.7 billion receivable in 2006–07 and 2007–08 | $7 million revenue change for each percentage point change in 2006–07 assessment payments. 3 |
| Employer Health Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 3.6 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| – Wages and Salaries | 3.9 per cent growth in 2007 | $40 million revenue change for each percentage point change in wages and salaries growth. |
| Ontario Health Premium Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 3.6 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| – Personal Income | 3.9 per cent growth in 2007 | $24 million revenue change for each percentage point change in personal income growth. |
| – 2006 Tax-Year Assessments | $2.4 billion in 2006 | $24 million revenue change for each percentage point change in 2006 Ontario Health Premium Assessments. |
| Gasoline Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 2.2 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| – Gasoline Pump Prices | 87.8 cents per litre in 2007 | $6 million revenue decrease for each cent per litre increase in gasoline pump prices. |
| Fuel Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 0.5 per cent growth in 2007–08 | |
| – Real GDP | 1.6 per cent growth in 2007 | $6 million revenue change for each percentage point change in real GDP growth. |
| Land Transfer Tax Revenues | ||
| – Revenue Base | 1.8 per cent decline in 2007–08 | |
| – Housing Resales | 2.7 per cent decline in 2007 | $14 million revenue change for each percentage point change in both the number and prices of housing resales. |
| – Resale Prices | 3.0 per cent growth in 2007 | |
| Health and Social Transfers | ||
| – Canada-wide Revenue Base | $30.1 billion in 2007–08 | |
| – Ontario Revenue Share | 37.8 per cent in 2007–08 | |
| – Ontario Population Share | 38.9 per cent in 2007–08 | $45 million revenue change for each tenth of a percentage point change in population share. |
| – Ontario Basic Federal PIT Share | 43.4 per cent in 2007–08 | $12 million revenue change in the opposite direction for each tenth of a percentage point change in Basic Federal Personal Income Tax base share. |
| Other Federal Transfers | ||
| – Ontario’s understanding of increases to federal transfers resulting from the 2007 federal Budget | New funding commitments made by the federal government include proceeds from the federal trust for clean air and climate change, Canada-Ontario Agreement equivalent amounts, and increases to the Canada Social Transfer. | The status of this increase in transfers will be uncertain should the federal government not secure the necessary legislative approvals. |
| 1 Revenue base is revenue excluding the impact of measures, adjustments for past Public Accounts estimate variances and other one-time factors. 2 Ontario 2006 Personal Income Tax (PIT) is a forecast estimate because most 2006 tax returns are yet to be assessed by the Canada Revenue Agency. Some tax amounts for 2005 and prior years are also yet to be assessed during 2007, and estimates of these amounts are also included in the revenue outlook. 3 Any change in 2006 or prior-year PIT assessments or 2006–07 Corporations Tax revenues will have an effect on 2007–08 revenues through a change in the revenue base upon which this year’s growth is applied. 4 Corporations Tax revenues for 2006–07 are still subject to uncertainty because a high proportion of corporations have until June 30, 2007 to file their 2006 tax returns and much of the activity that arises from that (refunds, assessment payments) will occur during the latter half of 2007. |
||
The government is committed to continuing the prudent and disciplined approach to fiscal planning that is projected to achieve a second consecutive surplus of $0.3 billion in 2006–07. The Province’s medium-term fiscal outlook, which includes reserves of $0.8 billion in 2007–08, $1.0 billion in 2008–09 and $1.3 billion in 2009–10, projects a small deficit of $0.4 billion in 2007–08, and surpluses of $0.3 billion in 2008–09 and $0.4 billion in 2009–10. The Province is on track to post a surplus of $0.4 billion in 2007–08 if the reserve is not required. This considerable improvement in the Province’s fiscal position means that, if the reserve is not required in 2007–08, the Province is on track to post five consecutive surpluses between 2005–06 and 2009–10.
The following table provides details of the Province’s fiscal outlook for the fiscal years 2006–07 to 2009–10. Further details are included in Section G: Details of Ontario’s Finances.
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
Outlook | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |||
| Total Revenue | 89.1 | 91.5 | 94.7 | 97.8 |
| Expense | ||||
| Programs | ||||
| Health Sector | 36.1 | 37.9 | 39.8 | 41.5 |
| Education Sector 1 | 11.7 | 12.4 | 12.8 | 12.9 |
| Postsecondary Education and Training Sector | 5.4 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 6.1 |
| Children’s and Social Services Sector | 10.5 | 10.9 | 11.2 | 11.3 |
| Justice Sector | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Other Programs | 12.9 | 11.6 | 11.2 | 11.6 |
| Total Programs | 80.0 | 82.0 | 84.2 | 86.8 |
| Interest on Debt | 8.8 | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Total Expense | 88.8 | 91.2 | 93.4 | 96.2 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) Before Reserve | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Reserve | – | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | 0.3 | (0.4) | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| 1 Education sector excludes Teachers’ Pension Plan (TPP). Including TPP, total education sector expense is projected at $12.1 billion in 2006–07, $12.8 billion in 2007–08, $12.8 billion in 2008–09 and $12.6 billion in 2009–10. Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
||||
The Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act, 2004 sets out a number of criteria that the Province’s fiscal plan must meet. These criteria ensure the highest level of transparency and accountability in fiscal planning and reporting.
The act requires the Ontario Government to plan for balanced budgets. The key elements of the government’s fiscal plan that will ensure the achievement of ongoing balanced budgets include:
The medium-term expense outlook reflects the new investments announced in this Budget, as well as those made in the last three budgets, mainly in priority areas such as health, education, postsecondary education and training, infrastructure, and programs for the vulnerable.
The medium-term expense outlook continues to maintain the government’s commitment to align growth in expense with revenue growth. Over the medium term, total expense will rise from $91.2 billion in 2007–08 to $96.2 billion in 2009–10 — an increase of $5.0 billion. Annual growth in total expense is expected to average 2.7 per cent over the medium term, which is less than the 3.4 per cent average annual growth in revenue forecast over this period.
Making disciplined decisions aimed at controlling the rate of growth in the Province’s medium-term expense plan is a key element of the Province’s fiscal plan. However, a number of expense risks and cost drivers could affect the Province’s ability to achieve its fiscal targets over the medium term.
Key cost drivers within the Province’s expense outlook are demand-driven programs and services that arise from changes in the economic outlook or utilization rates. These pressures are especially evident in the health and social services sectors. For example, a one per cent increase in both Ontario Works and Ontario Disability Support Program caseloads would cost the Province an additional $42 million a year.
Given the size of the health sector, demand for health services can present a significant risk to the fiscal plan. Between 2003–04 and 2006–07, Ontario’s total health spending increased at an average annual rate of 7.1 per cent. By contrast, Ontario’s nominal GDP growth averaged 3.9 per cent annually, and total revenue growth averaged 9.2 per cent annually during this period. In 2007–08, the government is planning to invest an additional $1.8 billion in Ontario’s health sector for a total of $37.9 billion, representing an annual increase of 5.0 per cent over 2006–07, much higher than the 2.6 per cent growth projected for total Provincial revenue. With this increase, total health spending will amount to 46 per cent of total Provincial program expense in 2007–08.
Perpetual growth in health spending at a rate that exceeds growth in revenue may, over time, reduce funding available for other programs, services and investments, ultimately threatening the long-term economic growth potential of the province. This Budget provides additional targeted investments in the health sector, to support a strategy to lower the rate of growth in health spending over the medium term. In particular, the government is making investments to put the hospital sector on a sustainable financial footing, empowering Local Health Integration Networks, expanding the use of e-health technology and ensuring value for money in the drug system.
To protect the fiscal plan against these types of risks, prudence is built into the plan. The degree of fiscal prudence, currently contained in the medium-term plan, is discussed later in this section.
As required by the Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act, 2004, the following highlights some of the key sensitivities and risks to the fiscal plan that could follow from unexpected changes in economic conditions and program demands. It should be cautioned that these sensitivities and risks are only guidelines and can vary, depending on the nature and composition of potential risks.
Many programs delivered by the Province are subject to potential risks and cost drivers, such as utilization growth or enrollment and caseload changes. The following sensitivities are guidelines only, and are based on averages for program areas that could change depending on the nature and composition of the potential risk.
| Program/Sector | 2007–08 Assumption | 2007–08 Sensitivities |
|---|---|---|
| Health Sector | Annual growth of 5.0 per cent. | One per cent change in health spending: $379 million. |
| Hospitals Net Expense | Annual growth of 5.0 per cent. | One per cent change in hospital net expense: $175 million. |
| Drug Programs | Annual growth of 9.0 per cent. | One per cent change in utilization of all drug programs: $39 million (seniors and social assistance recipients). |
| Long-Term Care Homes | 75,500 long-term care home beds. | One per cent change in number of beds: approximately $28 million. |
| Annual average Provincial operating cost per bed, after resident co-payment revenue, in a long-term care home is $38,000. | ||
| Home Care | Over 17 million hours of homemaking and support services; 9 million nursing and professional visits. | One per cent change in hours of homemaking and support services: $4 million. One per cent change in nursing and professional visits: $6 million. |
| Elementary and Secondary Schools 1 | Almost 2 million average daily pupil enrolment. | One per cent enrolment increase: $160 million school boards’ net expense. |
| University Students 1 | 322,000 full-time undergraduate and graduate students. | One per cent enrolment change: $28 million of net expense. |
| Ontario Works 1 | 199,000 average annual caseload. | One per cent caseload change: $17 million. |
| Ontario Disability Support Program 1 | 212,000 average annual caseload. | One per cent caseload change: $25 million. |
| College Students | 151,000 full-time students. | One per cent enrolment change: $7 million. |
| Interest on Debt | Average cost of 2007–08 borrowing is forecast to be approximately 4.9 per cent. | The 2007–08 impact of a 100 basis-point change in borrowing rates is forecast to be approximately $250 million. |
| Correctional System | 3.0 million adult inmate days per year. Average cost $160 per inmate per day. | One per cent change in inmate days: $5 million. |
| 1 Based on 2006–07. | ||
Compensation costs and wage settlements are key cost drivers and have a substantial impact on the finances of both the broader public-sector partners and the Province.
| Sector | Cost of 1% Salary Increase | Size of Sector |
| OHIP Payments to Physicians | $82 million | Almost 22,000 physicians in Ontario, comprising 10,900 family doctors and 11,000 specialists. |
| Hospital Nurses 1 | $45 million | Over 54,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) nurses in hospitals. |
| Elementary and Secondary School Staff 2 | $140 million | Over 195,000 staff including teachers, principals, administrators, and support and maintenance staff. |
| College Staff 3 | $12 million | About 35,000 staff including faculty, administrators, and support and maintenance staff. |
| Ontario Public Service 4 | $52 million | Over 64,000 public servants. |
| 1 Based on 2006–07. 2 One per cent increase in salary benchmarks in Grants for Student Needs based on 2006–07 school year. 3 Based on 2005–06. 4 Based on 2005–06, reflects total compensation costs. |
||
In addition to applying a disciplined approach to fiscal planning while making strategic investments in key priority areas, the government’s medium-term fiscal plan includes prudence in recognition of the risks that could materialize due to unanticipated changes in Ontario’s economic outlook or in Provincial revenue and expense.
The government’s medium-term fiscal plan includes reserves of $0.8 billion in 2007–08, $1.0 billion in 2008–09 and $1.3 billion in 2009–10. The purpose of the reserve is to protect the government’s overall fiscal objectives and ensure the achievement of the fiscal targets outlined in this Budget. The 2008–09 and 2009–10 reserves are higher than the $0.8 billion reserve included in 2007–08 to better reflect the risks and uncertain nature of medium-term revenue and expense projections.

A key component of the government’s medium-term fiscal plan is the commitment to maintain a prudent level of Provincial debt relative to the size of Ontario’s economy as measured by nominal GDP. Ongoing debt accumulation can significantly limit the extent to which vital public services can be funded, as increasing debt charges crowd out funds available for spending on government priorities. Responsible fiscal management, therefore, needs to be long term to ensure that future generations are not faced with the erosion of key programs and services because of high deficits today.
Consistent with the Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act, 2004, Provincial debt is defined as accumulated deficit, which is the sum of all past Provincial surpluses and deficits. The expansion of the Province’s financial reporting to include hospitals, school boards and colleges also means that, beginning in 2005–06, the surpluses or deficits of these organizations are now reflected in the Province’s debt-to-GDP ratio.
In line with the improvements in the medium-term fiscal outlook, the Province’s debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to improve from 25.2 per cent in 2003–04 to 17.4 per cent by 2009–10.
Table 21 provides an overview of key changes to the Province’s medium-term fiscal outlook since the release of the 2006 Budget.
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
Outlook 2008–09 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Surplus/(Deficit) as per 2006 Budget | (2.4) | (1.5) | 0.0 |
| Total Revenue Changes Since 2006 Budget | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| Key Expense Changes Since 2006 Budget: | |||
| Transit and Roads | 0.8 | – | – |
| Additional Health Sector Investments | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Increased Spending on Children’s and Social Services | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Increased Education Funding | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Support for Municipalities and Housing | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Funding to Municipalities (OMPF) | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Enhanced Support for Agriculture, Rural and Resources Sector | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Justice Sector Funding | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Interest on Debt Savings | (0.6) | (0.5) | (0.7) |
| Other Expense Changes | 0.1 | (0.3) | (0.6) |
| Total Expense Changes 1 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Change in Reserve | (1.0) | (0.8) | (0.5) |
| Total Changes Since 2006 Budget | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| 2007 Budget Surplus/(Deficit) | 0.3 | (0.4) | 0.3 |
| Reserve | – | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 2007 Budget Surplus/(Deficit) Before Reserve | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 |
| 1 Excludes the impact of adjustments made in the 2007 Budget to reflect transfers from various ministries to school boards, hospitals and colleges. Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance. |
|||
While the 2006 Budget outlined a medium-term fiscal plan to balance the budget by 2008–09, or one year earlier if the reserve was not required in 2007–08, this Budget reports that the government is projecting that the Province is now on track to post five consecutive surpluses between 2005–06 to 2009–10 if the reserve is not required in 2007–08.
The medium-term forecast for total revenues has increased since the 2006 Budget largely due to higher-than-projected federal transfers and a higher-than-projected 2006–07 taxation revenue base upon which forecast growth is applied. Additional details on changes to medium-term revenue forecast are found in Section D: Ontario’s Revenue Outlook.
The following are key changes to the medium-term expense outlook since the 2006 Budget:
The government is committed to enhancing transparency, accountability and financial management in the public sector. It has already taken a number of important steps to this end and is further strengthening accountability for the spending of taxpayer dollars.
Shortly after taking office, the government introduced the Fiscal Transparency and Accountability Act (OMPF), which became law in December 2004.
Under OMPF, the Province is now required to release:
Under OMPF, the Province is also required to:
The government also took major steps towards improving the timeliness of the Province’s financial reporting by advancing the dates of its Budgets and Annual Reports. The 2006 and 2007 Budgets have been tabled in advance of the start of the Province’s fiscal year. The earlier budgets give transfer payment partners more timely information to better plan their delivery of services to the public. The government also advanced the date of tabling its 2005–06 Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements compared to prior years and plans to maintain this schedule for its 2006–07 Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements. By providing more comprehensive and timely financial reporting, the government is demonstrating its commitment to improved transparency in government financial reporting.
Every year, the Minister of Finance has appeared before the all-party Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs, where members of the legislature can ask questions about the Province’s fiscal position. The Minister also conducts his own province-wide pre-budget consultations. Between November 2006 and January 2007, the Minister met 928 stakeholders in 14 communities throughout Ontario.
Recognizing that the public wants governments to be held accountable for the effective management of tax dollars, the Province has introduced new initiatives that will strengthen public accountability.
As required by OMPF, the government will issue its first Pre-Election Report in April 2007. The Pre-Election Report will help Ontario’s citizens better understand the Province’s finances before the upcoming provincial election. The Report will be reviewed by the Auditor General of Ontario, and the results of the review are expected to be reported by June 2007.
The Election Act was amended so that, starting in 2007, provincial general elections will normally be held on the first Thursday in October every four years. By establishing fixed dates for general elections, the government has enhanced openness and transparency in the elections process. The government will propose amendments to the Election Act to reflect the change in the date of the general election to Wednesday, October 10, 2007. This change, as permitted by the Election Act, was ordered by the Lieutenant Governor in Council upon the recommendation of the Chief Election Officer. In addition to some technical amendments to the Election Finances Act and the Legislative Assembly Act, the government will propose amendments to lower the threshold requirements for registration as a political party under the act and ensure the integrity of the party registration and political finance system is maintained.
In this new era of fixed election dates, and continuing to build on the transparency and accountability that has been entrenched since 2003, this government intends to introduce legislation that, if enacted, would give the government legal spending authority from the beginning of the fiscal year, through the period of the general election. This system would be consistent with other jurisdictions and would allow the legislature to approve government spending — a more transparent method than used in previous election years.
The government is committed to delivering quality French language services to Ontario’s francophone community. This Budget proposes legislative amendments to the French Language Services Act to establish the Office of the Commissioner of French Language Services as an agency of government. The Commissioner will act as a liaison between government and the francophone community in the delivery of French language services as set out in the act.
The government provides broader public-sector (BPS) organizations throughout the province with over $40 billion in transfer payments to deliver services to the public. Given the magnitude of the dollars entrusted to these organizations, the government has taken steps to improve their accountability for spending taxpayer dollars wisely by amending the Auditor General Act and expanding the government’s financial reporting to include major BPS expenses.
The Auditor General Act was amended in 2004 to expand the Auditor General’s authority to perform value-for-money audits of institutions in the BPS as well as Crown-controlled corporations and their subsidiaries. The Auditor General can now review the operations of these BPS organizations to help ensure that taxpayers are getting value for money.
Starting with the 2006 Budget, and the 2005–06 Public Accounts, the government expanded the scope of the Province’s financial reporting to include the financial results of three important public-sector partners: hospitals, school boards, and colleges of applied arts and technology. The inclusion of these broader public sectors in the government’s financial reports improves transparency in government financial reporting and enhances the accountability of these sectors for managing their expenditure of taxpayer dollars.
The government is also strengthening financial management in the public service. An increased focus on strong financial management processes will boost the government’s ability to deliver value to Ontario’s taxpayers.
As part of its initiatives, the government created the Treasury Board Office and restructured the Office of the Provincial Controller. The new Treasury Board Office will provide enterprise-wide leadership in fiscal and financial planning, while collaborating with ministries and agencies to support sound, timely decisions and delivery of the government’s priorities. The Office of the Provincial Controller will play a key role in strengthening financial management practices in the public service and ensuring the necessary financial systems, processes and controls are in place and operating efficiently and effectively.
Substantial system enhancements have already been made to support more effective financial management and reporting. The quality of the government’s external financial reports has been enhanced by the implementation of a common integrated financial information system (IFIS) throughout the public service. This system is being enhanced to improve financial management reporting and accounting for provincial assets, revenues and BPS expenditures.
The government is also making significant strides to promote efficiency and effectiveness in supply chain management for Ontario’s BPS through OntarioBuys. Additional details are provided in Chapter I, Section H: Expanding Opportunities through a Modern and Efficient Government.
As well, the government continues to improve its accounting and financial reporting practices. In recent years, the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (<acronym title="Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants">CICA</acronym>) has introduced a number of fundamental changes in government accounting standards. These changes have resulted in the expanded consolidation of BPS organizations and the amortization of tangible capital assets. The net expenses of these BPS organizations are now included in the Province’s financial statements on a bottom-line accountability basis. The government is consulting with PSAB to ensure that this “one-line” basis of reporting can be maintained in the future to support the improved transparency of these sectors for reporting their net expenses.
The PSAB is considering a number of other significant changes to government financial reporting, which include accounting for government transfers, financial instruments and foreign exchange. As with any potential change, it is important to consider their possible impact on the transparency and quality of government financial reporting, as well as on the fiscal planning and policy decision-making processes. The government will continue to work with PSAB and other stakeholder groups to ensure that accounting standards established for governments in Canada serve the best interests of Ontario’s taxpayers.
Finally, the Office of the Provincial Controller has worked with other provincial, territorial and federal government controllers to establish the Canadian Council of Comptrollers (CCC). This recently established council allows government controllers to work together on common issues and concerns. It also facilitates the sharing of best practices in government financial management and the exchange of information and experience among all the controllers of senior governments across Canada.
As outlined in this chapter, the Province has succeeded in eliminating the inherited structural deficit and, if the reserve is not required in 2007–08, is projecting five consecutive surpluses between 2005–06 and 2009–10.
This section provides information on Ontario’s historical fiscal performance, key fiscal indicators, as well as details on the Province’s medium-term fiscal plan and outlook:
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
Outlook | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008–09 | 2009–10 | |||
| Revenue | 89.1 | 91.5 | 94.7 | 97.8 |
| Expense | ||||
| Programs | 80.0 | 82.0 | 84.2 | 86.8 |
| Interest on Debt | 8.8 | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Total Expense | 88.8 | 91.2 | 93.4 | 96.2 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) Before Reserve | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Reserve | – | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | 0.3 | (0.4) | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Investment in Capital Assets | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Net Debt 1 | 143.0 | 145.3 | 147.0 | 149.2 |
| Accumulated Deficit 1 | 108.8 | 109.2 | 108.9 | 108.6 |
| Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at Market Prices | 553.2 | 570.3 | 597.2 | 625.2 |
| Net Debt as a per cent of GDP | 25.9 | 25.5 | 24.6 | 23.9 |
| Accumulated Deficit as a per cent of GDP | 19.7 | 19.2 | 18.2 | 17.4 |
| 1 Net Debt is calculated as the difference between liabilities and financial assets. The annual change in Net Debt is equal to the Surplus/Deficit of the Province plus the change in tangible capital assets and the change in net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges. Accumulated Deficit is calculated as the difference between liabilities and total assets including tangible capital assets and net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges. The annual change in the Accumulated Deficit is equal to the Surplus/Deficit. Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. |
||||
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Millions | Per Cent | |||
| Revenue | 89,143 | 91,503 | 2,360 | 2.6 |
| Expense | ||||
| Programs | 79,992 | 82,030 | 2,038 | 2.5 |
| Interest on Debt | 8,841 | 9,123 | 282 | 3.2 |
| Total Expense | 88,833 | 91,153 | 2,320 | 2.6 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) Before Reserve | 310 | 350 | 40 | 12.9 |
| Reserve | – | 750 | 750 | – |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | 310 | (400) | (710) | – |
| Investment in Capital Assets | 2,609 | 3,334 | 725 | 27.8 |
| Net Debt 1 | 143,025 | 145,314 | 2,289 | 1.6 |
| Accumulated Deficit 1 | 108,845 | 109,245 | 400 | 0.4 |
| 1 Net Debt is calculated as the difference between liabilities and financial assets. The annual change in Net Debt is equal to the Surplus/Deficit of the Province plus the change in tangible capital assets and the change in net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges. Accumulated Deficit is calculated as the difference between liabilities and total assets including tangible capital assets and net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges. The annual change in the Accumulated Deficit is equal to the Surplus/Deficit. | ||||
| 2003–04 | 2004–05 | Actual 2005–06 |
Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxation Revenue | |||||
| Personal Income Tax | 18,301 | 19,320 | 21,041 | 23,285 | 23,285 |
| Retail Sales Tax | 14,258 | 14,855 | 15,554 | 16,194 | 16,682 |
| Corporations Tax | 6,658 | 9,883 | 9,984 | 10,476 | 10,605 |
| Employer Health Tax | 3,753 | 3,886 | 4,197 | 4,376 | 4,550 |
| Ontario Health Premium | – | 1,737 | 2,350 | 2,589 | 2,638 |
| Gasoline Tax | 2,264 | 2,277 | 2,281 | 2,303 | 2,401 |
| Fuel Tax | 681 | 727 | 729 | 735 | 741 |
| Tobacco Tax | 1,350 | 1,453 | 1,379 | 1,268 | 1,217 |
| Land Transfer Tax | 909 | 1,043 | 1,159 | 1,203 | 1,187 |
| Electricity Payments-In-Lieu of Taxes | 627 | 511 | 951 | 706 | 706 |
| Other Taxes | 347 | 283 | 292 | 355 | 307 |
| 49,148 | 55,975 | 59,917 | 63,490 | 64,319 | |
| Government of Canada | |||||
| Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST) | 7,345 | – | – | – | – |
| Canada Health Transfer (CHT) | – | 5,640 | 7,148 | 7,732 | 8,104 |
| Canada Social Transfer (CST) 1 | – | 2,912 | 3,324 | 3,499 | 3,740 |
| CHST Supplements | 577 | 775 | 584 | – | – |
| Social Housing | 528 | 522 | 520 | 530 | 528 |
| Infrastructure Programs | 150 | 209 | 285 | 201 | 161 |
| Wait Times Reduction Fund | – | 242 | 243 | 467 | 468 |
| Medical Equipment Funds | 192 | 387 | 194 | – | – |
| Other Government of Canada | 1,101 | 1,195 | 953 | 1,749 | 3,105 |
| 9,893 | 11,882 | 13,251 | 14,178 | 16,106 | |
| Income from Investment in Government Business Enterprises | |||||
| Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation | 2,106 | 1,992 | 2,027 | 1,827 | 1,801 |
| Liquor Control Board of Ontario | 1,045 | 1,147 | 1,197 | 1,290 | 1,343 |
| Ontario Power Generation Inc. and Hydro One Inc. | (17) | 444 | 1,107 | 873 | 840 |
| Other Government Enterprises | (64) | (5) | (23) | (2) | 2 |
| 3,070 | 3,578 | 4,308 | 3,988 | 3,986 | |
| Other Non-Tax Revenue | |||||
| Reimbursements | 1,206 | 1,241 | 1,295 | 1,419 | 1,491 |
| Electricity Debt Retirement Charge | 1,000 | 997 | 1,021 | 1,000 | 1,013 |
| Vehicle and Driver Registration Fees | 985 | 976 | 763 | 1,021 | 1,032 |
| Power Sales | 510 | 610 | 779 | 807 | 831 |
| Other Fees and Licences | 594 | 506 | 550 | 565 | 583 |
| Liquor Licence Revenue | 488 | 489 | 516 | 458 | 455 |
| Net Reduction of Power Purchase Contract Liability | 104 | 236 | 396 | 412 | 398 |
| Sales and Rentals | 532 | 352 | 465 | 991 | 429 |
| Royalties | 248 | 278 | 191 | 222 | 217 |
| Miscellaneous Other Non-Tax Revenue | 622 | 721 | 773 | 592 | 643 |
| 6,289 | 6,406 | 6,749 | 7,487 | 7,092 | |
| Total Revenue | 68,400 | 77,841 | 84,225 | 89,143 | 91,503 |
| 1 Includes 2005 federal budget additional Early Learning and Child Care revenues of $272 million in 2005–06 and $254 million in 2006–07. | |||||
| Ministry Expense | 2003–04 | 2004–05 | Actual 1 2005–06 |
Interim 2 2006–07 |
Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007–08 | |||||
| Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat | 15 | 21 | 50 | 24 | 28 |
| Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs | 843 | 799 | 865 | 809 | 876 |
| Attorney General | 1,231 | 1,209 | 1,287 | 1,379 | 1,387 |
| Board of Internal Economy | 196 | 145 | 150 | 168 | 245 |
| Children and Youth Services 3 | 2,595 | 2,786 | 3,267 | 3,284 | 3,574 |
| Citizenship and Immigration 3 | 55 | 64 | 92 | 118 | 86 |
| Community and Social Services 3 | 5,976 | 6,365 | 6,718 | 7,238 | 7,341 |
| Community Safety and Correctional Services 3 | 1,701 | 1,739 | 1,750 | 1,895 | 1,927 |
| Culture | 327 | 344 | 475 | 400 | 350 |
| Democratic Renewal Secretariat | – | 2 | 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Economic Development and Trade | 78 | 68 | 176 | 268 | 327 |
| Education | 352 | 368 | 440 | 445 | 437 |
| School Boards Net Expense | 9,423 | 10,274 | 10,886 | 11,290 | 11,989 |
| Energy | 169 | 194 | 207 | 247 | 290 |
| Environment | 265 | 307 | 274 | 312 | 325 |
| Executive Offices | 24 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 18 |
| Finance 3 | 696 | 544 | 583 | 612 | 464 |
| Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund/Community Reinvestment Fund | 651 | 626 | 714 | 758 | 917 |
| Francophone Affairs, Office of | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Government Services | 467 | 898 | 625 | 817 | 818 |
| Health and Long-Term Care 4 | 16,233 | 17,573 | 17,841 | 19,033 | 20,043 |
| Hospitals Net Expense 4 | 12,946 | 13,877 | 14,816 | 16,674 | 17,509 |
| Health Promotion 3 | 202 | 236 | 290 | 396 | 373 |
| Intergovernmental Affairs | 6 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 9 |
| Labour | 117 | 129 | 141 | 150 | 161 |
| Municipal Affairs and Housing | 635 | 772 | 926 | 837 | 760 |
| Natural Resources | 627 | 563 | 628 | 762 | 726 |
| Northern Development and Mines | 189 | 320 | 337 | 322 | 356 |
| Public Infrastructure Renewal 5 | (35) | 41 | 107 | 403 | 138 |
| Research and Innovation 3 | 161 | 238 | 332 | 318 | 325 |
| Revenue | 533 | 523 | 442 | 551 | 578 |
| Small Business and Entrepreneurship | 11 | 16 | 26 | 25 | 26 |
| Tourism | 212 | 167 | 210 | 191 | 195 |
| Training, Colleges and Universities 3 | 2,811 | 3,293 | 3,504 | 4,095 | 4,402 |
| Colleges Net Expense | 1,090 | 1,289 | 1,185 | 1,331 | 1,453 |
| Transportation | 1,816 | 1,831 | 2,188 | 2,753 | 1,977 |
| Other Expense | |||||
| Capital Contingency Fund | – | – | – | – | 175 |
| Community Reinvestment Fund One-Time Transition Funding | – | 233 | – | – | – |
| Electricity Consumer Price Protection Fund | 253 | – | – | – | – |
| Interest on Debt | 9,604 | 9,368 | 9,019 | 8,841 | 9,123 |
| Move Ontario | – | – | 1,232 | 6 | – |
| One-Time and Extraordinary Assistance to Agricultural Sector | 64 | 601 | 282 | 278 | 20 * |
| Operating Contingency Fund | – | – | – | 40 | 580 |
| Pension and Other Employee Future Benefits | 309 | 458 | 729 | 567 | 533 |
| Power Purchases | 797 | 840 | 803 | 807 | 831 |
| Teachers’ Pension Plan | 235 | 240 | 295 | 345 | 349 |
| Year-End Savings | – | – | – | – | (900) |
| Total Expense | 73,883 | 79,396 | 83,927 | 88,833 | 91,153 |
| 1 Starting in 2005–06, the Province’s financial reporting has been expanded to include hospitals, school boards and colleges using one-line consolidation. Prior to 2005–06, historical figures reflect grants to these entities for comparison purposes. 2 The 2006–07 interim fiscal results reported in this Budget are based on the best information available as of early March 2007. 3 For 2005–06, 2006–07 and 2007–08, these ministry total expenses have been adjusted to reflect transfers to school boards, hospitals, and colleges, and are consolidated in these sector’s net expenses. Prior to 2005–06, ministry historical figures reflect the transfer of the grants to these entities for comparison purposes. 4 The 2003–04 expenses for Health and Long-Term Care and Hospitals include $824 million of SARS-related and major one-time health costs. The 2006–07 figures reflect a change in the presentation of expense in the Health Sector to be consistent with the 2005–06 Public Accounts. This change in presentation does not affect total expense. 5 Credit expense amounts relate to consolidation adjustments between the Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) and ministries to reflect net spending for the year. * 2007–08 Plan expenses of $20 million do not include potential provincial matching funds arising from the March 9, 2007 federal announcement. |
|||||
| Total Infrastructure Expenditures 2006–07 Interim |
2007–08 Plan | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investment in Capital Assets |
Transfers and Other Expenditures in Infrastructure 1 |
Total Infrastructure Expenditures |
||
| Transportation | ||||
| Transit | 1,691 | 598 | 394 | 992 |
| Highways | 1,442 | 1,549 | 154 | 1,703 |
| Other Transportation | 80 | 5 | 25 | 30 |
| Health | ||||
| Hospitals | 343 | 623 | 5 | 628 |
| Other Health | 189 | 50 | 176 | 226 |
| Education | ||||
| School Boards | 1,110 | – | 1,016 | 1,016 |
| Colleges | 68 | 184 | – | 184 |
| Universities | 52 | – | 71 | 71 |
| Water/Environment | 290 | 32 | 226 | 258 |
| Municipal and Local Infrastructure 2 | 556 | 2 | 249 | 251 |
| Justice | 111 | 89 | 42 | 131 |
| Other | 713 | 202 | 253 | 455 |
| Total 3 | 6,645 | 3,334 | 2,611 | 5,945 |
| 1 Mainly consists of transfers for capital purposes to municipalities and universities, expenditures for servicing capital-related debt of schools, and expenditures for the repair and rehabilitation of schools. These expenditures are included in the Province’s total expenses in Table 25. 2 Municipal and local water and wastewater infrastructure investments are included in the Water/Environment sector. 3 Total expenditures include $86 million in flow-throughs in Investment in Capital Assets (for provincial highways) and $160 million in flow-throughs in Transfers and Other Expenditures in Infrastructure ($28 million in Transportation, $45 million in Water/Environment, $87 million in Municipal and Local Infrastructure). |
||||
| 1998–99 | 1999–00 | 2000–01 | 2001–02 | 2002–03 1 | 2003–04 | 2004–05 | Actual 2 2005–06 | Interim 2006–07 | Plan 2007–08 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Transactions | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 56,050 | 65,042 | 66,294 | 66,534 | 68,891 | 68,400 | 77,841 | 84,225 | 89,143 | 91,503 |
| Expense | ||||||||||
| Programs | 49,036 | 53,347 | 53,519 | 55,822 | 59,080 | 64,279 | 70,028 | 74,908 | 79,992 | 82,030 |
| Interest on Debt | 9,016 | 11,027 | 10,873 | 10,337 | 9,694 | 9,604 | 9,368 | 9,019 | 8,841 | 9,123 |
| Total Expense | 58,052 | 64,374 | 64,392 | 66,159 | 68,774 | 73,883 | 79,396 | 83,927 | 88,833 | 91,153 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) Before Reserve | (2,002) | 668 | 1,902 | 375 | 117 | (5,483) | (1,555) | 298 | 310 | 350 |
| Reserve | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 750 |
| Surplus/(Deficit) | (2,002) | 668 | 1,902 | 375 | 117 | (5,483) | (1,555) | 298 | 310 | (400) |
| Net Debt 3, 4 | 114,737 | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 132,647 | 138,816 | 140,921 | 141,928 | 143,025 | 145,314 |
| Accumulated Deficit 3 | 114,737 | 134,398 | 132,496 | 132,121 | 118,705 | 124,188 | 125,743 | 109,155 | 108,845 | 109,245 |
| Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at Market Prices | 377,897 | 409,020 | 440,759 | 453,701 | 477,763 | 493,219 | 517,608 | 537,657 | 553,197 | 570,346 |
| Personal Income | 304,652 | 321,702 | 347,653 | 361,187 | 369,420 | 381,583 | 398,217 | 416,210 | 435,237 | 452,211 |
| Population — July (000s) | 11,367 | 11,506 | 11,685 | 11,898 | 12,102 | 12,263 | 12,417 | 12,559 | 12,687 | 12,848 |
| Net Debt per Capita (dollars) | 10,094 | 11,681 | 11,339 | 11,104 | 10,961 | 11,320 | 11,349 | 11,301 | 11,273 | 11,310 |
| Personal Income per Capita (dollars) | 26,801 | 27,959 | 29,752 | 30,357 | 30,526 | 31,117 | 32,070 | 33,140 | 34,306 | 35,197 |
| Total Expense as a per cent of GDP | 15.4 | 15.7 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 14.4 | 15.0 | 15.3 | 15.6 | 16.1 | 16.0 |
| Interest on Debt as a per cent of Revenue | 16.1 | 17.0 | 16.4 | 15.5 | 14.1 | 14.0 | 12.0 | 10.7 | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| Net Debt as a per cent of GDP | 30.4 | 32.9 | 30.1 | 29.1 | 27.8 | 28.1 | 27.2 | 26.4 | 25.9 | 25.5 |
| Accumulated Deficit as a per cent of GDP | 30.4 | 32.9 | 30.1 | 29.1 | 24.8 | 25.2 | 24.3 | 20.3 | 19.7 | 19.2 |
| 1 Starting in 2002–03, major tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries (land, buildings and transportation infrastructure) are accounted for on a full accrual accounting basis. Other tangible capital assets owned by Provincial ministries will continue to be accounted for as expense in the year of acquisition or construction. All capital assets owned by consolidated organizations are accounted for on a full accrual basis. 2 Starting in 2005–06, the Province’s financial reporting has been expanded to include hospitals, school boards and colleges using one-line consolidation. Prior to 2005–06, historical figures reflect grants to these entities for comparison purposes. 3 Net Debt is calculated as the difference between liabilities and financial assets. The annual change in Net Debt is equal to the Surplus/Deficit of the Province plus the change in tangible capital assets and the change in net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges. Accumulated Deficit is calculated as the difference between liabilities and total assets including tangible capital assets and net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges. The annual change in the Accumulated Deficit is equal to the Surplus/Deficit. For fiscal 2005–06, the change in the Accumulated Deficit includes the opening combined net assets of hospitals, school boards and colleges that were recognized upon consolidation of these BPS entities. 4 Net debt is restated in 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2005–06 to reflect the value of hydro corridor lands transferred to the Province from Hydro One Inc. Sources: Ontario Ministry of Finance and Statistics Canada. |
||||||||||



Provincial proceeds from gaming activities continue to support Provincial priorities, including the operation and support of hospitals, charities, amateur athletes, communities and the agricultural sector.
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Lotteries, Charity Casinos and Slot Machines at Racetracks Revenue | ||
| Operation of Hospitals | 1,512 | 1,481 |
| Ontario Trillium Foundation | 100 | 105 |
| Problem Gambling and Related Programs | 36 | 37 |
| Ontario Amateur Athletes | 10 | 10 |
| Commercial Casinos Revenue | ||
| General Government Priorities | 169 | 168 |
| Total | 1,827 | 1,801 |
| Sources: Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal and Ontario Ministry of Finance. | ||
The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation Act, 1999 requires that net Provincial revenue generated from lotteries, charity casinos and racetrack slot machines support services such as the operation of hospitals, funding for charitable organizations through the Ontario Trillium Foundation, and problem gambling and related programs.
In 2007–08, an estimated $1,481 million in net revenue from lotteries, charity casinos and slot machines at racetracks will be applied to support the operation of hospitals. While this level of support for hospitals from gaming revenue is down slightly from last year, hospitals’ net expense on a consolidated basis will increase by $834 million this year to $17.5 billion made up from other government revenues.
In 2007–08, the Ontario Trillium Foundation will be provided with $105 million to help build strong and healthy communities through contributions to charitable and not-for-profit organizations.
Two per cent of gross slot machine revenue, estimated at $37 million for 2007–08, is allocated for problem gambling prevention, treatment and research programs.
The Quest for Gold Lottery will provide an estimated $10 million for 2007–08 in direct financial support to Ontario high-performance amateur athletes. This funding will also support enhanced coaching and skills development.
In 2007–08, net Provincial revenue from commercial casinos, estimated at $168 million, will be used to support general government priorities, including health care, education and public infrastructure.
Commercial casino operations support approximately 12,000 direct jobs in Ontario. Along with local economic development, commercial casino operations and the additional tourists they attract contribute an estimated $2.4 billion annually to the Ontario economy.
| Interim 2006–07 |
Plan 2007–08 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural Sector | 317 | 329 |
| Municipalities | 75 | 78 |
| Total | 392 | 407 |
| 1 The agricultural sector’s share of racetrack slot-machine revenue and municipalities’ share of slot-machine revenue from charity casinos or racetrack slot facilities is received directly from the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation. Source: Ontario Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal. |
||
Twenty per cent of gross revenue from slot machines at racetracks is provided to promote the economic growth of the horse-racing industry. Since 1998, this initiative has provided over $2 billion to Ontario’s horse-racing industry, a key component of the Province’s agricultural sector. For 2007–08, additional support is estimated at $329 million.
A portion of gross slot-machine revenue, estimated at $78 million in 2007–08, will be provided to municipalities that host charity casinos and slot operations at racetracks. These revenues will help offset local infrastructure and service costs.
In addition to the key demand sensitivities and economic risks to the fiscal plan, there are additional risks stemming from the government’s contingent liabilities. Whether these contingencies will result in actual liabilities for the Province is beyond the direct control of the government. Losses could result from legal settlements, defaults on projects, and loan and funding guarantees. Provisions for losses that are likely to occur and can be reasonably estimated are expensed and reported as liabilities in the Province’s financial statements. Significant contingent liabilities are described as follows.
The Province has certain responsibilities with respect to nuclear used fuel waste management and nuclear station decommissioning. The Province, Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG), a wholly owned subsidiary, and certain subsidiaries of OPG are parties to the Ontario Nuclear Funds Agreement (ONFA), to establish, fund and manage segregated funds to ensure sufficient funds are available to pay the costs of nuclear station decommissioning and nuclear used fuel waste management. Under ONFA, the Province is liable to make payments should the cost estimate for nuclear used fuel waste management rise above specified thresholds for a fixed volume of used fuel. As well, under ONFA, the Province guarantees a return of 3.25 per cent over the Ontario consumer price index for the nuclear used fuel waste management fund. Ontario has also provided a direct Provincial guarantee to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission on behalf of OPG for up to $1.5 billion, which relates to the portion of the decommissioning and waste management obligations not funded by the segregated funds.
Ontario provides guarantees on loans on behalf of various parties. The authorized limit for loans guaranteed by the Province as at March 31, 2006, was $3.8 billion. The outstanding loans guaranteed and other contingencies amounted to $3.3 billion at March 31, 2006. A provision of $504 million based on an estimate of the likely loss arising from guarantees under the Student Support Programs has been reflected in the 2005–06 Consolidated Financial Statements of the Province.
The Province is liable to indemnify and reimburse the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation for any net costs, including any environmental liabilities incurred as a result of project defaults, for all non-profit housing projects in the Provincial portfolio. At March 5, 2007, there were $8.3 billion of mortgage loans outstanding.
There are claims outstanding against the Crown arising from legal action, either in progress or threatened, in respect of aboriginal land claims, breach of contract, damages to persons and property, and like items. At March 5, 2007, there were 100 claims outstanding against the Crown that were for amounts over $50 million.
The provincial and territorial governments of Canada have entered into a Canadian Blood Services Excess Insurance Captive Support Agreement (the “Captive Support Agreement”) with Canadian Blood Services (CBS) and Canadian Blood Services Captive Insurance Company Limited (CBSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of CBS established under the laws of British Columbia. Under the Captive Support Agreement, each government indemnifies CBSI for its pro rata share of any payments that CBSI becomes obliged to make under a comprehensive blood risks insurance policy it provides to CBS. The policy has an overall limit of $750 million, which may cover settlements, judgments and defence costs. The policy is in excess of, and secondary to, a $250 million comprehensive insurance policy underwritten by CBS Insurance Company Limited, a subsidiary of CBS domiciled in Bermuda. Given current populations, Ontario’s maximum potential liability under the Captive Support Agreement is approximately $376 million. The Province is not aware of any proceedings that could lead to a claim against it under the Captive Support Agreement.