Municipality of Temagami
|A 2013 Transition-Year Stable Funding Allocation (Line A1 x Line A2)||$1,087,900|
|1. 2013 OMPF Transition-Year Stable Funding Level (Line E)||99.4%|
|2. 2012 OMPF (Line C from 2012 Allocation Notice)||$1,094,400|
|B 2013 Combined Benefit of OMPF Transition-Year Stable Funding and Provincial Uploads (Line B1 + Line B2)||$1,878,300|
|1. OMPF Transition-Year Stable Funding (Equal to Line A)||$1,087,900|
|2. Provincial Uploads (Sum of Lines 2a through 2f)||$790,400|
|a. Ontario Drug Benefits (Uploaded in 2008)||$107,400|
|b. Ontario Disability Support Program - Administration Component (Uploaded in 2009)||$70,900|
|c. Ontario Disability Support Program - Benefits Component (Phased Upload Completed in 2011)||$474,800|
|d. Ontario Works - Benefits Component (Phased Upload Continues in 2013)||$51,900|
|e. Ontario Works - Administration Component (Additional Support Beginning in 2011)||$83,900|
|f. Court Security and Prisoner Transportation (Phased Upload Continues in 2013)||$1,500|
|C Other 2013 Ongoing Provincial Support / Uploads||$2,963,500|
|1. Public Health||$2,899,700|
|2. Land Ambulance||$63,800|
|D Key OMPF Data Inputs|
|1. Municipal Own-Source Revenue||$3,899,436|
|2. 2012 OMPF Compared to Municipal Own-Source Revenue (Line A2 / Line D1)||28.1%|
|3. Rural Designation Based on Rural and Small Community Measure||Rural|
|4. Northern and Rural Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index||7.8|
|E 2013 OMPF Transition-Year Stable Funding Level (Line E1 + Line E2)||99.4%|
|1. 2013 Minimum Funding Level||95.0%|
|2. Enhancement Based on Northern and Rural Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index||4.4%|
A – The 2013 Transition-Year Stable Funding Allocation ensures that in 2013 municipalities will receive a guaranteed level of support based on their 2012 OMPF allocation.
A1 – The 2013 Transition-Year Stable Funding Level applicable to the municipality. In 2013, municipalities in the north will receive at least 95 per cent of their 2012 OMPF allocation.
A2 – 2012 OMPF Allocation.
B1 – Equal to line A.
B2a to B2d – Estimated 2013 benefit of the Province's upload of social assistance benefit program costs. For further details see the 2013 Upload Benefit Report.
B2e – Reflects additional incremental funding provided to municipalities to support Ontario Works administration costs. Calculated as the difference between 2007 final Ontario Works administration cost and the estimated 2013 allocation. For further details see the 2013 Upload Benefit Report.
B2f – Estimated funding provided to the municipality by the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services with respect to the Province's phased upload of court security and prisoner transportation costs in 2013.
C1 – The estimated municipal benefit of the Province's 75 per cent share of public health funding relative to its 50 per cent share in 2004. Actual municipal savings may not correspond with the Allocation Notice due to budget approvals made by the local Boards of Health. Municipalities may provide additional funding beyond their obligated cost share. Any additional municipal funding is not included in the calculation of the public health figure.
C2 – The estimated municipal benefit of the Province's 50 per cent share of land ambulance funding is relative to its share in 2005. This incremental increase in land ambulance funding delivers on the Province's commitment to strengthen land ambulance services and maintain the 50:50 sharing of land ambulance costs.
D1 – Municipal Own-Source Revenue is composed of own-purpose taxation, payments in lieu of taxation, user fees and service charges, licenses, permits and rents, as reported by municipalities through the Financial Information Returns (FIRs).
D2 – Compares a municipality's 2012 OMPF allocation to its municipal own-source revenue.
D3 – For the 2013 transition year, a municipality with a Rural and Small Community Measure (RSCM) greater than 25 per cent will be considered a rural municipality.
D4 – The northern and rural Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index (MFCI) measures a municipality's fiscal circumstances relative to other municipalities in the province, and ranges from 0 to 10. A lower MFCI corresponds to relatively positive fiscal circumstances, whereas a higher MFCI corresponds to more challenging fiscal circumstances.
E1 – The 2013 minimum level of support. Municipalities in the north will receive at least 95 per cent of their 2012 OMPF allocation.
E2 – Enhancement based on the municipality's northern and rural Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index.
Note: Provincial funding and other ongoing provincial support initiatives rounded to multiples of $100.
Ontario Ministry of Finance
Provincial-Local Finance Division Issued: November 2012